Biphasic laboratory scale

The transfer hydrogenation methods described above are sufficient to carry out laboratory-scale studies, but it is unlikely that a direct scale-up of these processes would result in identical yields and selectivities. This is because the reaction mixtures are biphasic liquid, gas. The gas which is distilled off is acetone from the IPA system, and carbon dioxide from the TEAF system. The rate of gas disengagement is related to the superficial surface area. As the process is scaled-up, or the height of the liquid increases, the ratio of surface area to volume decreases. In order to improve de-gassing, parameters such as stirring rates, reactor design and temperature are important, and these will be discussed along with other factors found important in process scale-up. 

Laboratory-scale studies indicate that the aqueous biphasic process is well suited to the recovery of ultrafine, refractory material from soils containing significant amounts of sUt and clay. The main advantages of the aqueous biphasic system in treatment of uranium-contaminated soils are that the process achieves a high removal rate for the uranium contaminant and that such removal is highly selective. Laboratory studies indicate that approximately 99% of the soil is recovered in the clean fraction. 

Aqueous biphasic systems have been used commercially for protein separations, separation of metal ions, ultrafine particles, and organics. Application of the technology for soil decontamination has only been demonstrated in laboratory-scale studies. 

Preliminary estimates for full-scale treatment costs of uranium-contaminated soils were developed based on laboratory-scale studies. The process design uses polyethylene glycol (PEG) (15% solution) and sodium carbonate (10% salt solution) for the aqueous biphasic extractiou system. Uranium is recovered from the salt-rich phase by methanol precipitation. Methanol is then recovered by distillation. 

We developed at a laboratory scale a biphasic phos-genation process from L-Cysteine hydrochloride at controlled pH as depicted in scheme 222 (Ref. 275). 

Although still confined to laboratory scale, aqueous-biphase catalysis (cf. Section 3.1.1.1) and related variations such as supported liquid-phase catalysis (cf. Section 3.1.1.3.5) are emerging as viable techniques for the deep HDS of refined fuels [15]. 

The discussion in the previous sections has evidenced that the use of biphasic systems has solved, at least in various cases, the problem of homogeneous catalyst recovery and recycle, but there still exists the problem of the cost of recycle and especially of reaction rate per volume of reactor, which derives in large part from mass- and heat-transfer limitations, but also from the low amount of catalytic centers per volume of reactor necessary to avoid side reactions and maintain a high selectivity, and/or limit catalyst deactivation or loss. These aspects often emerge only during the scaling-up and industrialization of the reaction and this is one of the reasons why many interesting reactions at the laboratory scale fail in commercialization. 

From 1974 onwards the scope of different reactions using biphasic catalyst systems, preferably with precious metals, was tested in laboratory-scale experiments. Among these were butadiene hydrodimerization, hydrogenation of acrylonitrile or cyclohexene, hydroformylation of propene, and some other conversions to fine... 

The hydrogenation of the oleochemicals can proceed in the same apparatus in which the catalyst is formed. The fatty compound is added to the catalyst solution, thus yielding a biphasic system of two immiscible liquids. After the necessary quantity of hydrogen has been introduced, an intensive stirrer mixes the two liquid phases and the gas phase. On the laboratory scale, typical hydrogenations were carried out at room temperature and at ambient pressure allowing a reaction time of about 30 min. After the reaction the two phases are separated and the solvent/ water phase is recycled with the colloid catalyst to the reactor. 

Organic-Organic Biphasic Catalysis on a Laboratory Scale... 

Figure Laboratory-scale setup for catalysis in inverted scCOj/HjO biphasic systems.

Ionic liquids, fluorous biphasic systems, and supercritical fluids have all been studied as alternatives to conventional organic solvents. However, because of their nature, some of these novel systems require additional hardware for utilization. For example, some supphers have designed advanced mixing systems to enable polyphasic systems to be intimately mixed at the laboratory scale. There has also been considerable rethinking of the green credentials of some of these alternative solvents in recent years and many ionic liquids are no longer considered suitable because of their complex syntheses, toxicity, or other unacceptable properties, or difficulty in separation and puriflcation. Fluorous solvents (which are based on heavily fluorinated usually aliphatic compounds) are not considered to be environmentally compatible (as they persist in the environment). 

As far as industrial applications are concerned, the easy scale-up of two-phase catalysis can be illustrated by the first oxo aqeous biphasic commercial unit with an initial annual capacity of 100,000 tons extrapolated by a factor of 1 24,000 (batch-wise laboratory development production reactor) after a development period of 2 years [4]. 

Not surprisingly the ideal form of the process is aqueous biphase catalysis, in which the organometallic two-phase catalyst resides in a stationary aqueous solution in the reaction system. This is not only the most convenient arrangement on both the laboratory and industrial scale, but also the optimal modification wich respect to cost and environmental considerations. Use of water as the second phase has its limitations however, especially when the water solubility of the starting materials proves too low, preventing adequate transfer of organic substrate into the aqueous phase or at the phase boundary, and consequently reducing the reaction rate to such an extent that it becomes unacceptable. Cases... 

To be applied industrially, performance must be superior to that of the existing catalytic systems (activity, regioselectivity and recyclability). The use ofionic liquid biphasic technology for nickel-catalyzed olefin dimerization proved to be successful and this system has been developed and is now proposed for commercialization. However, much effort remains if the concept is to be extended to non-chloroaluminate ionic liquids. In particular, the true potential ofionic liquids (and mixtures containing ionic liquids) could be achievable if an even more substantial body of thermophysical and thermodynamic properties were amassed in order that the best medium for a given reaction could be chosen. As far as industrial applications are concerned, the easy scale-up of two-phase catalysis can be illustrated by the first 0X0 commercial unit with an initial capacity of 100 000 tons extrapolated by a factor of 1 24 000 (batch-wise laboratory development to production reactor) after a development period of 2 years [4]. 

Using the BASIL process (the acronym stands for Biphasic Add Scavenging utilizing Ionic Liquids), BASF was the first company to transfer ionic liquids from laboratory to commercial dimensions, and the BASIL process became the first large-scale industrial process worldwide that uses ionic hquids. 

---