Biopharmaceuticals activity

The three main sources of competitive advantage in the manufacture of high value protein products are first to market, high product quaUty, and low cost (3). The first company to market a new protein biopharmaceutical, and the first to gain patent protection, enjoys a substantial advantage. The second company to enter the market may find itself enjoying only one-tenth of the sales. In the absence of patent protection, product differentiation becomes very important. Differentiation reflects a product that is purer, more active, or has a greater lot-to-lot consistency. 

Human blood plasma contains over 700 different proteins (qv) (1). Some of these are used in the treatment of illness and injury and form a set of pharmaceutical products that have become essential to modem medicine (Table 1). Preparation of these products is commonly referred to as blood plasma fractionation, an activity often regarded as a branch of medical technology, but which is actually a process industry engaged in the manufacture of speciaUst biopharmaceutical products derived from a natural biological feedstock (see Pharmaceuticals). 

The advantages of such biotransformation processes are (1) the relatively high yields which can be achieved with specific enzymes, (2) the formation of chiral compounds suitable for biopharmaceuticals, and (3) the relatively mild reaction conditions. Key issues in industrial-scale process development are achieving high product concentrations, yields and productivities by maintaining enzyme activity and stability under reaction conditions while reducing enzyme production costs. 

I 6 H-bonding Parameterization in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships i Drug Design Tab. 6.5 Biopharmaceutics classification for 254 Drugs on the basis of HYBOT descriptors. 

Validation activity is the crucial end-stage in the process development of a biopharmaceutical chromatographic purification and one which young companies often underestimate. Regarding process validation, the FDA issued a guideline in 1986 which states ... 

The organization of PQRI is shown in Figure 5. A board of directors collects and allocates funds. A steering committee directs overall activities, and a series of technical committees work in five current priority areas drug substance, drug product, biopharmaceutics, science management, and novel... 

FDA Guidance for Industry Waiver of in vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Containing Certain Active Moieties/ Active Ingredients Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System, CDER-GUID 2062dft.wpd Draft, Jan. 1999. 

In this review, we focus on the use of plant tissue culture to produce foreign proteins that have direct commercial or medical applications. The development of large-scale plant tissue culture systems for the production of biopharmaceutical proteins requires efficient, high-level expression of stable, biologically active products. To minimize the cost of protein recovery and purification, it is preferable that the expression system releases the product in a form that can be harvested from the culture medium. In addition, the relevant bioprocessing issues associated with bioreactor culture of plant cells and tissues must be addressed. 

Several key issues have to be addressed in the downstream processing of biopharmaceuticals regardless of the expression system. The removal of host cell proteins and nucleic acids, as well as other product- or process-related or adventitious contaminants, is laid down in the regulations and will not differ between the individual expression hosts. The identity, activity and stability of the end product has to be demonstrated regardless of the production system. The need for pharmaceutical quality assurance, validation of processes, analytical methods and cleaning procedures are essentially the same. 

Many polypeptides undergo covalent modification after (or sometimes during) their ribosomal assembly. The most commonly observed such PTMs are listed in Table 2.7. Such modifications generally influence either the biological activity or the structural stability of the polypeptide. The majority of therapeutic proteins bear some form of PTM. Although glycosylation represents the most common such modification, additional PTMs important in a biopharmaceutical context include carboxylation, hydroxylation, sulfation and amidation these PTMs are now considered further. 

In other cases, the widespread application of a biopharmaceutical may be hindered by the occurrence of relatively toxic side effects (as is the case with tumour necrosis factor a (TNF-a, Chapter 9). Finally, some biomolecules have been discovered and purified because of a characteristic biological activity that, subsequently, was found not to be the molecule s primary biological activity. TNF-a again serves as an example. It was first noted because of its cytotoxic effects on some cancer cell types in vitro. Subsequently, trials assessing its therapeutic application in cancer proved disappointing due not only to its toxic side effects, but also to its moderate, at best, cytotoxic effect on many cancer cell types in vivo. TNF s major biological activity in vivo is now known to be as a regulator of the inflammatory response. 

The presence of serum-binding proteins. Some biopharmaceuticals (including insulin-like growth factor (IGF), GH and certain cytokines) are notable in that the blood contains proteins that specifically bind them. Such binding proteins can function naturally as transporters or activators, and binding can affect characteristics such as serum elimination rates. 

Many drugs, including many biopharmaceuticals, are administered to localized areas within the body by, for example, s.c. or i.m. injection. Local toxicity tests appraise whether there is any associated toxicity at/surrounding the site of injection. Predictably, these are generally carried out by s.c. or i.m. injection of product to test animals, followed by observation of the site of injection. The exact cause of any adverse response noted (i.e. active ingredient or excipient) is usually determined by their separate subsequent administration. 

A partial organizational structure of the FDA is presented in Figure 4.10. The core activities of biopharmaceutical drug approval/regulation is undertaken mainly by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the Center for Biologies Evaluation and Research (CBER). 

---