Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Base experimental protocol

In order to avoid a lack of consistent literature-based data, the Caco-2 permeability values of our selected compounds were transformed according to the following scheme the majority of compounds with Papp < 4 x 10 6 cm s 1 were classified as poorly absorbed and assigned a score of —1 compounds with Papp > 8 x 10 6 cm s 1 were classified as well-absorbed and assigned a score of +1. Different assumptions were made in special cases, when the experimental protocols were different or no internal standard compounds were used. [Pg.410]

Three different experimental protocols were used throughout the work. Two protocols were used to determine the activity size distribution, the first protocol, based on individual progeny, for the bulk of the measurement days (Jan 29 to Feb 6) and the second, based on Working Level, for the last two days (Feb 7 and 8). The third experimental protocol was used for general determination of Working Levels from Jan 29 to Feb 6. [Pg.225]

Pace, A. and Clennan, E.L. (2002). A new experimental protocol for intrazeolite photooxidations. The first product-based estimate of an upper limit for the intrazeolite singlet oxygen lifetime. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 11236-11237... [Pg.263]

FIGURE 15.3 Outline of experimental protocol used for ICAT differential protein expression profiling. Protein mixtures from two cell populations are labeled with light or heavy isotopic versions of a cleavable ICAT reagent. Labeled proteins are combined, subject to multidimensional separation by SCX, RP, and avidin affinity chromatography, then analyzed by tandem MS for peptide and protein identification. Based on the relative ratio of the two isotopically labeled peptides, a relative abundance of protein expression can be determined. [Pg.387]

Yang, J., Jamei, M., Yeo, K.R., Tucker, G. T. and Rostami-Hodjegan, A. (2005) Kinetic values for mechanism-based enzyme inhibition assessing the bias introduced by the conventional experimental protocol. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 26 (3-4), 334-340. [Pg.243]

The experimental protocol used to conduct measurements is based on the following principle a series of standard solutions is prepared by successive dilution of a stock solution and an excess but constant volume of buffer (ISAB or TISAB) is added at each step. Sample solutions are prepared in the same fashion. For each of the standards, the potential across the electrodes is measured and a semi-logarithmic calibration curve E — f(q) is obtained (Fig. 18.6). Using this curve and the potential difference obtained for each of the sample solutions, the concentration of species i can be obtained. [Pg.354]

Two important aspects of any experimentally based functional relationship are (1) its differential dz, i.e., the smallest sensible increment of change that can arise from corresponding differential changes (dxl9 dx2,..., dxn) in the independent variables and (2) its degrees of freedom n, i.e., the number of control variables needed to determine z uniquely. How small is the magnitude of dz (or any of the dxt) is related to specifics of the experimental protocol, particularly the inherent experimental uncertainty that accompanies each variable in question. [Pg.4]

The vast majority of studies assessing the quantity of extracellularly released organic compounds from primary producers have relied on different experimental protocols based on the 14C-tracer technique developed to measure photosynthesis in marine waters (Steeman-Nielsen, 1952). Using this technique, the extracellular DOM release by phytoplankton has been studied in both pure cultures and natural water samples. From pure culture... [Pg.7]

In [15] we highlight, based on concrete cases, the limitations of the other approaches such as the internet telescopes or Dshield. We discuss the aftermath of a very atypical worm, the Deloder one, as we see it from our honeypot point of view. We also describe an experimentation protocol, as well as its results, aiming at validating the assumption that several groups of attackers are exchanging information on the Internet in a non trivial way. [Pg.233]

In this experimental protocol, the results for the formation of tritiated phosphate inositol are as follows (based on percent of control) InP, 450 InP2, 360 InP3, 270. These results support the conclusion that PAF stimulates the breakdown of phosphoinositides via a phospholipase-C-mediated pathway. [Pg.99]

The planar chips used by the PatchXpress, QPatch, and Patchliner systems incorporate a glass-based substrate that permits the formation of GQ-level seal resistances between the cells and the plate. Consequently, the noise level on these systems tends to be low and they are thus capable of distinguishing small ionic currents (<100 pA) reliably. Their planar chips contain 8, 16, or 48 wells with a single aperture in the center bottom position of each well. These systems permit parallel recordings from several individual cells on the chip. However, due to variation in the performance of randomly selected cells, only a proportion are expected to complete any given experimental protocol and so the capacity to acquire pharmacology data may not match initial expectations (Xu et al. 2003). [Pg.72]

Experimental Biochemistry employs the use of potentially hazardous reagents. Strong acids, strong bases, volatile compounds, flammable compounds, mutagenic compounds, corrosive compounds, radioisotopes, electricity, and sharp objects are the tools of the biochemist. Like any other tool, these are hazardous only when handled improperly. At the beginning of each experimental protocol, we draw your attention to potential hazards that may be associated with a particular reagent you are about to use. [Pg.5]

U.S. EPA (1991) derived a cancer inhalation unit risk for sulfur mustard based on the results of inhalation animal studies conducted by McNamara et al. (1975, see Section 3.7.2) however, it was emphasized in the EPA report that the studies of McNamara et al. (1975) contained deficiencies which made a quantitative analysis difficult. Conducted in 1970, the studies do not conform to the modem norms of acceptable experimental protocol, and it is likely that there was bias in the assignment of the animals to the test categories (U.S. EPA, 1991). In addition, many of the exposures were very brief, included only a few animals, and many of the animals were sacrificed (and some were replaced) before their capacity to develop late-appearing tumors was fully developed (U.S. EPA, 1991). Despite these shortcomings, it was noted by EPA that the McNamara et al. data are the best available for estimating the carcinogenic potency of sulfur mustard. The authors of the EPA report analyzed two sets of McNamara s data one from a toxicity study and one from a carcinogenicity study (see Section 3.7.2). [Pg.278]

Based upon Eq. 4 a systematic study was performed with four polar permeants (urea, mannitol, sucrose, and raffinose) in an effort to characterize further the porous permeation pathway through HEM (Peck et al., 1994). Dual-labeled liquid scintillation counting and an experimental protocol that incorporated successive permeability experiments, as outlined in the previous sections, allowed the permeability coefficients for each permeant to be determined for each HEM sample studied. Again, Eq. 4 predicts that, for a porous membrane, the permeability coefficient ratio should be equal to the ratio of the diffusion coefficients for the solutes in the membrane. As a first approximation, if the relative radii of the solutes and the membrane pore radii Rp are such that hindrance considerations are negligible (Deen, 1987), then the ratio PJPy should approach the ratio of the free diffusion coefficients D of the solutes in bulk solution. [Pg.281]


See other pages where Base experimental protocol is mentioned: [Pg.45]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.804]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.791]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.446]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.307 ]




SEARCH



Experimental protocol

© 2024 chempedia.info