Baker Panel

Baker, J.A. et al., The Report of the BP U.S. Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel, January 2007, http //www.bp.com/liveassets/bp internet/globalbp/ globalbp uk english/SP/STAGING/local assets/assets/pdfs/Baker panel report.pdf... [Pg.42]

Interview, Isadore Irv Rosenthal, former board member of the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, member of the BP U.S. Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel (the Baker Panel), and Senior Research Fellow at the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, 2008... [Pg.154]

Baker Panel, A Case Study for Review of BP s Process Safety Management Systems, 2007. [Pg.112]

Since both structures have problems, what should a company do The Baker panel had a simple answer ... [Pg.125]

These mission statements and associated documents set the tone for the company. Even if these documents don t specifically mention process safety, these high-level managers should find a way to convey the importance of safety for the company. The first recommendation from the Baker Panel report on the BP U.S. Refineries highlighted this need ... [Pg.137]

The sheer volume of policy changes can also be a problem. Quoting from the Baker Panel report ... [Pg.141]

After a few months of investigation the CSB requested an independent review of BP America and its five refineries. A panel was funded by BP and established with an impressive array of talented individrrals at the helm. The Baker panel was charged to review serious concerns about ... [Pg.100]

A foreword on the findings published by the Baker Panel - broadens the impact... [Pg.110]

The Baker Panel had a broader focus than the BP investi tion by the CSB. It was charged with a review of all five BP US refineries. The panel was directed not to seek to affix blame or apportion responsibility for aity past event furthermore it shonld avoid duplicating the efforts of the CSB to determine the specific root canses of the accident at Texas City [17]. ... [Pg.110]

The Baker Panel reported their findings nnder three areas of emphasis The first focus area was Corporate Safety Culture. In the years since this Panel s report Safely Cnlture is being infused into maity organizations via the API RP 754 Process Safety Performance Indicators for Refining and Petrochemical Industries...and other w s. [Pg.110]

The Baker Panel s technical consultants performed PSM reviews employing a five to six person team at all five US BP refineries during the first half of 2006. During their 2 week site visits, they interviewed key personnel at all levels of those oiganizations. [Pg.111]

As I developed the fourth edition, I reahzed that over the years many of us, initially focused on the technical solutions to the various incidents that occurred, but maybe we should all be thinking more broadly on the Process Safety Culture as the BP Baker Panel did. The fourth edition has a chapter on Process Safety Culture. Finally the last chapter is completely revised and chock full of references and excellent somces of process safety related information. [Pg.489]

Baker III JA, Bowman FL, Erwin G, Gorton S, Hendershot D, Leveson N, Priest S, Rosenthal I, Tebo PV, Wiegmann DA, Wilson LD (2007) The report of the BP U.S, refineries independent safety review panel. The baker report http //www.bp.coin/liveassets/bp intemet/globalbp/ STAGING/global assets/downloads/Baker panel report.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2014 Baram M (2007) Liability and its influence on designing for product and process safety. Saf Sci 45 (1-2) 11-30... [Pg.181]

The leadership of senior managers, and the commitment of the chief executive, is vital to the development of a positive safety oulture. The Baker Panel Report has recently drawn specific attention to the importanoe of ... [Pg.143]

One of the recommendations of the Baker Panel Report following the Texas Qty Refinery explosion was that BP should establish and implement an integrated and comprehensive process safety management system that systematically and continuously identifies, reduces and manages process safety risks at its US refineries. The CSB Investigation Report made similar recommendations. These recommendations are equally applicable to sites with Buncefield-type potential. [Pg.145]

The presence of an effective personal safety management system does not ensure the presence of an effective process safety management system. The Report of the BP US Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel (the Baker Panel report ), following the Texas City refinery explosion in 2005, found that personal injury rates were not predictive of process safety performance at five US refineries. [Pg.176]

The Report of the BP U.S. Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel January 2007 (Fhe Baker Panel Report)... [Pg.196]

The CSB requested an independent panel investigate safety culture and management at BP North America. The Baker panel report found a lack of process safety management at company. BP CEO resigned in 2007. [Pg.117]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...