Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Attractive forces short range

In actuality, molecules in a gas interact via long-ranged attractions and short-range repulsive forces. An interaction potential energy function is used to describe these forces as a function of intermolecular distance and orientation. This section introduces two commonly used interaction potential energy functions. [Pg.492]

A much wider class, however, is presented by adsorbents where the adsorbed molecules interact directly with the inorganic mineral surface. In this case, a simple account of dispersion attraction and short-range atom-atom repulsion forces would not suffice, for polarization interaction is expected to play a major role. The corresponding approach employed will be demonstrated using the molecular-statistical interpretation of the expe-... [Pg.563]

We consider first the Maier-Saupe theory and its variants. In its original formulation, this theory assumed that orientational order in nematic liquid crystals arises from long-range dispersion forces that are weakly anisotropic. However, it has been pointed out that the form of the Maier-Saupe potential is equivalent to one in which there are both long-range attractive and short-range repulsive contributions to the intermolecular potential. The general form of this potential is... [Pg.249]

London dispersion or van der Waals forces Very weak Attractive Very short range (1/d )... [Pg.9]

Forces mediated by dissolved, nonadsorbing macromolecules need not be purely attractive. They are attractive at short ranges and at low volume fraction of the dissolved species. At distances larger than the size of the dissolved molecules and at high concentrations, it can be repulsive [1439, 1441. 1442). In general, depletion forces can be treated like solvation forces, and oscillatory behavior is predicted [1432, 1433] and observed [1443,1444]. The interface induces a layered structure of the dissolved molecules. Once two surfaces get dose to each other, this layered structure is disturbed. This results in a force. We call it structural force. [Pg.357]

Much of chemistry is concerned with the short-range wave-mechanical force responsible for the chemical bond. Our emphasis here is on the less chemically specific attractions, often called van der Waals forces, that cause condensation of a vapor to a liquid. An important component of such forces is the dispersion force, another wave-mechanical force acting between both polar and nonpolar materials. Recent developments in this area include the ability to measure... [Pg.225]

Such attractive forces are relatively weak in comparison to chemisorption energies, and it appears that in chemisorption, repulsion effects may be more important. These can be of two kinds. First, there may be a short-range repulsion affecting nearest-neighbor molecules only, as if the spacing between sites is uncomfortably small for the adsorbate species. A repulsion between the electron clouds of adjacent adsorbed molecules would then give rise to a short-range repulsion, usually represented by an exponential term of the type employed... [Pg.700]

The existence of intennolecular interactions is apparent from elementary experimental observations. There must be attractive forces because otherwise condensed phases would not fomi, gases would not liquefy, and liquids would not solidify. There must be short-range repulsive interactions because otherwise solids and liquids could be compressed to much smaller volumes with ease. The kernel of these notions was fomuilated in the late eighteenth century, and Clausius made a clear statement along the lines of this paragraph as early as 1857 [1]. [Pg.184]

The van der Waals attraction arises from tlie interaction between instantaneous charge fluctuations m the molecule and surface. The molecule interacts with the surface as a whole. In contrast the repulsive forces are more short-range, localized to just a few surface atoms. The repulsion is, therefore, not homogeneous but depends on the point of impact in the surface plane, that is, the surface is corrugated. [Pg.901]

The above potential is referred to as a Lennard-Jones or 6-12 potential and is summed over all nonbonded pairs of atoms ij. The first positive term is the short range repulsion and the second negative term is the long range attraction. The parameters of the interaction are Aj and B... The convenient analytical form of the 6-12 potential means that it is often used, although an exponential repulsion term is usually considered to be a more accurate representation of the repulsive forces (as used in MM-t). [Pg.176]

The forces which bring about adsorption always include dispersion forces, which are attractive, together with short-range repulsive forces. In addition, there will be electrostatic (coulombic) forces if either the solid or the gas is polar in nature. Dispersion forces derive their name from the close connection between their origin and the cause of optical dispersion. First... [Pg.4]

In the above analysis, Johnson et al. [6] assume that the interfacial forces act only when the surfaces are in contact, i.e. the attractive forces are considered to be of infinitesimally short range. This analysis ignores the forces acting just outside the edge of the contact circle. Because of this, the theory predicts an infinite tensile stress at the edge of the contact. If the attractive force between the surfaces is allowed to have a finite range, the infinity in the tensile stress disappears. The stress at the edge of the contact circle is still tensile, but it remains finite. [Pg.86]

Nevertheless, previous developments and some of our results prove that the structural properties of several systems with short-range repulsive forces are straightforwardly and sufficiently accurately given by ROZ integral equations. Thermodynamic properties are much more difficult to describe. Reliable tools exist to obtain thermodynamics at high temperatures or for states far from phase transitions. Of particular importance, and far from being solved, are the issues related to phase transitions in partly quenched systems, even for simple models with attractive interactions. It seems that the results obtained by Kierlik et al. [27], may serve as a helpful reference in this direction. [Pg.342]

The intermolecular forces operative in nonpolar compounds are also electrostatic-in nature. These weak van der Waals forces involve attraction between nonbonded atoms and are effective over short ranges only. [Pg.299]

We see that we can attach a definite physical meaning both to the existence of a neutral molecule in solution, and to the dissociation of this molecule into a pair of ions. Consider points near P and near Q in Fig. 27c. A point on the curve near P corresponds to the situation where the distance between the nuclei of the two ions has, say, the value OA, while a point on the curve near Q corresponds to the separation OB. If the separation of the nuclei is increased from OA to OB, a considerable amount of work is done against the short-range forces of attraction, in order to go from P to Q. But at Q the short-range forces are no longer operative and the neutral molecule has been dissociated into a pair of ions, between which there is the usual electrostatic attraction. [Pg.62]

Incomplete Dissociation into Free Ions. As is well known, there are many substances which behave as a strong electrolyte when dissolved in one solvent, but as a weak electrolyte when dissolved in another solvent. In any solvent the Debye-IIiickel-Onsager theory predicts how the ions of a solute should behave in an applied electric field, if the solute is completely dissociated into free ions. When we wish to survey the electrical conductivity of those solutes which (in certain solvents) behave as weak electrolytes, we have to ask, in each case, the question posed in Sec. 20 in this solution is it true that, at any moment, every ion responds to the applied electric field in the way predicted by the Debye-Hiickel theory, or does a certain fraction of the solute fail to respond to the field in this way In cases where it is true that, at any moment, a certain fraction of the solute fails to contribute to the conductivity, we have to ask the further question is this failure due to the presence of short-range forces of attraction, or can it be due merely to the presence of strong electrostatic forces ... [Pg.63]


See other pages where Attractive forces short range is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.861]    [Pg.1740]    [Pg.2766]    [Pg.2766]    [Pg.3007]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.823]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.62]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.40 ]




SEARCH



Attractive force long/short range

Attractive forces

Attractive range

Short-range

Short-range forces

© 2024 chempedia.info