London dispersion

Assuming London-dispersion and electrostatic interactions to be dominant in arene - arene interactions (see Section 3.2.7), the solvent effect on the enantioselectivify is anticipated to be influenced by the polarisability and polarity of the solvent. The arene -arene interaction is inferred to... 

In summary, there are indications that neither hydrophobic interactions, nor donor- acceptor interactions are predominantly driving the arene - arene interaction. Osnsequently, we contend that these interactions are mainly governed by London - dispersion and electrostatic forces. 

Attractive and Repulsive Forces. The force that causes small particles to stick together after colliding is van der Waals attraction. There are three van der Waals forces (/) Keesom-van der Waals, due to dipole—dipole interactions that have higher probabiUty of attractive orientations than nonattractive (2) Debye-van der Waals, due to dipole-induced dipole interactions (ie, uneven charge distribution is induced in a nonpolar material) and (J) London dispersion forces, which occur between two nonpolar substances. 

There are probably several factors which contribute to determining the endo exo ratio in any specific case. These include steric effects, dipole-dipole interactions, and London dispersion forces. MO interpretations emphasize secondary orbital interactions between the It orbitals on the dienophile substituent(s) and the developing 7t bond between C-2 and C-3 of the diene. There are quite a few exceptions to the Alder rule, and in most cases the preference for the endo isomer is relatively modest. For example, whereas cyclopentadiene reacts with methyl acrylate in decalin solution to give mainly the endo adduct (75%), the ratio is solvent-sensitive and ranges up to 90% endo in methanol. When a methyl substituent is added to the dienophile (methyl methacrylate), the exo product predominates. ... 

There are three types of interactions that contribute to van der Waals forces. These are interactions between freely rotating permanent dipoles (Keesom interactions), dipole-induced dipole interaction (Debye interactions), and instantaneous dip le-induced dipole (London dispersion interactions), with the total van der Waals force arising from the sum. The total van der Waals interaction between materials arise from the sum of all three of these contributions. 

PDMS based siloxane polymers wet and spread easily on most surfaces as their surface tensions are less than the critical surface tensions of most substrates. This thermodynamically driven property ensures that surface irregularities and pores are filled with adhesive, giving an interfacial phase that is continuous and without voids. The gas permeability of the silicone will allow any gases trapped at the interface to be displaced. Thus, maximum van der Waals and London dispersion intermolecular interactions are obtained at the silicone-substrate interface. It must be noted that suitable liquids reaching the adhesive-substrate interface would immediately interfere with these intermolecular interactions and displace the adhesive from the surface. For example, a study that involved curing a one-part alkoxy terminated silicone adhesive against a wafer of alumina, has shown that water will theoretically displace the cured silicone from the surface of the wafer if physisorption was the sole interaction between the surfaces [38]. Moreover, all these low energy bonds would be thermally sensitive and reversible. 

Among all the low energy interactions, London dispersion forces are considered as the main contributors to the physical adsorption mechanism. They are ubiquitous and their range of interaction is in the order 2 molecular diameters. For this reason, this mechanism is always operative and effective only in the topmost surface layers of a material. It is this low level of adhesion energy combined with the viscoelastic properties of the silicone matrix that has been exploited in silicone release coatings and in silicone molds used to release 3-dimensional objects. However, most adhesive applications require much higher energies of adhesion and other mechanisms need to be involved. 

In this equation, AG°CS is taken to be negligible for p- and y-cyclodextrin systems and to be constant, if there is any, for the a-cyclodextrin system. The AG W term is virtually independent of the kind of guest molecules, though it is dependent on the size of the cyclodextrin cavity. The AG dw term is divided into two terms, AG°,ec and AGs°ter, which correspond to polar (dipole-dipole or dipole-induced dipole) interactions and London dispersion forces, respectively. The former is mainly governed by the electronic factor, the latter by the steric factor, of a guest molecule. Thus, Eq. 2 is converted to Eq. 3 for the complexation of a particular cyclodextrin with a homogeneous series of guest molecules ... 

Matsui75) has computed energies (Emin) which correspond to the minimal values of Evdw in Eq. 1 for cyclodextrin-alcohol systems (Table 2). Besides normal and branched alkanols, some diols, cellosolves, and haloalkanols were involved in the calculations. The Emi values obtained were adopted as a parameter representing the London dispersion force in place of Es. Regression analysis gave Eqs. 9 and 10 for a- and P-cyclodextrin systems respectively. 

With this basis, one gets for the constant in the London dispersion energy formula E = — j... 

Kristyan, S., Pulay, P., 1994, Can (Semi)Local Density Functional Theory Account for the London Dispersion Forces , Chem. Phys. Lett., 229, 175. 

The physical forces involved in the hydrogen bond must include electrostatic and inductive forces in addition to London dispersion forces... 

Although the fact that the cycloamyloses include a variety of substrates is now universally accepted, the definition of the binding forces remains controversial. Van der Waals-London dispersion forces, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic interactions have been frequently proposed to explain the inclusion phenomenon. Although no definitive criteria exist to distinguish among these forces, several qualitative observations can be made. 

When the hydrophobic effect brings atoms very close together, van der Waals interactions and London dispersion forces, which work only over very short distances, come into play. This brings things even closer together and squeezes out the holes. The bottom line is a very compact, hydrophobic core in a protein with few holes. 

---