Atomic surface pore dimension

Atomic force microscopy is finding more use in examination of membranes, but artifacts must be addressed, as was done by Bowen and Doneva [197], who noted changes in pore size and structure and used Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) filtering to show the true pore shape. Samples for AFM were prepared by attaching them to steel disks with double sided tape. These same authors used AFM to characterize ultrafiltration membranes [198, 199] and characterized the pore dimensions and quantified the interaction or adhesion of cellulose with two polymeric UF membranes. Atomic force microscopy was also used to characterize molecularly imprinted composite polyethersulfone membranes for quantification of the pore size and surface roughness [200]. 

One must distinguish between macroscopic and microscopic imperfections existing on a real surface. Macroscopic imperfections are perturbations of the periodic structure covering a region of dimensions considerably greater than the lattice constant. They include cracks on the surface of the crystal, pores, and various macroscopic inclusions. We shall not deal with such imperfections here. Microscopic imperfections are perturbations of dimensions of the order of a crystallc raphic cell. Microscopic imperfections include vacancies in the surface layer of the crystal, foreign atoms or lattice atoms on the surface, different groups of such atoms (ensembles), etc. We shall limit ourselves to a consideration of this kind of imperfection. 

Examination of powdered materials with an electron microscope can generally disclose the presence of surface imperfections and pores. However, those imperfections or irregularities smaller than the microscope s resolving power will remain hidden. Also hidden is the internal structure of the pores, their inner shape and dimensions, their volume and volume distribution as well as their contribution to the surface area. However, by enveloping each particle of a powder sample in an adsorbed film, the method of gas adsorption can probe the surface irregularities and pore interiors even at the atomic level. In this manner a very powerful method is available which can generate detailed information about the morphology of surfaces. 

Figure 8 Configurations of Ar atoms adsorbed at 77 K in a hexagonal pore having a largest dimension of 10 nm at (a) P = 0.1 Po, (b) P = P = 0.22 Po, (c) P = 0.44 Po. Black spheres correspond to the hydrogen atoms which delimitate the pore surface, the white spheres are argon atoms.

Simulations of self-diffusion have been reviewed recently [60]. In addition to molecular motion on flat surfaces (including those with atomic roughness), selfdiffusion constants have been evaluated for atoms adsorbed on surfaces with comers (as in pores with rectangular cross sections or on grooved surfaces) and with steps. In these systems, a deep nearly one-dimensional potential well occurs in the model gas-surface energy at the comers. Atoms adsorbed in this well are essentially localized in one-dimension, which means that self-diffusion hardly occurs in the directions perpendicular to the comer. 

Zeolite Catalysts. - Crystalline silica-aluminates or zeolitic supports differ in three important respects from the alumina and silica supports discussed above. First, they are very strong cation exchangers and tend to stabilize low valent cations, making them more difficult to reduce completely. Secondly, they in general have a pore structure commensurate with atomic dimensions. This microporous structure is such as to restrict the adsorption or exclude altogether the more bulky ions. Together with the highly polar surface this small pore size also makes them very difficult to dehydrate at low temperatures. Finally, the catalyst structure itself tends to be thermally and hydrolytically unstable, particularly at a low pH. 

In Eqn (7.2), s j is the distance from the adsorbed molecule to the solid atom j having energy parameter Sj. It is readily seen from Fig. 7.1 that over 90% of the value of 17 is provided by the surface atoms within 3-4 molecular diameters of the adsorbed molecule. It is clear that any irregularity in the local chemical composition, density, or geometry of the surface will cause a variation in the adsorptive potential at that point. If the surface topography is locally re-entrant, so as to constitute a fine pore of molecular dimensions, then the... 

Usually, the stress intensities associated with the pores themselves are insufficient to cause failure, and as such the role of pores is indirect. Fracture from pores is typically dictated by the presence of other defects in their immediate vicinity. If the pore is much larger than the surrounding grains, atomically sharp cusps around the surface of the former can result. The critical flaw thus becomes comparable to the dimension of the pores. If the... 

The adsorption of Sn " atoms on zeolite and silica-gel surfaces has been studied [122]. The bonding appears to become stronger as the pore size of the material decreases towards molecular dimensions. The asymmetry of the tin(II) quadrupole splitting was held to indicate a Karyagin effect because of the anisotropy of surface atoms. 

Bifunctional Catalysts. One reason invoked (there are others) for why metal particles with high dispersion are desirable for catalysis is that the ratio of surface metal atoms to total number of atoms is quite high. Consider the potential cluster size for two zeolites faujasite and ZSM-12. Faujasite has supercages, which for the purposes of this question can be described as spherical with a diameter of 12 A, and ZSM-12 has a one-dimensional elliptical pore structure of dimensions 5.6 x 6.0 A. Assuming the metal atoms of inteiest have a diameter of 1.0 A and the cluster has a packing fraction corresponding to an FCC structure (0.74), estimate the number of atoms in a metal cluster in each of the two zeolites mentioned above. 

In conclusion, it should be pointed out that none of the physicochemical techniques discussed above permits the direct measurement of the elements of the polymeric materials porous structure we measure the properties of the systems where the polymers interact with certain test substances (nitrogen, mercury, water, polystyrene standards, ions, etc.), and not the dimensions of the pores or other supramolecular elements of the material. Therefore, the evaluation of the surface area and diameters of pores available to the molecules of these substances must be considered as indirect methods of examining the porous structure. Because of this, all calculations are based on assuming certain models of the structure of the material and accepting certain assumptions as to the mechanism of interaction between the material and test molecules. Only transmittance, scanning, and, in particular, atomic force microscopy can be considered as direct methods of measuring dimensions and distances. However, up to now the last technique has not been appHed to microporous hypercrosslinked polymers. 

---