Aquifer boundary

Certain factors must, however, be considered in choosing the appropriate analytical solution unconsolidated vs. consolidated conditions, fully vs. partially penetrating wells, variable discharge rules, delayed yield, and aquifer boundaries. Most methods are best suited for unconsolidated aquifers with well-defined overlying and underlying boundaries, whereas with consolidated aquifers, the effective aquifer thickness is uncertain. A pumping well that fully penetrates a confined aquifer (i.e.,... 

Figure 9.1. Simulated contours of present-day hydraulic heads (in feet) generated from the calibrated two-dimensional finite difference flow model developed by GeoTrans (1987b). Arrows indicate the directions of groundwater flow. Also shown are the finite difference model and the confined/unconfined aquifer boundaries. Star symbols indicate the two water samples used in inverse modeling.

Stage 2 (Collect Existing System Information). This includes information on habitat, geology, soil maps, topography, river system, etc. Here it may also be relevant to have model predictions of future development for aquifer boundaries and habitat changes. 

In this section, we discuss numerical solutions to Laplace s equation for the pressure P(x,y), with and without wells and fractures, using both aquifer boundary conditions specifying pressure, and solid wall conditions assuming zero normal flow. We consider, for purposes of exposition, the Cartesian form... 

The term aquifer is used to denote an extensive region of saturated material. There are many types of aquifers. The primary distinction between types involves the boundaries that define the aquifer. An unconfined aquifer, also known as a phraetic or water table aquifer, is assumed to have an upper boundary of saturated soil at a pressure of zero gauge, or atmospheric pressure. A confined aquifer has a low permeabiUty upper boundary that maintains the interstitial water within the aquifer at pressures greater than atmospheric. For both types of aquifers, the lower boundary is frequendy a low permeabihty soil or rock formation. Further distinctions exist. An artesian aquifer is a confined aquifer for which the interstitial water pressure is sufficient to allow the aquifer water entering the monitoring well to rise above the local ground surface. Figure 1 identifies the primary types of aquifers. 

Nested wells can also be used to analyze multilayer aquifer flow. There are many situations involving interaquifer transport owing to leaky boundaries between the aquifers. The primary case of interest involves the vertical transport of fluid across a horizontal semipermeable boundary between two or more aquifers. Figure 4 sets out the details of this type of problem. Unit 1 is a phraetic aquifer, bound from below by two confined aquifers, having semipermeable formations at each interface. 

Modeling of the transport of the long-lived nuclides, especially U, require knowledge of the input at the water table as a boundary condition for aquifer profiles. There are few studies of the characteristics of radionuclides in vadose zone waters or at the water table. Significant inputs are likely to occur to the aquifer due to elevated rates of weathering in soils, and this is likely to be dependent upon climatic parameters and has varied with time. Soils may also be a source of colloids and so provide an important control on colloidal transport near recharge regions. 

Figure 2 was constructed by contouring of values calculated from the flow net of figure 1. Much more complex diagrams are possible provided sufficient information concerning the aquifer and fluid-flow conditions can be obtained. For simple boundary conditions and homogeneous aquifers, a direct analytical solution for isochronal surfaces is available [2]. 

Fig. 20.3. Transport model of the migration of a chemical species through an aquifer, calculated for two Peclet numbers, Pe. Species is not present initially, but from t = 0 to t = 2 years recharge at the left boundary contains the species at concentration C0. After this interval, concentration in recharge returns to zero. Fine line shows result for dispersivity aL of 0.03 m, corresponding to a P6clet number on the scale of the aquifer (1000 m) of 33 000 bold line shows results for oil = 3 m, or Pe = 330.

The value of S0 decreases with increasing elevation. Zao, the interface between air and the LNAPL phase, may or may not coincide with Zu, the upper boundary of the aquifer. Typically, the saturation of the LNAPL phase extends over two distinct regions (see Figure 5.10). These are (1) water and LNAPL phase zone, and (2) water, LNAPL phase, and air zone. When a single homogeneous stratum is considered, O can be assumed constant. In a stratified medium, however, saturation discontinuities generally exist due to the variation in soil characteristics, and the determination of LNAPL volume based on Equation 6.22 may become much more involved. 

Maintenance of current commercial status quo. At a few locations, the decision has been made to continue operation of the facility without disruption, so long as NAPL product and dissolved chemicals do not exit the boundary of the facility or provide a risk to workers or the environment at the site. Hydraulic containment of the aquifer is the procedure that is usually selected for these sites. A system including recovery wells and injection wells can often be operated to balance the subsurface flux so that product loss equals product recovery at a minimal cost. 

The unsaturated zone can be modeled as a bottleneck boundary of thickness 8 = 4 m. The TCE concentration at the lower end of the boundary layer is given by the equilibrium with the aquifer and at the upper end by the atmospheric concentration of TCE, which is approximately zero. Thus, you need to calculate the nondimensional Henry coefficient of TCE at 10°C, KTCB a/w(10°C). 

During many decades a factory has spilled polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into a small creek which leads to a small lake. Meanwhile the pollution has stopped, yet the local authorities are afraid that PCB concentrations in the outlet of the lake may still be dangerous for the drinking-water supply operating on the aquifer further downstream. You are asked to make a first guess whether this fear may be substantiated. You decide to use a simple box model. Where would you draw the boundaries of the model and which subcompartments (if any) would you choose ... 

Aquifers may be classified as unconfined or confined. Although unconfined aquifers usually have sediments or soils between them and the surface, the geologic materials are sufficiently permeable so that unconfined aquifers are rapidly influenced by atmospheric conditions, including pressure and precipitation events (Figure 3.5). The upper boundary of an unconfined aquifer is the water table. A confined aquifer is located between two aquitards ((Freeze and Cherry, 1979), 48). At least one aquitard occurs between a confined aquifer and the surface. That is, a confined aquifer is substantially insulated from conditions on the Earth s surface. 

The results are compared with solutions determined using fixed-length management periods. The hypothetical homogeneous, isotropic, confined aquifer is comprised of 60 finite elements and 77 nodes, with dimensions 1500 m by 900 m (Culver and Shenk, 1998). The initial contaminant plume, which has a maximum toluene concentration of 40 mg/L, is shown in Figure 1. An easterly steady flow was maintained with a constant hydraulic head of 12.0 m and contaminant concentration of 0.0 mg/L on the left side, a constant hydraulic head of 0.0 m and contaminant concentration of 0.0 mg/L on the right side, and no flow at the top and bottom boundaries. In this example, the sorbed phase is assumed to remain in equilibrium with the... 

A two-dimensional example problem is also developed to demonstrate the advective control model. The example problem is solved for both confined and unconfined conditions and the solutions are compared. In this example problem, the aquifer is homogeneous and isotropic, with no flow conditions imposed at the top and bottom boundaries and constant head conditions along the left and right boundaries. The head on the constant head boundaries slopes downward toward the bottom of the domain. The domain is 3100 m by 3100 m and is discretized into 49 rows and 58 columns. A river runs through the domain as shown in Figure 6. 

In extrapolating laboratory results to installed slurry wall of thickness L, the commonly applied idealized BCs may not provide an accurate representation of the transitions between an engineered barrier and native aquifer material in the field. To provide conservative predictions for design, Rabideau and Khandelwal (1998b) recommend the combination of a constant concentration entrance (x = 0) BC with a zero-concentration exit (x = L) BC. In particular, several commonly used BCs should be avoided because they distort the nature of the diffusive flux at the boundaries (e.g., the Danckwerts constant-flux entrance BC and the zero-gradient exit BC). These issues are discussed in greater detail by Rabideau and Khandelwal (1998b). 

Wilson and Liu showed that both location and travel time probabilities can be calculated directly, using a backward-in-time version of traditional continuum advection-dispersion modeling. In addition, they claimed that by choosing the boundary conditions properly, the method can be readily generalized to include linear adsorption with kinetic effects and 1st order decay. An extension of their study for a 2D heterogeneous aquifer was reported in Liu and Wilson [39]. The results for travel time probability are in very close agreement with the simulation results from traditional forward-in-time methods. 

As a NAPL pool dissolves into the interstitial fluid of a water saturated porous formation, a concentration boundary layer is assumed to be developed above the NAPL-water interface. Assuming that the thickness of the pool is insignificant relative to the thickness of the aquifer, the mass transfer from the NAPL-water interface into the aqueous interstitial fluid within a three-dimensional, saturated porous formation is described by the following relationship [40] ... 

The fourth difficulty—one often encountered—is that a health outcome routinely measured by political boundaries (cancer mortality, for instance) has to be reshaped to environmental boundaries, such as those imposed by an aquifer or wind pattern, to include the population under study. Unless the exposure or outcome borders are defined by properly extrapolating or interpolating them to coincide geographically, any cause-and-effeet relationship is useless. 

---