Distinction between type A and

In the theory on uncertainty, a distinction between type A and B uncertainties is made. Type A uncertainties are frequency-based estimates of standard deviations (e.g, an SD of the imprecision). Type B uncertainties are uncertainty components for which frequency-based SDs are not available. Instead, the uncertainty is estimated by other approaches or by the opinion of experts. Finally the total uncertainty is derived from a combination of all sources of uncertainty. In this context, it is practical to operate with standard uncertainties (w t), which are equivalent to standard deviations. By multiplication of a standard uncertainty with a coverage factor (k), the uncertainty corresponding to a specified probability level is derived. For example, multiplication with a coverage factor of two yields a probability level of 95% given a normal distribution. When considering the total uncertainty of an analytical result obtained by a routine method, the preanalytical variation, method imprecision, random matrix-related interferences, and uncertainty related to calibration and bias corrections (traceability) should be taken into account. Expressing the uncertainty components as standard uncertainties, we have the general relation ... 

For sensors, final control elements, and non-PE logic solvers, the minimum fault tolerance Is determined based only upon the SIL of the SIF. Table 6 was developed based on IEC 61508-2 fault tolerance criteria for PE devices and assumes a SFF between 60% and 90% for any device specified. This assumption simplified the fault tolerance requirements of IEC 61508-2, allowing the elimination of the distinction between Type A and Type B devices. This resulted in the fault tolerance tables in ANSI/ISA-84.00.01-2004-1, Clause 11.4, being more conservative than those in IEC 61508 for some Type A devices. As a... 

The distinction between the two categories of uncertainties (types A and B) is based on the method of their evaluation. Those of type A, but not those of type B, can be evaluated by statistical methods [6], These categories do not correspond exactly to the former grouping of uncertainties into random and systematic. No distinction is made between types A and B for the combination of uncertainties... 

Although the above distinction between type I and type II diamonds is useful, there exists type lib diamonds containing both boron and a small nitrogen content. 

There is not always a clear distinction between Type I and Type II systems. Section II of this volume addresses several works with gels. In some cases the nonlinearities of the gel also play a role. The extreme case is the system developed by Siegel. He and his colleagues utilized the hysteresis in a hydrogel s permeability to create autonomous chemomechanical oscillations in a hydrogel/enzyme system driven by glucose 49,50), This is also addressed in chapter 4. 

The standard creates a distinction between design verification and design validation. There are two types of verification those verification activities performed during design and on the component parts to verify conformance to specification and those verification activities performed on the completed design to verify performance but more on this later. 

The distinction between coordination polymerization and ionic polymerization is not sharp. Let us consider for example a C—X bond, X being a halogen or a metal. Winstein54 and Evans14 have demonstrated that in a compound containing this type of bond an equilibrium may be established in a suitable solvent between... 

Despite their simplified structures, most of the tripodal based chelators exhibit iron binding with pronounced affinity, facilitate synthesis and allow fast screening of a variety of related structures with a number of bacterial types in a relatively short time. There is, however, a clear distinction between the flexible and the rigid templates. While the former generally exhibit broad spectrum microbial activity, the latter are generally less active and frequently show no biological activity at all. 

In this case, the reduced form of the catalyst builds up with the substrate a relatively unstable adduct AQ, which then decomposes, eventually after further reduction at the electrode surface or in solution. Finally, either the oxidized form P of the catalyst or its reduced form Q is regenerated. As regards the substrate, its reduction follows the aforementioned E.C. (Electrochemical Chemical) mechanism. This type of catalysis is termed chemical catalysis. Finally, it must be pointed out that the clear-cut distinction between redox catalysis and chemical catalysis might be difficult, but amounts ultimately to a detailed study of the nature of the redox reaction. 

CPSC, FTC, DOT and many others. Most of us are so well acquainted with these types of regulations that they have become a day-to-day part of our activities. Because they are so familiar to us, we may miss the very significant distinction in this classification, the distinction between standards regulations and pre-market registration. 

The number and exact composition of the sheets is used to classify the phyllosilicates. The most important classification for our purposes is the distinction between 1 1 and 2 1-type minerals (Figure 2.1). In 1 1 minerals such as kaolinite, the basal oxygens of the tetrahedral sheet are free to interact with octahedral OH groups forming hydrogen bonds. In contrast, 2 1 minerals such as pyrophyllite or talc contain two tetrahedral sheets sandwiched around an octahedral sheet. These minerals have only basal oxygens exposed on the faces of the tetrahedral sheets and are linked by weak van der Waals forces. The weaker interaction of one 2 1 layer with a second 2 1 layer results in interlayer spaces which, depending on the particular mineral, may be available for contaminant intercalation. 

The Mesopotamian materials, despite their extreme variety of types and time periods, showed a remarkably consistent pattern. Distinctions between the upper and lower Tigris materials do not seem possible, given the elements obtained in the analysis. The ceramics from the one Euphrates site, Babylon, also fit the Tigris pattern. Materials from sites higher along the Euphrates are needed to complete the profile of Mesopotamia. 

Naturally, the fixed composition phase transformations treated in this section can be accompanied by local fluctuations in the composition field. Because of the similarity of Fig. 17.3 to a binary eutectic phase diagram, it is apparent that composition plays a similar role to other order parameters, such as molar volume. Before treating the composition order parameter explicitly for a binary alloy, a preliminary distinction between types of order parameters can be obtained. Order parameters such as composition and molar volume are derived from extensive variables any kinetic equations that apply for them must account for any conservation principles that apply to the extensive variable. Order parameters such as the atomic displacement 77 in a piezoelectric transition, or spin in a magnetic transition, are not subject to any conservation principles. Fundamental differences between conserved and nonconserved order parameters are treated in Sections 17.2 and 18.3. 

---