Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Alternate Concentration Limits

Groundwater Protection Standards (40 CFR 264.94) Alternate Concentration Limits (ACLs)... [Pg.273]

Stabilizing the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere therefore implies that net emissions ultimately fall to zero from present levels, which are in excess of 6 petagrams of carbon per year (PgC/yr). ft is cumulative emissions that matter. Therefore, the particular time path of emissions will depend on the concentration to which atmospheric CO2 is limited, ft also means that to satisfy the cost-effectiveness objective of the FCCC, emissions may rise before finally declining. Emissions trajectories consistent with five alternative concentration limits are shown in Figure 1.1. Key characteristics associated with emissions paths consistent with CO2 concentrations limits are shown in Table 1.1. [Pg.21]

To each ml of the antibody solution, add 6 mg of 2-mercaptoethylamine hydrochloride (final concentration is 50mM). Mix to dissolve. Alternatively, to limit the degree of disulfide reduction, add a 500-fold molar excess of 2-mercaptoethylamine over the concentration of antibody present. [Pg.95]

Establishing an acceptable risk or dose. There also are a number of precedents for establishing an acceptable (barely tolerable) risk or dose of substances that cause stochastic responses for the purpose of classifying waste as low-hazard or high-hazard. For radionuclides, the annual dose limit for the public of 1 mSv currently recommended by ICRP (1991) and NCRP (1993a) and contained in current radiation protection standards (DOE, 1990 NRC, 1991) could be applied to hypothetical inadvertent intruders at licensed near-surface disposal facilities for low-hazard waste. This dose corresponds to an estimated lifetime fatal cancer risk of about 4 X 10 3. Alternatively, the limits on concentrations of radionuclides in radioactive waste that is generally acceptable for near-surface disposal,... [Pg.279]

For IC5o determinations, the substrate concentration should be close to the Am for the marker reaction. As discussed previously, this choice of substrate concentration allows an estimate of the A) value because IC50 = 2A) for competitive inhibition and IC50 = A, for noncompetitive inhibition. For A) determinations, a common substrate concentration scheme is Am/3, Am, 3Am, 6Am, and 10Am. Assuming that the Km for the reaction has been accurately determined, this range of substrate concentrations will provide an adequate spread of data on an Eadie-Hofstee plot to readily observe the mechanism of direct inhibition. For some substrates, solubility can become limiting at concentrations >2Am. In such cases, it becomes necessary to choose alternate concentrations so that no fewer than five concentrations are used in a A, determination. The choice of substrate... [Pg.271]

For work on a 1 -mole scale one would thus have to use a 1.000-liter flask to activate and then lactonize the entire ft)-hydroxycarboxylic acid. Of course, it is much more practical to work in a smaller reaction vessel. However, one must also not exceed the mentioned concentration limit of < 1 pmol/L. Therefore, one can introduce only as much of the carboxylic acid in this smaller reaction vessel at a time so that its concentration does not exceed 1 pmoEL. Subsequently, one would have to activate this amount of acid and would then have to wait until it is lactonized. After that additional acid would have to be added and then activated, and so on. A more practical alternative is shown in Side Note 6.3. [Pg.295]

Whenever a measured value exceeds a certain threshold (an internally defined limit or a legal restriction criterion) then a confirmation procedure is recommended or even necessary. The purpose of confirmation analysis is to prove or disapprove the measurement result obtained by the usual analytical method. Generally, the difference from the confirmation procedure compared to the usual test method should be due to only either the use of a completely different separation column (with completely different retention behaviour) in the same detection system or the use of an alternative detection method with sufficient sensivity. For the latter case and especially for GC methods, the prefered procedure should be to apply analyte selective mass spectroscopy (MS) detection. In some cases, derivatisation of the analyte followed by MS detection can also be the method of choice. In the case of HPLC methods, different polarity of another column in connection with full exploitation of modern UV diode array detection systems may be useful to selectively allow confirmation of the analyte. It is extremely important to make sure that the confirmation procedure works at the restriction criterion level or other self-defined concentration limit ... [Pg.310]

Place a few milligrams of the test sample (or, alternatively, use the residue obtained by evaporating 2 drops of the test solution to dryness) in a micro test-tube, add a little pure diphenylamine and melt over a free flame. When cold, take up the melt in a drop or two of alcohol when the latter will be coloured blue. Sensitivity 5 pg (COOH)2. Concentration limit 1 in 10,000. [Pg.371]

Solid scintillators such as anthracene have been tested as alternatives for continuous measurements (ICRU 1972). The scintillation material and the radionuclide collector are combined, as discussed above for scintillation beads (Winn 1993). The operating characteristics of these devices, such as the sample volume, count accumulation period, energy resolution, detection efficiency, and background must be arranged to satisfy radionuclide concentration limit specifications. [Pg.130]

The German Degussa process, - operated during the Second World War, was essentially of this type, but Degussa tended to operate their cells simply with a sodium chloride-beryllium chloride melt. This necessitates a higher temperature and vapour losses, or alternatively working between two high beryllium chloride concentration limits, so that even at the end of electrolysis about 30 per cent of beryllium chloride is still present in the melt. [Pg.281]

Emission standards for SO2 vary widely, but a conunon concentration limit is 1.25 g of SO2 per Nm, which has to be met by sulfuric plant emissions. On this basis, sulfur emissions from the blast furnace commonly exceed normal standards by a substantial margin. This has indeed resulted in the closure of some European lead blast furnaces or the conversion to alternative technologies. The alternative is to scrub the gas after fume collection with a Ume slurry, which is capable of reducing the SO2 concentration to 0.01 per cent by volume or 0.3 g per Nm. Otherwise a combination of total plant ventilation gases from sinter plant and refining operations with blast furnaces gases may be able to meet overall emission concentration limits for sulfur, but at the expense of large gas volume movements per tonne of lead produced (at around 12 000 Nm /tonne of lead). [Pg.86]

In the theories for dilute solutions of flexible molecules based on the bead-spring model, the contribution of the solute to the storage shear modulus, loss modulus, or relaxation modulus is given by a series of terms the magnitude of each of which is proportional to nkT, i.e., to cRTjM, as in equation 18 of Chapter 9 alternatively, the definition of [C ]y as the zero-concentration limit of G M/cRT (equations 1 and 6 of Chapter 9) implies that all contributions are proportional to nkT. Each contribution is associated with a relaxation time which is proportional to [ri Ti)sM/RT-, the proportionality constant (= for r i) depends on which theory applies (Rouse, Zimm, etc.) but is independent of temperature, as is evident, for example, in equation 27 of Chapter 9. Thus the temperature dependence of viscoelastic properties enters in four variables [r ], t/j, T explicitly, and c (which decreases slightly with increasing temperature because of thermal expansion). [Pg.266]

FIGURE 1.1 Net annual anthropogenic carbon emissions paths consistent with alternative CO2 concentration limits and the assumed population growth from the IS92a scenario of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The curve marked IS92a assumes no CO2 concentration limit. The specified limit occurs in the year 2150. [Pg.22]

To begin to explore the role of technology in filling the gap, we first construct a reference energy system and compare its evolution to an alternative path with a CO2 concentration limit. We have... [Pg.26]


See other pages where Alternate Concentration Limits is mentioned: [Pg.149]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.751]    [Pg.727]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.1625]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.43]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.149 ]




SEARCH



Limiting concentration

© 2024 chempedia.info