Energy reference

The predictions of relative stability obtained by the various approaches diverge more widely when nonbenzenoid systems are considered. The simple Hiickel method using total n delocalization energies relative to an isolated double-bond reference energy (a + fi) fails. This approach predicts stabilization of the same order of magnitude for such unstable systems as pentalene and fulvalene as it does for much more stable aromatics. The HMO, RE, and SCF-MO methods, which use polyene reference energies, do much better. All show drastically reduced stabilization for such systems and, in fact, indicate destabilization of systems such as butalene and pentalene (Scheme 9.2). 

Recall the splitting of the d orbitals in octahedral environments. The energies of the t2g and g subsets are shown in Fig. 8-4 with respect to their mean energy. We have used the conventional barycentre formalism. In effect, we express the energy of an electron in the t2g or orbitals with respect to the total energy possessed by a set of five electrons equally distributed amongst the five d functions. Alternatively, we say that our reference energy is that of 2l d electron within the equivalent spherical mean field. 

Equations 9.3a and 9.3b give the energy of the upper and lower part of the cone (f/ and f/fi). In Eqs 9.3a and 9.3b, the first term represents Q in Eq. 9.2, while the expression under the square root sign corresponds to Tin Eq. 9.2. is the reference energy at the apex of the cone. The remaining qnantities in these two equations are energy derivatives. The quantity in Eq. 9.3g is the gradient difference vector, while the qnantity in Eq. 9.3h... 

Baerends, E. J., Branchadell, V., Sodupe, M., 1997, Atomic Reference Energies for Density Functional Calculations , Chem. Phys. Lett., 265, 481. 

Let us choose, as an arbitrary reference level, the energy of an electron at rest in vacuum, e ) (cf. Section 3.1.2). This reference energy is obvious in studies of the solid phase, but for the liquid phase, the Trasatti s conception of absolute electrode potentials (Section 3.1.5) has to be adopted. The formal energy levels of the electrolyte redox systems, REDox, referred to o, are given by the relationship ... 

On the other hand, if the measurement situation is such that the reference energy is small and cannot be increased (e.g. outdoor open-air monitoring, or insufficient time available for coaddition of data), so that the noise level is an appreciable fraction of the reference signal, then this phenomenon can become important. 

Now in fact, all this is also in accord with reality an attempt to use data in which the reference energy becomes so small that the noise brings even a single reading down to zero will cause the computed value corresponding to that reading to become infinite then, averaging that with any finite number of other finite values will still result in an... 

Note that equation 44-71 can be reduced to equation 41-19 [2], which is appropriate when the signal-to-noise ratio is high and may be considered constant. Under these conditions Ex is large and the second term under the radical is small and the first term under the radical, which is independent of Es, dominates then the noise of the transmittance increases with T as Vl + T2 and inversely with the reference energy. 

To summarize the effects at low signal-to-noise to compare with the high signal-to-noise case summarized above, here the noise of the transmittance increases directly with T and still inversely with the reference energy. 

The conclusion from all this is that the variance and therefore the standard deviation attains infinite values when the reference energy is so low that it includes the value zero. However, in a probabilistic way it is still possible to perform computations in this regime and obtain at least some rough idea of how the various quantities involved will change as the reference energy approaches zero after all, real data is obtained with a finite number of readings, each of which is finite, and will give some finite answer what we can do for the rest of this current analysis is perform empirical computations to find out what the expectation for that behavior is we will do that in the next chapter. 

Figure 44-10a Transmittance noise as a function of transmittance, for different values of reference energy S/N ratio (recall that, since the standard deviation of the noise equal unity, the set value of the reference energy equals the S/N ratio), (see Color Plate 11)...

The results are shown in Figure 45-11. It is obvious that for values of Ex greater than five (standard deviations of the noise), the optimum transmittance remains at the level we noted previously, 33 %T. When the reference energy level falls below five standard deviations, however, the optimum transmittance starts to decrease. The erratic nature of the variance at these low values of Ex, however, makes it difficult to ascertain the exact amount of falloff with any degree of precision nevertheless it is clear that as much as we can talk about an optimum transmittance level under these conditions, where variance can become infinite and the actual transmittance value itself is affected, it decreases at such low values of Ex. Nevertheless, a close look reveals that when... 

AEr occurs in the denominator AEr always summed together with Er. Together with point 2, this means that the denominator is never zero as long as the reference energy Et is non-zero. Therefore all terms to be included in the computation are finite. Again we repeat our reminder that the results of these computations are mathematical expectations, in a real measurement situation denominators of zero can be expected to occur when Er is less than approximately five. 

Equation (5.30) holds for the simple case of a phase with the formula A, B)i(C, D)i. But for more complex phases the function for the Gibbs reference energy surface may be generalised by arranging the site fractions in a (f + c) matrix if there are I sublattices and c components. 

---