Air resource management

Watson, J. G. (ed.), "Receptor Models in Air Resources Management." APCA Transaction Series, No. 14. Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, 1989. 

Air resource management The enforcement of set standards to reduce contamination supported by control regulations, planning, and quality testing facilities. 

Henry, R. C., and Kim, B. M. (1989) A factor analysis receptor model with explicit physical constraints, in Receptor Models in Air Resources Management, J. G. Watson, ed., APCA Transactions 14, Air Pollution Control Association, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 214-225. 

Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., and Mathai, C. V. (1989) Receptor models in air resources management A summary of the APCA international specialty conference, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 39, 419-426. 

Air pollution and environmental officers, environmental protection associates, environmental quality managers and environmentalists, and specialists (air pollution, air pollution control, air quality, air quality control, air resource, envaronmental control, environmental health, environmental management, environmental quality, highway transportation, monitoring, pollution control, program, public participation, quality assurance, and unspecified). 

Provides scientific and technical support for the Federal Environment Ministry, especially with the preparation of legal and administrative regulations in the fields of air quality control, noise abatement, waste management, water resources management, soil conservation, environmental chemicals, and health-related environmental issues. 

RI Div Air Resources. 1998. State of Rhode Island, Department of Environmental Management, Division of Air Resources. 5 R.I. Code R. 12-031-002. 

The California Air Resources Board has prepared risk assessments for a number of toxic airborne compounds and mixtures, designated as toxic air contaminants, TACs (Table 16.15). For example, risk assessments for individual compounds such as benzene, benzo[a]pyrene (see Chapter 10), formaldehyde, and vinyl chloride have been carried out, in addition to complex mixtures such as diesel exhaust (California Air Resources Board, 1997a) and environmental tobacco smoke (California Environmental Protection Agency, 1997). These risk assessment documents form the basis for controls imposed as part of the risk management process (e.g., see Seiber, 1996). 

RAND would like to thank the following organizations for their generous support of the forum and of this document Toyota South Coast Air Quality Management District California Air Resources Board Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Bechtel Chevron Corp. Parsons Corporation Ballard Power Systems, Inc. Gas Technology Institute Stuart Energy Arizona Public Service Applied Research and Engineering Services IF, LLC and Nuvera Fuel Cells. 

The members include companies and organizations from around the world DaimlerChrysler, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota, and Volkswagen Ballard Power Systems, UTC Fuel Cells BP, ExxonMobil, Shell Hydrogen, and ChevronTexaco and the California Air Resources Board, the California Energy Commission, the United States Department of Energy, the United States Department of Transportation and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. 

Burtraw, Dallas. (1999). Trading emissions to clean the air Exchanges few but savings many. In The RFF Reader in Environmental and Resource Management, Oates, Wallace E. (Ed.), Resources for the Future Washington, DC. 

Naugle DF, Pierson TK (1991) A framework for risk characterization of environmental pollutants. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 41(10) 1298-1307 NEPC (2003) Technical paper on monitoring for particles as PM2.5. National Environment Protection (Ambient Air Quality) Measure. National Environment Protection Council NZMOE (2004) Resource Management Regulations SR 2004/309. New Zealand Ministiy of Environment... 

Software System Safety Handbook, 2010. Joint Services Computer Resources Management Group U.S. Navy, U.S. Army, and the U.S. Air Force, Joint Services Software Safety Committee, Joint Services System Safety Panel. Electronic Industries Association, G-48 Committee. https //acc.dau.miPCommunityBrowser.aspx id=683698. 

Input mechanisms refer to the beginning of the chain—selection. Pilots or air traffic controllers enter a process of learning and training, assessment and evaluation. Learning processes feed into selection and crew performance, and, as it has been researched in crew resource management, eventually become part of individual performance, so that input mechanisms ideally integrate the results from an entire chain. 

Because so much of aviation is controlled by people, human factor analysis tools are at the heart of the aviation industry. Different types of human factors analyses are used in air navigation, such as air traffic control, crew resource management in the cockpit, and even appropriate design and maintenance of aircraft systems. Fault tree analysis, fault hazard analysis, FMEA, and different probabilistic risk tools are also used in the detailed design of safety critical subsystems. 

Lauber, J.K. (1984). Resource management in the cockpit. Air Line Pilot, 53, 20-23. McIntyre, R.M. and Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance emerging principles from complex environments. In R. Guzzo and E. Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 9-45). San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass. 

---