Adsorption interfacial tensions

A zero or near-zero contact angle is necessary otherwise results will be low. This was found to be the case with surfactant solutions where adsorption on the ring changed its wetting characteristics, and where liquid-liquid interfacial tensions were measured. In such cases a Teflon or polyethylene ring may be used [47]. When used to study monolayers, it may be necessary to know the increase in area at detachment, and some calculations of this are available [48]. Finally, an alternative method obtains y from the slope of the plot of W versus z, the elevation of the ring above the liquid surface [49]. 

The extensive use of the Young equation (Eq. X-18) reflects its general acceptance. Curiously, however, the equation has never been verified experimentally since surface tensions of solids are rather difficult to measure. While Fowkes and Sawyer [140] claimed verification for liquids on a fluorocarbon polymer, it is not clear that their assumptions are valid. Nucleation studies indicate that the interfacial tension between a solid and its liquid is appreciable (see Section K-3) and may not be ignored. Indirect experimental tests involve comparing the variation of the contact angle with solute concentration with separate adsorption studies [173]. 

Thus, adding surfactants to minimize the oil-water and solid-water interfacial tensions causes removal to become spontaneous. On the other hand, a mere decrease in the surface tension of the water-air interface, as evidenced, say, by foam formation, is not a direct indication that the surfactant will function well as a detergent. The decrease in yow or ysw implies, through the Gibb s equation (see Section III-5) adsorption of detergent. 

If an ionic surfactant is present, the potentials should vary as shown in Fig. XIV-5c, or similarly to the case with nonsurfactant electrolytes. In addition, however, surfactant adsorption decreases the interfacial tension and thus contributes to the stability of the emulsion. As discussed in connection with charged monolayers (see Section XV-6), the mutual repulsion of the charged polar groups tends to make such films expanded and hence of relatively low rr value. Added electrolyte reduces such repulsion by increasing the counterion concentration the film becomes more condensed and its film pressure increases. It thus is possible to explain qualitatively the role of added electrolyte in reducing the interfacial tension and thereby stabilizing emulsions. 

In the 1990s, the thmst of surfactant flooding work has been to develop surfactants which provide low interfacial tensions in saline media, particularly seawater require less cosurfactant are effective at low concentrations and exhibit lower adsorption on rock. Nonionic surfactants such as alcohol ethoxylates, alkylphenol ethoxylates (215) and propoxylates (216), and alcohol propoxylates (216) have been evaluated for this appHcation. More recently, anionic surfactants have been used (216—230). 

Adsorption onto Particles. The Gibbs Adsorption Law relates how adsorption (qv) onto surfaces affects interfacial tension,... 

If adsorption occurs (T > 0), then increasing the concentration of dispersant in the bulk water reduces interfacial tension (5). 

In the absence of specific interactions of the receptor - ligand type the change in the Helmholtz free energy (AFadj due to the process of adsorption is AFads = yps - ypi - Ysi, where Yps, YPi and ys, are the protein-solid, protein-liquid and solid-liquid interfacial tensions, respectively [5], It is apparent from this equation that the free energy of adsorption of a protein onto a surface should depend not only of the surface tension of the adhering protein molecules and the substrate material but also on the surface tension of the suspending liquid. Two different situations are possible. 

In the above we have assumed that no other forces than the electrical are acting at the surface of separation. In general, there will be the capillary forces as well, and we have to take account of the influence of the electrical double layer in considering the adsorption of an electrolyte. If w is the area of the surface, o the interfacial tension, e the charge per unit area, and E the difference of potential, we shall have ... 

Studies on mechanisms are described by Balzer [192]. In the case of anionics the residual oil in the injection zone is removed via displacement into the adjacent reservoirs ether carboxylates show their good adaptation to differences in temperature and salinity. Further it was found from interfacial tension measurements, adsorption and retention studies, and flooding tests that use of surfactant blends based on ether carboxylates and alkylbenzensulfonates resulted... 

The presence of calcium and magnesium ions increases the adsorption of the surfactants at the water-air interface and leads to a corresponding lowering of the surface tension at the CMC as shown by the data in Table 4. A C16 branched AOS gives a lower surface tension than a linear C16 AOS this too is in agreement with other model studies and theoretical predictions [42, and Sec. 2 on interfacial tension). 

Anodically polished and then cathodically reduced Cd + Pb alloys have been studied by impedance in aqueous electrolyte solutions (NaF, KF, NaC104, NaN02, NaN03).827 For an alloy with 2% Pb at cNap 0.03 M, Emfo = -0.88 V (SCE) and depends on cNaF, which has been explained by weak specific adsorption of F" anions. Surface activity increases in the sequence F" < CIO4 < N02. The Parsons-Zobel plot at E is linear, with /pz = 1.33 and CT° = 0.31 F m"2. Since the electrical double-layer parameters are closer to those for pc-Pb than for pc-Cd, it has been concluded that Pb is the surface-active component in Cd + Pb alloys827 (Pb has a lower interfacial tension in the liquid state). 

This potential depends on the interfacial tension am of a passivated metal/electrolyte interface shifting to the lower potential side with decreasing am. The lowest film breakdown potential AEj depends on the surface tension of the breakdown site at which the film-free metal surface comes into contact with the electrolyte. A decrease in the surface tension from am = 0.41 J m"2 to nonmetallic inclusions on the metal surface, will cause a shift of the lowest breakdown potential by about 0.3 V in the less noble direction. 

The appreciation of the importance of adsorption phenomena at liquid interfaces is probably as old as human history, since it is easily recognized in many facets of everyday life. It is not surprising that liquid interfaces have been a favorite subject of scientific interest since as early as the eighteenth century [3,4], From an experimental point of view, one obvious virtue of the liquid interfaces for studying adsorption phenomena is that we can use surface tension or interfacial tension for thermodynamic analysis of the surface properties. The interfacial tension is related to the adsorbed amount of surface active substances through the Gibbs adsorption equation. 

The second terms on the right-hand side of Eqs. (4)-(6), however, are not always negligible. The negative adsorption, i.e., the depletion, of nonsurface active ions is associated with the contribution of the second term, making the value on the left-hand side negative [31]. In this case, the interfacial tension at the potential of zero charge, pzc. 

The interaction between the adsorbed molecules and a chemical species present in the opposite side of the interface is clearly seen in the effect of the counterion species on the HTMA adsorption. Electrocapillary curves in Fig. 6 show that the interfacial tension at a given potential in the presence of the HTMA ion adsorption depends on the anionic species in the aqueous side of the interface and decreases in the order, F, CP, and Br [40]. By changing the counterions from F to CP or Br, the adsorption free energy of HTMA increase by 1.2 or 4.6 kJmoP. This greater effect of Br ions is in harmony with the results obtained at the air-water interface [43]. We note that this effect of the counterion species from the opposite side of the interface does not necessarily mean the interfacial ion-pair formation, which seems to suppose the presence of salt formation at the boundary layer [44-46]. A thermodynamic criterion of the interfacial ion-pair formation has been discussed in detail [40]. 

It follows from the above that the mechanism for electrical potential oscillation across the octanol membrane in the presence of SDS would most likely be as follows dodecyl sulfate ions diffuse into the octanol phase (State I). Ethanol in phase w2 must be available for the transfer energy of DS ions from phase w2 to phase o to decrease and thus, facilitates the transfer of DS ions across this interface. DS ions reach interface o/wl (State II) and are adsorbed on it. When surfactant concentration at the interface reaches a critical value, a surfactant layer is formed at the interface (State III), whereupon, potential at interface o/wl suddenly shifts to more negative values, corresponding to the lower potential of oscillation. With change in interfacial tension of the interface, the transfer and adsorption of surfactant ions is facilitated, with consequent fluctuation in interface o/ wl and convection of phases o and wl (State IV). Surfactant concentration at this interface consequently decreased. Potential at interface o/wl thus takes on more positive values, corresponding to the upper potential of oscillation. Potential oscillation is induced by the repetitive formation and destruction of the DS ion layer adsorbed on interface o/wl (States III and IV). This mechanism should also be applicable to oscillation with CTAB. Potential oscillation across the octanol membrane with CTAB is induced by the repetitive formation and destruction of the cetyltrimethylammonium ion layer adsorbed on interface o/wl. Potential oscillation is induced at interface o/wl and thus drugs were previously added to phase wl so as to cause changes in oscillation mode in the present study. 

Double integration with respect to EA yields the surface excess rB+ however, the calculation requires that the value of this excess be known, along with the value of the first differential 3TB+/3EA for a definite potential. This value can be found, for example, by measuring the interfacial tension, especially at the potential of the electrocapillary maximum. The surface excess is often found for solutions of the alkali metals on the basis of the assumption that, at potentials sufficiently more negative than the zero-charge potential, the electrode double layer has a diffuse character without specific adsorption of any component of the electrolyte. The theory of diffuse electrical double layer is then used to determine TB+ and dTB+/3EA (see Section 4.3.1). 

Opinions differ on the nature of the metal-adsorbed anion bond for specific adsorption. In all probability, a covalent bond similar to that formed in salts of the given ion with the cation of the electrode metal is not formed. The behaviour of sulphide ions on an ideal polarized mercury electrode provides evidence for this conclusion. Sulphide ions are adsorbed far more strongly than halide ions. The electrocapillary quantities (interfacial tension, differential capacity) change discontinuously at the potential at which HgS is formed. Thus, the bond of specifically adsorbed sulphide to mercury is different in nature from that in the HgS salt. Some authors have suggested that specific adsorption is a result of partial charge transfer between the adsorbed ions and the electrode. 

Electroneutral substances that are less polar than the solvent and also those that exhibit a tendency to interact chemically with the electrode surface, e.g. substances containing sulphur (thiourea, etc.), are adsorbed on the electrode. During adsorption, solvent molecules in the compact layer are replaced by molecules of the adsorbed substance, called surface-active substance (surfactant).t The effect of adsorption on the individual electrocapillary terms can best be expressed in terms of the difference of these quantities for the original (base) electrolyte and for the same electrolyte in the presence of surfactants. Figure 4.7 schematically depicts this dependence for the interfacial tension, surface electrode charge and differential capacity and also the dependence of the surface excess on the potential. It can be seen that, at sufficiently positive or negative potentials, the surfactant is completely desorbed from the electrode. The strong electric field leads to replacement of the less polar particles of the surface-active substance by polar solvent molecules. The desorption potentials are characterized by sharp peaks on the differential capacity curves. 

---