Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Water interfacial tension

The effectiveness of heterogeneous defoaming is determined mainly by two factors the antifoam solubility and its ability to prevent adsorption of the surfactant at the aqueous film/antifoam interface, thus, destabilising the asymmetric aqueous films. The solubility of saturated alcohols in water and in aqueous surfactant solutions decreases with the increase in the molecular mass within the homologous series. The ability of alcohols to prevent adsorption change in the same direction. The difference between the interfacial tensions water/alcohol and aqueous surfactant solution/alcohol can serve as a quantitative measure for the change in the surfactant adsorption at the aqueous solution/alcohol interface... [Pg.650]

Diffusivity or viscosity Solid-liquid interfacial tension Water/solvent activity Boiling/melting point Solute activity (concentration)... [Pg.835]

FIGURE 10.30 Profiles of interfacial tensions (water/microemulsion and oil/microemulsion) at 0.9 PV injection. [Pg.454]

The importance of the hydrophobicity of the protein in determining the surface activity was demonstrated clearly by Kato and Nakai [2], As shown in Fig. la, the emulsifying activity index increases with the increase in the hydrophobicity index of various proteins. In a similar way, the increase in hydrophobicity index leads to a decrease in the interfacial tension (water-corn oil) (Fig. lb). Although these... [Pg.39]

Figure 4 Effect of chain length of modified proteins on interfacial tension (water-tetradecan). at low and high degrees of modifications. The degree of modification of each protein is indicated. (From Ref. 70. Reprinted by permission.)... Figure 4 Effect of chain length of modified proteins on interfacial tension (water-tetradecan). at low and high degrees of modifications. The degree of modification of each protein is indicated. (From Ref. 70. Reprinted by permission.)...
As mentioned previously, at the Y-shaped junction droplet formation takes place in a one-step mechanism that is determined by the viscous shear force and the interfacial tension force [11]. Because of this special feature, it was possible to directly measure the effect of interfacial tension on the droplet size using various systems with different static interfacial tensions. Water/ ethanol mixtures were used as continuous phase, and hexadecane and silicon oils as to-be-dispersed phase. The size of the droplets was recorded and a calibration curve constructed, and based on that curve, the dynamic interfacial tension could be estimated in systems that contain surfactants. [Pg.1000]

Molten naphthalene at its melting point of 82°C has the same density as does water at this temperature. Suggest two methods that might be used to determine the naphthalene-water interfacial tension. Discuss your suggestions sufficiently to show that the methods will be reasonably easy to cany out and should give results good to 1% or better. [Pg.41]

Fig. III-9. Representative plots of surface tension versus composition, (a) Isooctane-n-dodecane at 30°C 1 linear, 2 ideal, with a = 48.6. Isooctane-benzene at 30°C 3 ideal, with a = 35.4, 4 ideal-like with empirical a of 112, 5 unsymmetrical, with ai = 136 and U2 = 45. Isooctane- Fig. III-9. Representative plots of surface tension versus composition, (a) Isooctane-n-dodecane at 30°C 1 linear, 2 ideal, with a = 48.6. Isooctane-benzene at 30°C 3 ideal, with a = 35.4, 4 ideal-like with empirical a of 112, 5 unsymmetrical, with ai = 136 and U2 = 45. Isooctane-<yclohexane at 30°C 6 ideal, with a = 38.4, 7 ideallike with empirical a of 109.3, (a values in A /molecule) (from Ref. 93). (b) Surface tension isotherms at 350°C for the systems (Na-Rb) NO3 and (Na-Cs) NO3. Dotted lines show the fit to Eq. ni-55 (from Ref. 83). (c) Water-ethanol at 25°C. (d) Aqueous sodium chloride at 20°C. (e) Interfacial tensions between oil and water in the presence of sodium dodecylchloride (SDS) in the presence of hexanol and 0.20 M sodium chloride. Increasing both the surfactant and the alcohol concentration decreases the interfacial tension (from Ref. 92).
Application of 150 MPa pressure increases the interfacial tension for w-hex-ane-water from 50.5 to 53.0 mN/m at 25°C. Calculate AV. What is AV for that area corresponding to a molecular size (take a representative molecular area to be 20 A ) Convert this to cm /cm mol. [Pg.92]

The equilibrium shape of a liquid lens floating on a liquid surface was considered by Langmuir [59], Miller [60], and Donahue and Bartell [61]. More general cases were treated by Princen and Mason [62] and the thermodynamics of a liquid lens has been treated by Rowlinson [63]. The profile of an oil lens floating on water is shown in Fig. IV-4. The three interfacial tensions may be represented by arrows forming a Newman triangle ... [Pg.112]

Referring to Fig. IV-4, the angles a and /3 for a lens of isobutyl alcohol on water are 42.5° and 3°, respectively. The surface tension of water saturated with the alcohol is 24.5 dyn/cm the interfacial tension between the two liquids is 2.0 dyn/cm, and the surface tension of n-heptyl alcohol is 23.0 dyn/cm. Calculate the value of the angle 7 in the figure. Which equation, IV-6 or IV-9, represents these data better Calculate the thickness of an infinite lens of isobutyl alcohol on water. [Pg.157]

Assume that an aqueous solute adsorbs at the mercury-water interface according to the Langmuir equation x/xm = bc/( + be), where Xm is the maximum possible amount and x/x = 0.5 at C = 0.3Af. Neglecting activity coefficient effects, estimate the value of the mercury-solution interfacial tension when C is Q.IM. The limiting molecular area of the solute is 20 A per molecule. The temperature is 25°C. [Pg.157]

IHP) (the Helmholtz condenser formula is used in connection with it), located at the surface of the layer of Stem adsorbed ions, and an outer Helmholtz plane (OHP), located on the plane of centers of the next layer of ions marking the beginning of the diffuse layer. These planes, marked IHP and OHP in Fig. V-3 are merely planes of average electrical property the actual local potentials, if they could be measured, must vary wildly between locations where there is an adsorbed ion and places where only water resides on the surface. For liquid surfaces, discussed in Section V-7C, the interface will not be smooth due to thermal waves (Section IV-3). Sweeney and co-workers applied gradient theory (see Chapter III) to model the electric double layer and interfacial tension of a hydrocarbon-aqueous electrolyte interface [27]. [Pg.179]

Neumann and co-workers have used the term engulfrnent to describe what can happen when a foreign particle is overtaken by an advancing interface such as that between a freezing solid and its melt. This effect arises in floatation processes described in Section Xni-4A. Experiments studying engulfrnent have been useful to test semiempirical theories for interfacial tensions [25-27] and have been used to estimate the surface tension of cells [28] and the interfacial tension between ice and water [29]. [Pg.352]

Using appropriate data from Table II-9, calculate the water-mercury interfacial tension using the simple Girifalco and Good equation and then using Fowkes modification of it. [Pg.381]

Estimate the interfacial tension gradient formed in alcohol-water mixtures as a function of alcohol content. Determine the minimum alcohol content necessary to form wine tears on a vertical glass wall [174] (experimental veriflcation is possible). [Pg.382]

Thus, adding surfactants to minimize the oil-water and solid-water interfacial tensions causes removal to become spontaneous. On the other hand, a mere decrease in the surface tension of the water-air interface, as evidenced, say, by foam formation, is not a direct indication that the surfactant will function well as a detergent. The decrease in yow or ysw implies, through the Gibb s equation (see Section III-5) adsorption of detergent. [Pg.485]

In addition to lowering the interfacial tension between a soil and water, a surfactant can play an equally important role by partitioning into the oily phase carrying water with it [232]. This reverse solubilization process aids hydrody-namically controlled removal mechanisms. The partitioning of surface-active agents between oil and water has been the subject of fundamental studies by Grieser and co-workers [197, 233]. [Pg.485]

Templeton obtained data of the following type for the rate of displacement of water in a 30-/im capillary by oil (n-cetane) (the capillary having previously been wet by water). The capillary was 10 cm long, and the driving pressure was 45 cm of water. When the meniscus was 2 cm from the oil end of the capillary, the velocity of motion of the meniscus was 3.6 x 10 cm/sec, and when the meniscus was 8 cm from the oil end, its velocity was 1 x 10 cm/sec. Water wet the capillary, and the water-oil interfacial tension was 30 dyn/cm. Calculate the apparent viscosities of the oil and the water. Assuming that both come out to be 0.9 of the actual bulk viscosities, calculate the thickness of the stagnant annular film of liquid in the capillary. [Pg.489]

It is quite clear, first of all, that since emulsions present a large interfacial area, any reduction in interfacial tension must reduce the driving force toward coalescence and should promote stability. We have here, then, a simple thermodynamic basis for the role of emulsifying agents. Harkins [17] mentions, as an example, the case of the system paraffin oil-water. With pure liquids, the inter-facial tension was 41 dyn/cm, and this was reduced to 31 dyn/cm on making the aqueous phase 0.00 IM in oleic acid, under which conditions a reasonably stable emulsion could be formed. On neutralization by 0.001 M sodium hydroxide, the interfacial tension fell to 7.2 dyn/cm, and if also made O.OOIM in sodium chloride, it became less than 0.01 dyn/cm. With olive oil in place of the paraffin oil, the final interfacial tension was 0.002 dyn/cm. These last systems emulsified spontaneously—that is, on combining the oil and water phases, no agitation was needed for emulsification to occur. [Pg.504]

One may rationalize emulsion type in terms of interfacial tensions. Bancroft [20] and later Clowes [21] proposed that the interfacial film of emulsion-stabilizing surfactant be regarded as duplex in nature, so that an inner and an outer interfacial tension could be discussed. On this basis, the type of emulsion formed (W/O vs. O/W) should be such that the inner surface is the one of higher surface tension. Thus sodium and other alkali metal soaps tend to stabilize O/W emulsions, and the explanation would be that, being more water- than oil-soluble, the film-water interfacial tension should be lower than the film-oil one. Conversely, with the relatively more oil-soluble metal soaps, the reverse should be true, and they should stabilize W/O emulsions, as in fact they do. An alternative statement, known as Bancroft s rule, is that the external phase will be that in which the emulsifying agent is the more soluble [20]. A related approach is discussed in Section XIV-5. [Pg.504]

Detergents may be produced by the chemical reaction of fats and fatty acids with polar materials such as sulfuric or phosphoric acid or ethylene oxide. Detergents emulsify oil and grease because of their abiUty to reduce the surface tension and contact angle of water as well as the interfacial tension between water and oil. Recent trends in detergents have been to lower phosphate content to prevent eutrification of lakes when detergents are disposed of in municipal waste. [Pg.135]


See other pages where Water interfacial tension is mentioned: [Pg.770]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.770]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.2376]    [Pg.2377]    [Pg.2574]    [Pg.2592]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.132]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.228 ]




SEARCH



Air-water interfacial tension

Interfacial tension

Interfacial tension at the oil-water

Interfacial tension at the oil-water interface

Interfacial tension monomer-water

Interfacial tension solute-water

Interfacial tension water-various liquids

Interfacial tension, water-toluene

Interfacial water

Mercury-water interfacial tension

Olive oil-water, interfacial tension

Particle-water interfacial tension

Phase Behavior and Interfacial Tension for Oil-Water-Surfactant Systems

Polymer/water interfacial tension

Water interface, interfacial tension

Water-hexadecane interfacial tension, effect

Water-hydrocarbon interfacial tension

Water/oil interfacial tension

© 2024 chempedia.info