Adsorption extent

Equilibria Competitive adsorption Extent of spatial entanglement Number of bound segments Adsorbed layer thickness Patchiness and bare spots Diffusion of single chains Evolution of structural rearrangements Segment-surface contact Ufe Lateral diffusion Diffusion through adsorbed layers Replacement of one species by another Effect of dynamic entanglement... 

In order to perform a quantitative analysis of particle desorption kinetics, an unequivocal measure of adsorption extent is necessary. Defining a variable for quantifying particle adsorption seems simpler than for molecular systems because the thickness of the layer where a considerable concentration increase takes place is much smaller than particle dimensions [1,2]. Moreover, the location of the interface can be better defined because the density gradient of the solvent usually has a negligible extension in comparison with particle dimensions. One can, therefore, accurately measure the position of adsorbed particles relative to the interface and define the extent of adsorption as... 

Surface defects (Section VII-4C) are also influenced by the history of the sample. Such imperfections may to some extent be reversibly affected by processes such as adsorption so that it is not safe to regard even a refractory solid as having fixed surface actions. Finally, solid surfaces are very easily contaminated detection of contamination is aided by ultra-high-vacuum techniques and associated cleaning protocols [24]. 

Adsorption at a charged surface where both electrostatic and speciflc chemical forces are involved has been discussed to some extent in connection with various other topics. These examples are drawn together here for a brief review along with some more speciflc additional material. The Stem equation, Eq. V-19, may be put in a form more analogous to the Langmuir equation, Eq. XI-4 ... 

All gases below their critical temperature tend to adsorb as a result of general van der Waals interactions with the solid surface. In this case of physical adsorption, as it is called, interest centers on the size and nature of adsorbent-adsorbate interactions and on those between adsorbate molecules. There is concern about the degree of heterogeneity of the surface and with the extent to which adsorbed molecules possess translational and internal degrees of freedom. 

Because of their prevalence in physical adsorption studies on high-energy, powdered solids, type II isotherms are of considerable practical importance. Bmnauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) [39] showed how to extent Langmuir s approach to multilayer adsorption, and their equation has come to be known as the BET equation. The derivation that follows is the traditional one, based on a detailed balancing of forward and reverse rates. 

The preceding material has been couched in terms of site energy distributions—the implication being that an adsorbent may have chemically different kinds of sites. This is not necessarily the case—if micropores are present (see Section XVII-16) adsorption in such may show an increased Q because the adsorbate experiences interaction with surrounding walls of adsorbent. To a lesser extent this can also be true for a nonporous but very rough surface. 

One application of the grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation method is in the study ol adsorption and transport of fluids through porous solids. Mixtures of gases or liquids ca separated by the selective adsorption of one component in an appropriate porous mate The efficacy of the separation depends to a large extent upon the ability of the materit adsorb one component in the mixture much more strongly than the other component, separation may be performed over a range of temperatures and so it is useful to be to predict the adsorption isotherms of the mixtures. 

The developer is generally a solvent in which the components of the mixture are not too soluble and is usually a solvent of low molecular weight. The adsorbent is selected so that the solvent is adsorbed somewhat but not too strongly if the solvent is adsorbed to some extent, it helps to ensure that the components of the mixture to be adsorbed will not be too firmly bound. Usually an adsorbate adheres to any one adsorbent more firmly in a less polar solvent, consequently when, as frequently occurs, a single dense adsorption zone is obtained with light petroleum and develops only slowly when washed with this solvent, the development may be accelerated by passing to a more polar solvent. Numerous adsorbat are broken up by methyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol or acetone. It is not generally necessary to employ the pure alcohol the addition from 0 5 to 2 per cent, to the solvent actually used suffices in most cases. 

An example of using one predicted property to predict another is predicting the adsorption of chemicals in soil. This is usually done by first predicting an octanol water partition coelficient and then using an equation that relates this to soil adsorption. This type of property-property relationship is most reliable for monofunctional compounds. Structure-property relationships, and to a lesser extent group additivity methods, are more reliable for multifunctional compounds than this type of relationship. 

The state of the surface is now best considered in terms of distribution of site energies, each of the minima of the kind indicated in Fig. 1.7 being regarded as an adsorption site. The distribution function is defined as the number of sites for which the interaction potential lies between and (rpo + d o)> various forms of this function have been proposed from time to time. One might expect the form ofto fio derivable from measurements of the change in the heat of adsorption with the amount adsorbed. In practice the situation is complicated by the interaction of the adsorbed molecules with each other to an extent depending on their mean distance of separation, and also by the fact that the exact proportion of the different crystal faces exposed is usually unknown. It is rarely possible, therefore, to formulate the distribution function for a given solid except very approximately. 

Type I component it does not denote any change in the heat of adsorption on the external surface, which remains constant in nature and extent throughout. 

Fig. 5.12 (a) Water adsorption isotherms at 20°C on Graphon activated to 24-9 % burn-off, where its active surface was covered to varying extents by oxygen complex. (b) The results of (a) plotted as amount adsorbed per of active surface area (left-hand scale) and also as number of molecules of water per atom of chemisorbed oxygen (right-hand scale). (After Walker.)... 

It would be difficult to over-estimate the extent to which the BET method has contributed to the development of those branches of physical chemistry such as heterogeneous catalysis, adsorption or particle size estimation, which involve finely divided or porous solids in all of these fields the BET surface area is a household phrase. But it is perhaps the very breadth of its scope which has led to a somewhat uncritical application of the method as a kind of infallible yardstick, and to a lack of appreciation of the nature of its basic assumptions or of the circumstances under which it may, or may not, be expected to yield a reliable result. This is particularly true of those solids which contain very fine pores and give rise to Langmuir-type isotherms, for the BET procedure may then give quite erroneous values for the surface area. If the pores are rather larger—tens to hundreds of Angstroms in width—the pore size distribution may be calculated from the adsorption isotherm of a vapour with the aid of the Kelvin equation, and within recent years a number of detailed procedures for carrying out the calculation have been put forward but all too often the limitations on the validity of the results, and the difficulty of interpretation in terms of the actual solid, tend to be insufficiently stressed or even entirely overlooked. And in the time-honoured method for the estimation of surface area from measurements of adsorption from solution, the complications introduced by... 

Aromatic and Nonaromatic Hydrocarbon Separation. Aromatics are partially removed from kerosines and jet fuels to improve smoke point and burning characteristics. This removal is commonly accompHshed by hydroprocessing, but can also be achieved by Hquid-Hquid extraction with solvents, such as furfural, or by adsorptive separation. Table 7 shows the results of a simulated moving-bed pilot-plant test using siHca gel adsorbent and feedstock components mainly in the C q—range. The extent of extraction does not vary gready for each of the various species of aromatics present. SiHca gel tends to extract all aromatics from nonaromatics (89). 

The method of action of the polymers is thought to be encapsulation of drill cuttings and exposed shales on the borehole wall by the nonionic materials, and selective adsorption of anionic polymers on positively charged sites of exposed clays which limits the extent of possible swelling. The latter method appears to be tme particularly for certain anionic polymers because of the low concentrations that can be used to achieve shale protection (8). 

Effect on Oxide—Water Interfaces. The adsorption (qv) of ions at clay mineral and rock surfaces is an important step in natural and industrial processes. SiUcates are adsorbed on oxides to a far greater extent than would be predicted from their concentrations (66). This adsorption maximum at a given pH value is independent of ionic strength, and maximum adsorption occurs at a pH value near the piC of orthosiUcate. The pH values of maximum adsorption of weak acid anions and the piC values of their conjugate acids are correlated. This indicates that the presence of both the acid and its conjugate base is required for adsorption. The adsorption of sihcate species is far greater at lower pH than simple acid—base equihbria would predict. 

Effects of Surfactants on Solutions. A surfactant changes the properties of a solvent ia which it is dissolved to a much greater extent than is expected from its concentration effects. This marked effect is the result of adsorption at the solution s iaterfaces, orientation of the adsorbed surfactant ions or molecules, micelle formation ia the bulk of the solution, and orientation of the surfactant ions or molecules ia the micelles, which are caused by the amphipathic stmcture of a surfactant molecule. The magnitude of these effects depends to a large extent on the solubiUty balance of the molecule. An efficient surfactant is usually relatively iasoluble as iadividual ions or molecules ia the bulk of a solution, eg, 10 to mol/L. 

With the help of equiUbrium constants, the extent of adsorption can be predicted as a function of pH and solution variables (7,25,43). Based on this model, the partitioning of metal ions and of ligands (organic and inorganic anions between water and pelagic clays and suspended particles) can be explained. 

Other Fiber Evaluation Methods. The extent of fiber separation (fiber openness) is an important evaluation criteria that is commonly measured by several techniques, namely ak permeabiUty, adsorbed gas volume, bulk density, and residence (compression and recovery). The adsorption and retention of kerosene is also used as a measure of fiber openness and fiber adsorption capacity (34). 

Surface Area. Overall catalyst surface area can be determined by the BET method mentioned eadier, but mote specific techniques are requited to determine a catalyst s active surface area. X-ray diffraction techniques can give data from which the average particle si2e and hence the active surface area may be calculated. Or, it may be necessary to find an appropriate gas or Hquid that will adsorb only on the active surface and to measure the extent of adsorption under controUed conditions. In some cases, it maybe possible to measure the products of reaction between a reactive adsorbent and the active site. Radioactively tagged materials are frequentiy usehil in this appHcation. Once a correlation has been estabHshed between either total or active surface area and catalyst performance (particulady activity), it may be possible to use the less costiy method for quaHty assurance purposes. 

---