Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

One more analogy

The fact that the electronic energy E (R) plays the role of the potential energy for oscillations represents not only the result of rather complex derivations, but is also natural and understandable. The nuclei keep together thanks to the electronic glue (we will come back to this in Chapter 8). Let us imagine two metallic balls (nuclei) in a block of transparent glue (electronic cloud), Fig. 6.1. [Pg.232]

This situation corresponds to a non-rotating system. If we admit rotation, we would have to take the effect of centrifugal force on the potential energy of the gum into account. This effect is analogous to the second term in eq. (6.25) for Vkj(R). [Pg.232]


There is still one more analogy to pharmacokinetics that our tank model affords. It was stated above that a mass of 0.05 x Cpi pg of drug is eliminated over the first second. This can be compared with Di, the entire mass of drug in the tank at time fi. Now ... [Pg.58]

One of the early syntheses of Doxifluridine (5) [63,64] commenced from Hoxuridine (4) which reacted with thionyl chloride to give cychc sulphite 51 (Scheme 10). Methanolysis of 51 upon treatment with sodium methylate gave 52, which was reduced with tributyltin to give 5. In an analogous approach, the compound 5 was prepared via iodide 53, in turn obtained from 4 in two steps (Scheme 11) [65]. It should be noted that direct transformation of 4 into the corresponding iodide was done with low yield of the product, hence the protection strategy was necessary to use. Bromide 54 was a key intermediate in one more analogous scheme [66]. [Pg.591]

The signiflcance of toxic metabolites is important in diverse metabolic situations (a) when a pathway results in the synthesis of a toxic or inhibitory metabolite, and (b) when pathways for the metabolism of two (or more) analogous substrates supplied simultaneously are incompatible due to the production of a toxic metabolite by one of the substrates. A number of examples are provided to illustrate these possibilities that have achieved considerable attention in the context of the biodegradation of chlorinated aromatic compounds (further discussion is given in Chapter 9, Part 1) ... [Pg.222]

Analytical methods must be capable of determining the a.i. and/or relevant metabolites in the presence of the sample matrix. Where the sample contains more than one isomer, analog, etc., of an a.i. or relevant metabolite, the method should distinguish between individual isomers/analogues where this is necessary for carrying out risk assessment. [Pg.33]

To conclude this section, we consider one more probable way for the stabilization of octahedral clusters, which, as was shown in the previous section, is characteristic of binuclear, trigonal-prismatic and, obviously, all types of technetium acido-clusters [10]. According to [12,77], all technetium clusters with an odd number of metallic electrons have shorter multiple M-M bonds than those in analogous structures, but with an even number of metallic electrons. In our opinion [10, 15], this effect of an odd number of metallic electrons is essentially analogous to the effect of the increase in M-M bond... [Pg.247]

Silapharmaka often exhibit a stronger drug efficiency compared to the carbon analoga. They are derived from the latter by replacing tetravalent carbon by tetravalent silicon at the bioactive center. This is one more nice example of the analogy between tetravalent carbon and silicon. [Pg.21]

There has been isolated an analog of streptomycin which contains one more hydroxyl group67 68 and is called hydroxystreptomycin. The biological properties of this compound are closely similar to, or identical with, those of streptomycin.69... [Pg.279]

As an analogous example, the behavior of sulfonium salts can be mentioned. At mercury electrodes, sulfonium salts bearing trialkyl (Colichman and Love 1953) or triaryl (Matsuo 1958) fragments can be reduced, with the formation of sulfur-centered radicals. These radicals are adsorbed on the mercury surface. After this, carboradicals are eliminated. The carboradicals capture one more electron and transform into carbanions. This is the final stage of reduction. The mercury surface cooperates with both the successive one-electron steps (Scheme 2.23 Luettringhaus and Machatzke 1964). This scheme is important for the problem of hidden adsorption, but it cannot be generalized in terms of stepwise versus concerted mechanism of dissociative electron transfer. As shown, the reduction of some sulfonium salts does follow the stepwise mechanism, but others are reduced according to the concerted mechanism (Andrieux et al. 1994). [Pg.105]

Equation (15.23) displays the feature of locality that the blending functions should possess in order to be computationally advantageous that is, during the process of matrix inversion, one wishes the calculation to proceed quickly. As mentioned earlier, the use of linear approximation functions results in at most five terms on the left side of the equation analogous to (15.23), yielding a much crader approximation, but one more easily calculated. The current choice of Bezier functions, on the other hand, is rapidly convergent for methods such as relaxation, possesses excellent continuity properties (the solution is guaranteed to look and behave reasonably), and does not require substantial computation. [Pg.267]

The stoichiometry determines the ratios of lithium aluminum hydride to other compounds to be reduced. Esters or tertiary amides treated with one hydride equivalent (one fourth of a molecule) of lithium aluminum hydride are reduced to the stage of aldehydes (or their nitrogen analogs). In order to reduce an ester to the corresponding alcohol, two hydride equivalents, i.e. 0.5 mol of lithium aluminum hydride, is needed since, after the reduction of the carbonyl, hydrogenolysis requires one more hydride equivalent. [Pg.18]

Considering that Q has the same block structure as D, one obtains analogously that if one takes A < (1 — n )(l — tip), and the R x R block of is positive, the Q-condition is fulfilled. Consequently, the D-condition is more restrictive than the Q-condition between orbitals with ONs close to zero, whereas for A elements between orbitals with ONs close to one, the Q-condition is predominant. [Pg.411]


See other pages where One more analogy is mentioned: [Pg.107]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.1034]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.208]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info