Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Acidic modifiers/buffers

Eluent components should be volatile. Solvents such as ethyl acetate, isopropyl ether, diethylketone, chloroform, dichloromethane, and toluene as modifiers and n-hexane as diluent are recommended for normal phase chromatography. For reversed-phase systems, methanol or acetonitrile are used as modifiers. Such components as acetic acid or buffers, as well as ion association reagents, should be avoided. [Pg.284]

Miniaturized columns have provided a decisive advantage in speed. Uracil, phenol, and benzyl alcohol were separated in 20 seconds by CEC in an 18 mm column with a propyl reversed phase.29 A19 cm electrophoretic channel was etched into a glass wafer, filled with a y-cyclodextrin buffer, and used to resolve chiral amino acids from a meteorite in 4 minutes.30 A 6 cm channel equipped with a syringe pump to automate sample derivatization was used to separate amino acids modified with fluorescein isothiocyanate.31 Nanovials have been used to perform tryptic digests on the 15 nL scale for subsequent separation on capillary Electrophoresis.32 A microcolumn has also been used to generate fractions representing time-points of digestion from a 40 pL sample.33 A disposable nanoelectrospray emitter has been... [Pg.429]

Immerse the alginate beads according to a modified method of Akert and Sandri (44) for 3,16, or 20 h at 4°C in the ZIO mixture, which consisted of 3.75% zinc (powder) and 1.25% resublimed iodine crystals in 50 mM 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulphonic acid-NaOH buffer (pH 5.8) containing 0.2 M glucose and 1% Os04 (MG buffer). [Pg.243]

Some commonly used buffers, such as sodium and potassium phosphate, are incompatible with ELSD, but there are ready alternatives. For example, ammonium acetate has similar buffering properties to potassium phosphate, and ammonium carbonate, ammonium formate, pyridinium acetate, and pyridinium formate are options for different pH ranges. Typical mobile phase modifiers that do not meet the volatility criteria can be replaced by a wide variety of more volatile alternates. For example, phosphoric acid, commonly used as an acid modifier fo control pH and ionization, can be replaced by trifluoroacetic acid other acids that are sufficiently volatile for use with FLSD include, acetic, carbonic, and formic acids. Triethylamine, commonly used as a base modifier, is compatible with FLSD other base modifiers that can be used are ethylamine, methylamine, and ammonium hydroxide [78]. [Pg.227]

D. Sales, D. Sae-Lee, S. Matsuya, I.D. Ana, Short-term fluoride and cations release from polyacid-modified composites in distilled water and an acidic lactate buffer. Biomaterials 21 (2003) 1687-1696. [Pg.378]

It was necessary to add over 10% buffer for the transesteiification of phosphatidyl choline by native lipase (5). Hydrolysis occurred as a side reaction in the hydrophobic solvent-water system. Tlie transesterification of phosphatidyl choline and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) was carried out in water-saturated n-hexane using palmitic acid-modified lipase. Table II shows the transesterification of phosphatidyl choline and EPA. Modified lipase made it possible for the transesterification of phospholipids in organic solvents. [Pg.177]

The present procedure is based on the method published by Fu, Birnbaum and Greenstein. The yields are increased by the very slow addition of an aqueous solution of sodium nitrite to the reaction mixture as well as by a modified work-up procedure, i.e., careful removal of nitrogen oxides and the final decomposition of their adducts with carboxylic acids by buffering with sodium carbonate. [Pg.156]

To achieve the optimum reversed-phase LC separation, one needs to explore variables such as the analyte chemistry, mobile-phase composition (solvent type, solvent composition, pH, and additives), column composition, column particle size, and column temperature. For pharmaceutical analysis using mass spectrometry, the chemistry of an analyte is rarely changed beyond manipulation of the mobile phase pH, and even there options are limited. Volatile pH modifiers (buffers) are still preferred for LC-MS, and concentrations of these modifiers are kept low. Relatively simply mobile phases consisting of water, acetonitrile, and either formic acid (0.1% v/v), ammonium acetate (1-20 mM), or both have been common. [Pg.49]

Solvent selection for HPLC-NMR-MS has to be a compromise between the ideal requirements of each instrument. Thus, for HPLC-NMR the use of inorganic buffers, e.g. sodium phosphate, for pH modification is preferred because no additional signals are introduced into the NMR spectrum although this type of buffer system is currently incompatible with most HPLC-MS systems using an electrospray interface. An alternative acidic modifier is tri-... [Pg.48]

Most tertiary isocratics in the literature only use a constant level of the third mobile phase as a polisher. Amines that tend to tail under neutral pH complicate the development. Moving to an end-capped column of adding a fixed amount of organic modifier will usually fix the problem. Acids can be handled by going to a lower pH using a fixed amount of acid to buffer pH. [Pg.177]

At the molecular level, the buffering capacity of the cellular solution may block the pollutant in its course. Pollutants that generate acids or bases may be neutralized by acid-base buffers. Excess calcium or other cations may complex fluoride, and redox systems may buffer S02, 03, or PAN, or the free radicals they generate. On another level, enzyme structure determines whether the pollutant will penetrate and react with an active site, and the functioning of an enzyme, apparently through effects on its structure, also modifies its susceptibility to the pollutant (6). Moreover, inhibition of a susceptible enzyme may not affect a pathway the enzyme affected may not be rate-limiting in a particular pathway, and considerably greater inhibition must occur before it is. [Pg.67]

The change in the mobile-phase pH of a particular buffer as a function of the organic compositions will be referred to as the pH shift in the following sections in this book. For acidic buffers/modifiers, the relative increase in the pH will be dependent upon the type and concentration of acidic modifier and... [Pg.174]

There are compatibility issues for chromatographic methods and NMR. Protic solvents such as water or methanol are usually replaced with deuterated solvents although solvent suppression algorithms can be used with shallow gradient methods. Organic modifiers such as ion-pair reagents must be avoided, and mineral acid based buffer systems are preferred (the opposite of the LC-MS situation).34... [Pg.355]

Figure S-IS. Comparison of retention factors for 4-ethylpyridine as a function of pH using three different acidic modifiers. Column 150 x 4.6 mm Zorbax XDB-C18. Mobile phase acetonitrile - 10 mM. sodium phosphate buffer adjusted with trifluoroacetic acid, (10 90) flow rate 1.0 ml/min 25 C, UV 2.54 nm, sample 1 pi injection. Figure S-IS. Comparison of retention factors for 4-ethylpyridine as a function of pH using three different acidic modifiers. Column 150 x 4.6 mm Zorbax XDB-C18. Mobile phase acetonitrile - 10 mM. sodium phosphate buffer adjusted with trifluoroacetic acid, (10 90) flow rate 1.0 ml/min 25 C, UV 2.54 nm, sample 1 pi injection.
We should mention that the actual pH of the organic-buffer mixture is not the same as the pH of the buffer alone. Below is a comparison of values for a series of different basic components obtained from the literature (Table 5-5, column 2) and p/f experimental values measured using the technique described above with three different acidic modifiers. [Pg.154]

Figure 5-30. Effect on retention of aniline when perchloric acid was used as the acidic modifier through the pH range 1.3-7.1. Column 15 x 0.46 cm Zorhax XDB-C18 mobile phase acetonitrile 10 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer adjusted with perchloric acid pH 1.38.6 (90 10) flow rate 1.0 ml/min 25 "C UV 254 nm sample 1 pi injection. Figure 5-30. Effect on retention of aniline when perchloric acid was used as the acidic modifier through the pH range 1.3-7.1. Column 15 x 0.46 cm Zorhax XDB-C18 mobile phase acetonitrile 10 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer adjusted with perchloric acid pH 1.38.6 (90 10) flow rate 1.0 ml/min 25 "C UV 254 nm sample 1 pi injection.
An example of addition of organic modifiers decreasing EOF was presented by Kanitsar et al. [202] for the effect of various organic additives on the separation of three carboxylic acids. Separation buffers consisting of 15% v/v solvent to pH 6.0, 25 mM KH2PO4 and 0.75 mM TTAB buffer were used in conjunction with benzyl alcohol, as the neutral marker, for EOF determination. For the... [Pg.207]

For example, it has been demonstrated that normal SEC behavior can be obtained for polymethyl vinyl ether-comaleic acid using a mobile phase consisting a of pH 9 buffer system [prepared from tris(hydro-xymethyl) aminomethane and nitric acid] modified with 0.2 M LiNOj (5). Halide salts should be completely avoided they tend to corrode the stainless steel inner surfaces of the SEC system, which in turn causes injector fouling and column contamination. [Pg.6]

A few reports are available on chiral separations of pollutants using this modality of liquid chromatography. The separated chiral pollutants are 2-(2-chlorophenoxy)propionic acid and 2-(4-chlorophenoxy)propionic acid on n-alkyl-)8-D-glucopyranoside [17], ibuprofens on vancomycin [18] and PCBs on y-cyclodextrin [19]. Marina etal. [20] reported chiral separations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 45, 84, 88, 91, 95, 132, 136, 139, 149, 171, 183 and 196 by MEKC using cyclodextrin chiral selectors. Mixtures of and y-cyclodextrins were used as chiral modifiers in a 2-(yV-cyclohexylamino)ethanesulfonic acid (CHES) buffer containing urea and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelles. A mixture of PCBs 45, 88, 91, 95, 136, 139, 149 and 196 was separated into all 16 enantiomers in an... [Pg.277]

Particularly interesting is the mixture of an acid and a base, wherein we must then explicitly model the change in pfC of the base and mobile phase. Initially, we consider the aqueous systems that are shown in Fig. 4a and b. These are the pH/retention factors for an acid and a base with no acetonitrile. Based on this, the pH choices could be either less than 2.5, or more than 7.5. Most chromato-graphers would elect to choose a pH of 2.5 or so. However, if we are going to use an appreciable concentration of an organic modifier, the picture changes. If we assume that we are going to prepare an acid-based buffer, the elution profile for the acid remains the same however, for the base, the pH shift will be in opposite directions for buffer and analyte. The elution profile will shift. [Pg.96]


See other pages where Acidic modifiers/buffers is mentioned: [Pg.176]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.1273]    [Pg.1166]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.1760]    [Pg.1904]    [Pg.1172]    [Pg.1094]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.452]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.174 , Pg.175 , Pg.176 ]




SEARCH



Acid) buffer

Acidic buffering

Acidic buffers

Acidic modifiers/buffers acetate buffer

Acidic modifiers/buffers acetic/formic acids

Acidic modifiers/buffers analyte retention

Acidic modifiers/buffers modifier concentration, effect

Acidic modifiers/buffers system

Acids buffering

Buffered acids

Modifier acidic

© 2024 chempedia.info