Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Work flux, equation

Equations 8.5.1.3 are quite general they involve no assumptions regarding the constancy of particular matrices they apply to mixtures with any number of components and for any relationship between the fluxes. It is at this point where any assumptions necessary to solve Eqs. (8.5.1-8.5.3) must be made. In the three methods to be discussed below we proceed in exactly the same way as we did when deriving the exact solution and the solution to the linearized equations first obtain the composition profiles, then differentiate to obtain the gradients at the film boundary, and combine the result with Eq. 8.5.3 to obtain the working flux equations. [Pg.197]

Ac Che limic of Knudsen screaming Che flux relacions (5.25) determine Che fluxes explicitly in terms of partial pressure gradients, but the general flux relacions (5.4) are implicic in Che fluxes and cheir solution does not have an algebraically simple explicit form for an arbitrary number of components. It is therefore important to identify the few cases in which reasonably compact explicit solutions can be obtained. For a binary mixture, simultaneous solution of the two flux equations (5.4) is straightforward, and the result is important because most experimental work on flow and diffusion in porous media has been confined to pure substances or binary mixtures. The flux vectors are found to be given by... [Pg.42]

Following Sadler [161] (the details were not included in his work) consider a row model in which all the stems except the outermost are of the same length, h, as shown in Fig. 4.9. A new stem can only be initiated when the outermost stem has reached a height h. A set of flux equations may be written as ... [Pg.303]

The irreversibility accompanying a steady flow process may be computed for any zone by noting the fluxes of entropy into and out of the zone. Leaving aside the problems posed by semi-permeable membranes, which introduce ambiguities into the meanings of heat and work, (2), equation (3) provides such a balance ... [Pg.216]

In using equation (6) work flux is taken as equal to exergic flux. Heat flux is multiplied by the Carnot ratio to obtain its exergic flux, i.e. [Pg.217]

Formally, it will be even necessary to make corrections already in the starting flux equations. The detailed formulation of linear irreversible thermodynamics also includes coupling terms (cross terms) obeying the Onsager reciprocity relation. They take into account that the flux of a defect k may also depend on the gradient of the electrochemical potential of other defects. This concept has been worked out, in particular, for the case of the ambipolar transport of ions and electrons.230... [Pg.117]

With these relations, the combined films and interface is regarded as an effective interface . There is no need to assume phase equilibrium between liquid and vapour. The entropy production rate can alternatively be expressed by the measurable heat flux in the vapour and fluxes of mass. - This set of flux equations was used to explain the entropy production in tray distillation columns. However, it has not yet been used for predictive purposes. Much work remains to be done to include these equations in a software that is useful for industrial purposes. [Pg.6]

The simple carrier of Fig. 6 is the simplest model which can account for the range of experimental data commonly found for transport systems. Yet surprisingly, it is not the model that is conventionally used in transport studies. The most commonly used model is some or other form of Fig. 7. In contrast to the simple carrier, the model of Fig. 7, the conventional carrier, assumes that there exist two forms of the carrier-substrate complex, ES, and ES2, and that these can interconvert by the transitions with rate constants g, and g2- Now, our experience with the simple- and complex-pore models should lead to an awareness of the problems in making such an assumption. The transition between ES, and ES2 is precisely such a transition as cannot be identified by steady-state experiments, if the carrier can complex with only one species of transportable substrate. Lieb and Stein [2] have worked out the full kinetic analysis of the conventional carrier model. The derived unidirectional flux equation is exactly equivalent to that derived for the simple carrier Eqn. 30, although the experimentally determinable parameters involving K and R terms have different meanings in terms of the rate constants (the b, /, g and k terms). The appropriate values for the K and R terms in terms of the rate constants are listed in column 3 of Table 3. Thus the simple carrier and the conventional carrier behave identically in... [Pg.142]

We find then that Eqs. (12.29) through (12.31) are sufficient for computing the correct second moment of the flux. Equations (12.22) through (12.24) show that, by working with the transformed equations, only the first two terms of the series (12.13) for the flux are required to obtain the second moment and, therefore, the generalized age accurately. [Pg.756]

The second step is to work out the fluxes within each zone, and the reactions at the zone boundaries. Assuming that still has the value 1 adjacent to C, and introducing the constraints imposed on the Vvij in the mantle by equilibriimi with B, the flux equations in the inner part of the mantle become... [Pg.391]

The above alternative scenario development for liquid-to-gas phase chemical transport has a long history of successful application in the area of chemical separation in the chemical process industries (Bird et al., 2002). It gives support to the assumptions behind the interface compartment concept. However, the resistance-in-series algorithm shown in Equation 4.16 will work correctly only if the flux equations are of the diffusive concentration-difference-type. [Pg.64]

Equation 7.1 -2 is the most useful form of the multicomponent flux equations. Because of an excess of theoretical zeal, many who work in this area have nurtured a glut of alternatives. These zealots most commonly use different driving forces or reference... [Pg.212]

In unsteady states the situation is less satisfactory, since stoichiometric constraints need no longer be satisfied by the flux vectors. Consequently differential equations representing material balances can be constructed only for binary mixtures, where the flux relations can be solved explicitly for the flux vectors. This severely limits the scope of work on the dynamical equations and their principal field of applicacion--Che theory of stability of steady states. The formulation of unsteady material and enthalpy balances is discussed in Chapter 12, which also includes a brief digression on stability problems. [Pg.5]

One of Che earliest examples of a properly conceived experimental investigation of the flux relations for a porous medium is provided by the work of Gunn and King [53] on the dusty gas model equations, and the following discussion is based largely on their work. Since all their experiments were performed on binary mixtures, the appropriate flux relations are (5.26) and (5,27). Writing... [Pg.89]

In general, tests have tended to concentrate attention on the ability of a flux model to interpolate through the intermediate pressure range between Knudsen diffusion control and bulk diffusion control. What is also important, but seldom known at present, is whether a model predicts a composition dependence consistent with experiment for the matrix elements in equation (10.2). In multicomponent mixtures an enormous amount of experimental work would be needed to investigate this thoroughly, but it should be possible to supplement a systematic investigation of a flux model applied to binary systems with some limited experiments on particular multicomponent mixtures, as in the work of Hesse and Koder, and Remick and Geankoplia. Interpretation of such tests would be simplest and most direct if they were to be carried out with only small differences in composition between the two sides of the porous medium. Diffusion would then occur in a system of essentially uniform composition, so that flux measurements would provide values for the matrix elements in (10.2) at well-defined compositions. [Pg.101]

Thus the key experimental observation Equation (7.11), is satisfied in presence of spillover. When an external overpotential AUWR is applied, with a concomitant current, I, and O2 flux I/2F, although UWR is not fixed anymore by the Nemst equation but by the extremally applied potential, still the work function Ow will be modified and Equations (7.11) and (7.12), will remain valid as long as ion spillover is fast relative to the electrochemical charge transfer rate I/2F.21 This is the usual case in solid state electrochemistry (Figs. 7.3b, 7.3d) as experimentally observed (Figs. 5.35, 5.23, 7.4, 7.6-7.9). [Pg.350]

The development of the theory of solute diffusion in soils was largely due to the work of Nye and his coworkers in the late sixties and early seventies, culminating in their essential reference work (5). They adapted the Fickian diffusion equations to describe diffusion in a heterogeneous porous medium. Pick s law describes the relationship between the flux of a solute (mass per unit surface area per unit time, Ji) and the concentration gradient driving the flux. In vector terms. [Pg.330]

In work by Okada et al. (03) on a rotating-disk flow, Eqs. (10a) and (10b) in Table VII, the electrolyte was completely enclosed between the rotating disk and the counterelectrode. Mass transfer was measured at the rotating as well as at the stationary disk, and the distance between disks was varied. At low rotation rates, the flux at the rotating disk was higher than predicted by the Levich equation, Eq. (la) in Table VII. The flux at the stationary disk followed a relation of the Levich type, but with a constant roughly two-thirds that in the rotating-disk equation. [Pg.274]

The combined diffusivity is, of course, defined as the ratio of the molar flux to the concentration gradient, irrespective of the mechanism of transport. The above equation was derived by separate groups working independently (8-10). It is important to recognize that the molar fluxes (Ni) are defined with respect to a fixed catalyst pellet rather than to a plane of no net transport. Only when there is equimolar counterdiffusion, do the two types of flux definitions become equivalent. For a more detailed discussion of this point, the interested readers should consult Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot (11). When there is equimolal counterdiffusion NB = —NA and... [Pg.434]

Less obviously, perhaps, the second law of thermodynamics assures us that the intensity, 1(A), is also constant along the beam, for if this were not the case, then it would be possible to focus all the radiation from a hot body onto a part of itself, increasing the radiation flux onto that portion and raising its temperature of that portion without doing work - a violation of the second law. The constancy of beam energy and intensity has other consequences, some of which are familiar to most of us. If we solve equation 29-3 for the product (den da) we get ... [Pg.143]

Table 1.1 Conjugate pairs of variables in work terms for the fundamental equation for the internal energy U. Here/is force of elongation, Z is length in the direction of the force, <7 is surface tension, As is surface area, , is the electric potential of the phase containing species i, qi is the contribution of species i to the electric charge of a phase, E is electric field strength, p is the electric dipole moment of the system, B is magnetic field strength (magnetic flux density), and m is the magnetic moment of the system. The dots indicate scalar products of vectors. Table 1.1 Conjugate pairs of variables in work terms for the fundamental equation for the internal energy U. Here/is force of elongation, Z is length in the direction of the force, <7 is surface tension, As is surface area, <Z>, is the electric potential of the phase containing species i, qi is the contribution of species i to the electric charge of a phase, E is electric field strength, p is the electric dipole moment of the system, B is magnetic field strength (magnetic flux density), and m is the magnetic moment of the system. The dots indicate scalar products of vectors.

See other pages where Work flux, equation is mentioned: [Pg.426]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.141]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.217 ]




SEARCH



Working equations

© 2024 chempedia.info