Water physico-chemical parameter

Fig. 5 Main contamination sources identified by PCA for sediments, fish, and suface water in the Ebro River basin, and explained variances for each principal component. Variable identification. Organic compounds in sediments 1, summatory of hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) 2, summa-tory of DDTs (DDTs) 3, hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 4, hexachlorobutadiene (HCBu) 5, summatory of trichlorobenzenes (TCBs) 6, naphthalene 7, fluoranthene 8, benzo(a)pyrene 9, benzo(b) fluoranthene 10, benzo(g,h,i)perylene 11, benzo(k)fluoranthene 12, indene(l,2,3-cd)pyrene. Organic compounds in fish 1, hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 2, summatory of hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) 3, o,p-DDD 4, o,p-DDE 5, o,p-DDT 6, p,p-DDD 7, />,/>DDE 8, />,/>DDT 9, summatory of DDTs (DDTs) 10, summatory of trichlorobenzenes (TCBs) 11, hexachlorobutadiene (HCBu) 12, fish length. Physico-chemical parameters in water 1, alkalinity 2, chlorides 3, cyanides 4, total coliforms 5, conductivity at 20°C 6, biological oxygen demand 7, chemical oxygen demand 8, fluorides 9, suspended matter 10, total ammonium 11, nitrates 12, dissolved oxygen 13, phosphates 14, sulfates 15, water temperature 16, air temperature...

Solid samples of tailings material were collected from different depths (2 - 18 m) in drill cores. Precipitates were collected from different locations in the stream bed. Water samples were taken from a well situated in the tailings pond, at three different effluent points on the downstream face of the tailings dam, and also at 30 m as well as 50 m downstream. The physico-chemical parameters of the water were measured during sampling. 

The risk posed by the potential to concentrate into sediments was approached similarly to the aquatic compartment, i.e. using a PEC/PNEC ratio (Table 3.2). When no actual effect data on sediment organisms were available, PNECs in sediments were estimated on the basis of physico-chemical parameters and PNECs in water [1]. The risk posed by the potential to bioconcentrate in fish was assessed by the methodology described by Nendza et al. [2] with the determination of the critical body burden (CBB). This parameter predicts the level of the chemical in the organism which could... 

Pravdic, V., 3ednacak-Biscan, J. and 3uracic, M., 1981. Physico-chemical parameters describing the role of particulate materials in estuarine waters in River Inputs to Ocean Systems. 3.M. Martin, D. Eisma and 3.D. Burton (eds). UNEP and UNESCO, pp. 188-196. 

Drollet, J. H., Teai, T., Faucon, M., and Martin, P. M. V., Field study of compensatory changes in UV-absorbing compounds in the mucus of the solitary coral Fungia repanda (Scleractinia Fungiidae) in relation to solar UV radiation, sea-water temperature, and other coincident physico-chemical parameters, Mar. Freshwater Res., 48, 329, 1997. 

The bioconcentration factor (BCF) is an expensive and difficult test and can be replaced by an estimation of relative lipophilicity of the material, the partition coefficient (log P). This physico-chemical parameter (log P) is determined by measuring the distribution ratio of the material between octanol and water (Droy, 1993 McKim et al., 1985). The logarithm of this ratio is the partition coefficient (log P) however, materials with a log P of <1 or > 6 or 7 are not expected to bioconcentrate. Graphic representation of the relationship between the octanol-water partition coefficient, log P, and predicted bioconcentration, log BCF, has the... 

Both the effect of self-association and the presence of salt-type associates 2 [Eq.(28)] may modulate the physico-chemical parameters measured in solution. To reduce the perturbing dominance of these effects as far as possible, high dilution of the anhydrous sample 1 should be used and the water in the solvent should be reduced (1II,B,C and E). 

Water samples were taken at both raw water and treated water sites. Some general physico-chemical parameters of the 4 water types concerned are summarized in Table 1. 

Table 2.3.1 Main physico-chemical parameters of waters and their possible standardization...

As described previously, the deconvolution method of UV spectra allows to measure quantitative parameters (nitrates, surfactants for example) as well as to estimate some physico-chemical parameters (TOC, COD, BOD5, TSS). The obtained information (qualitative and quantitative) are enough relevant and robust to be integrated in the decision making process and water resources management. Indeed, the performances of Portable UV spectrophotometer have been evaluated and compared to a reference method and have shown good correlation (Gonzalez et al., 2007). In addition, performance criteria have been verified in field conditions in order to assess the impact of these conditions and to demonstrate the portability of the instrument. 

In order to improve the spatial and temporal variability of water quality along Orlice River, the portable UV instrument and some chemical test kits (NH4 measurement) have been deployed increasing the frequency of physico-chemical parameter measurements. 

This portable instrument could be easily used to characterize in field conditions the water bodies (not only for lakes but also rivers, and groundwater) on the basis of physico-chemical parameters. 

The given examples presented in this section illustrated the potential of UV spectrophotometry for improving information on the quality of water bodies and highlighted the perspectives of their integration on new approaches on water management. The portable instrument is in particular useful for the spatial and temporal water quality survey (river basin, lake...) based on measurements of some well-known physico-chemical parameters (TSS, TOC, COD, BOD, NO3-, surfactants). Nevertheless, the UV spectrophotometry and the suitable software developed to enhance the deconvolution of UV spectra allows to propose others applications, in particular qualitative interpretation in order to assess, for example, the trophic states of lakes. 

Correlation between lag phase (hours) and cell growth at 24 h (log) for Staphylococcus aureus and physico-chemical parameters measured for BHI (black circles) and BHliNaCl 1 1 mixture (white triangles) water activity, population of bound water (Pbw)/ NMR relaxation rate (Ri),... 

Environmental risk assessment has to address all compartments of the environment like air, water, sediment and soil. The partition of a substance between the various compartments is controlled by the physico-chemical parameters of a substance. Water-soluble or dispersible surfactants and emulsifiers will predominantly affect the water and sediments. As surfactants are widely used not only in manifold industrial applications but also in consumer products the pollution is widely dispersed. The contribution of surfactants used in polymer production is comparably rather small but has nevertheless to be controlled and monitored. 

Classical cell physiology takes into account the effects of both ionic and nonionic solutes (for instance, in calculations of osmotic properties). Only fairly recently, however, has it become clear that physico-chemical parameters based on bulk measurements fail to account for many of the properties of large surface-to-volume-ratio systems. The explanation for these differences, which can be pronounced, must be sought in the long-range effects of interfaces on the structure and properties of water and aqueous solutions. 

The evolution of the physico-chemical parameters is presented in Fig. 5. Close to the source, the dilution of the river can be noted with water of low mineralisation. An increase of dissolved oxygen expressed as saturation percentage is observed, as well as an increase in the pH values downstream. 

Figure 5. Evolution of physico-chemical parameters (average water temperature = 25° C).

UV spectra of the different samples, taken in summer 2000, are shown on Fig. 13, and the results of physico-chemical parameters are given in Table 2. The results obviously confirm the great difference of water quality between seawater and freshwater. 

In order to assess the magnitude of the chemical pressure to which bodies of surface water are subjected. Member States shall monitor for all priority substances and other pollutants discharged in significant amounts. In addition, physico-chemical parameters relevant for reliable interpretation of the results of chemical measurements (e.g., DOC, Ca, SPM content) should be measured. 

Article 8, paragraph 3 of the WFD requires that technical specifications and standardised methods for analysis and monitoring of water status be laid down in accordance with the procedure given in Article 21. Moreover, Annex V. 1.3.6 of the WFD states that the standards for monitoring of quality elements for physico-chemical parameters shall be any relevant CEN/ISO standards or such other national or international standards, which will ensure the provision of data of an equivalent scientific quality and comparability. 

Table B. Physico-Chemical Parameters (in relation to the water s natural structure)...

---