Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wastewater Treatment Operator

Data management system for wastewater treatment operators. [Pg.302]

The pollutants of concern are the same as in wet basic oxygen furnaces, but the concentration of metals (primarily lead and zinc, but also arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, and selenium) in wastewater is higher because of the higher percentage of scrap charged. Wastewater treatment operations are similar to those for the wet basic oxygen furnaces, including sedimentation in clarifiers or thickeners and recycle of the water.14... [Pg.55]

Electrolytic refining does produce wastewaters that must be treated and discharged, reused, or disposed in some manner. Many facilities use a wastewater treatment operation to treat these wastes. [Pg.85]

AESF. April 1989. " "Live" at the AESF/EPA Conference The Wastewater Treatment Operators Forum." Plating and Surface Finishing. Vol. 76, No. 4. P. 27. [Pg.73]

Secondary wastewater treatment operates under (aerobic/anaerobic) conditions. [Pg.248]

Alley, E. R. 2007. Water Quality Control Handbook, 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill. The second edition of this handbook includes expanded coverage of treatment systems for specific pollutants, the latest water quality regulations, and new content on wastewater treatment operations, membrane treatment processes, and cost-saving treatment design methods. [Pg.292]

Sludge Management. Sludge management represents about half of wastewater treatment operation and maintenance (O M) costs. The ultimate disposal of sludges produced by either pretreatment or joint treatment operations is an important consideration. The POTW must be aware of effects on the environment that may result from sludge disposal. Pretreatment facilities normally... [Pg.53]

The capital cost of most aqueous waste treatment operations is proportional to the total flow of wastewater, and the operating cost increases with decreasing concentration for a given mass of contaminant to be removed. Thus, if two streams require different treatment operations, it makes no sense to mix them and treat both streams in both treatment operations. This will increase both capital and operating costs. Rather, the streams should be segregated and treated separately in a distributed effluent treatment system. Indeed, effective primary treatment might mean that some streams do not need biological treatment at all. [Pg.310]

All process Hcensors also feature wastewater treatment systems. Stamicarbon guarantees the lowest NH —urea content and has plants in operation confirming the low NH —urea (1 ppm NH —1 ppm urea). This water is very satisfactory to use as boiler feed water. See Figures 16 and 17 for this system. [Pg.308]

Chevron s WWT (wastewater treatment) process treats refinery sour water for reuse, producing ammonia and hydrogen sulfide [7783-06-04] as by-products (100). Degassed sour water is fed to the first of two strippers. Here hydrogen sulfide is stripped overhead while water and ammonia flow out the column bottoms. The bottoms from the first stripper is fed to the second stripper which produces ammonia as the overhead product. The gaseous ammonia is next treated for hydrogen sulfide and water removal, compressed, and further purified. Ammonia recovery options include anhydrous Hquid ammonia, aqueous Hquid ammonia, and ammonia vapor for incineration. There are more than 20 reported units in operation, the aimual production of ammonia from this process is about 200,000 t. [Pg.359]

EPA has also developed pretreatment standards for industrial faciHties that discharge directiy to pubHcly owned treatment works (POTWs). The three types of pollutants of principal concern are pollutants that interfere with the operation of the POTW, pollutants that contaminate the sludges produced in the POTW, and pollutants that pass through the POTW or that are otherwise incompatible. One particular concern is volatile contaminants that can be stripped into the air during conventional wastewater treatment and become air pollution problems. These pretreatment standards are included in the effluent guidelines for the different industries. [Pg.76]

RO, primarily used ia the dairy iadustry, is expanding iato other areas of food processiag. RO can be used for a variety of operations, ranging from wastewater treatment and material recovery to clarification and concentration. Material recovery is advantageous for two reasons. By recovering valuable products, eg, proteias, from waste streams, profits can be iacreased while costs for waste disposal decreased. An excellent review of the different apphcations ofRO ia food processiag is available (9). [Pg.155]

The final loose end in the process is the aqueous decanter product, A7. The hexane must be removed before the mixture can be sent to wastewater treatment, ie, accepted as a water by-product. Two opportunistic separations. Fractionators 12 and 13, are possible. Selection of Fractionator 13 gives pure water underflow, and a distillate similar to D5. Distillate D13 can be recycled back and mixed with D5 without affecting the operation of Mixer 1. AH streams are processed and the flow sheet produces both desired products (Fig. 5b). [Pg.456]

C. E. Adams, Jr., D. L. Pord, and W. Wesley Eckenfelder, Jr., Development of Design and Operational Criteriafor Wastewater Treatment, Enviro Press, Inc., Nashville, Term., 1981. [Pg.174]

Over the past decade, water pollution control has progressed from an art to a science. Increased emphasis has been placed on the removal of secondary pollutants, such as nutrients and refractory organics, and on water reuse for industrial and agricultural purposes. This in turn has generated both fundamental and appHed research, which has improved both the design and operation of wastewater treatment faciUties. [Pg.221]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Process Control Manualfor Aerobic Biological Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Office of Water Program Operations, Washington, D.C., EPA-430/9—77—006, 1977. [Pg.229]

A notable example of controlled water reuse was utilization of secondary sewage effluent from the Back River Wastewater Treatment Plant in Baltimore by the Sparrows Point Works of Bethlehem Steel (6). The Sparrows Point plant was suppHed primarily by weUs located near the brackish waters of Baltimore harbor. Increased draft on the weUs had led to saltwater intmsion. Water with chloride concentration as high as 10 mg/L is unsuitable for many steelmaking operations. Rollers, for example, are pitted by such waters. However, treated effluent from the Back River Plant can be used for some operations, such as coke quenching, and >4 x 10 m /d (10 gal/d) are piped 13 km to Sparrows Point. This arrangement has proved economical to both parties for >40 yr. [Pg.291]

Pulp bleaching with chlorine dioxide is most often performed at an acidic pH, so that the final pH of the bleach Hquor is in the range of 2—5. Under these conditions, the residual concentration of chlorite and chlorate ions in the bleach Hquor are minimized and chloride ion is the predominant chlorine species in the spent bleach (77). In addition to direct addition to pulp in bleaching, chlorine dioxide also finds use in wastewater treatment from pulp mill operations as a means to remove effluent color (85). [Pg.484]

In 1980, approximately 111,000 t of synthetic organic dyestuffs were produced in the United States alone. In addition, another 13,000 t were imported. The largest consumer of these dyes is the textile industry accounting for two-thirds of the market (246). Recent estimates indicate 12% of the synthetic textile dyes used yearly are lost to waste streams during dyestuff manufacturing and textile processing operations. Approximately 20% of these losses enter the environment through effluents from wastewater treatment plants (3). [Pg.384]

Much of the experience and data from wastewater treatment has been gained from municipal treatment plants. Industrial liquid wastes are similar to wastewater but differ in significant ways. Thus, typical design parameters and standards developed for municipal wastewater operations must not be blindly utilized for industrial wastewater. It is best to run laboratory and small pilot tests with the specific industrial wastewater as part of the design process. It is most important to understand the temporal variations in industrial wastewater strength, flow, and waste components and their effect on the performance of various treatment processes. Industry personnel in an effort to reduce cost often neglect laboratory and pilot studies and depend on waste characteristics from similar plants. This strategy often results in failure, delay, and increased costs. Careful studies on the actual waste at a plant site cannot be overemphasized. [Pg.2213]


See other pages where Wastewater Treatment Operator is mentioned: [Pg.55]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.1721]    [Pg.1726]    [Pg.1744]    [Pg.2186]    [Pg.2212]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.222 ]




SEARCH



213 wastewater operator

Wastewater treatment

© 2024 chempedia.info