Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Volatilization direct measures

Volatility can be characterized either indirectly, by measurement of the flash point (the temperature to which the oil must be heated for inflammation of its vapor to become possible) or by direct measurement, following the Noack method. [Pg.283]

Evidence for consistent, positive metaboHc effects of feeding antibiotics is fragmented and inconclusive. Direct measurement of increased uptake of nutrients, ie, in vivo amino acids, glucose, or volatile fatty acids in mminants, have not been reported. [Pg.411]

The relative volatility, a, is a direct measure of the ease of separation by distillation. If a = 1, then component separation is impossible, because the hquid-and vapor-phase compositions are identical. Separation by distillation becomes easier as the value of the relative volatihty becomes increasingly greater than unity. Distillation separations having a values less than 1.2 ate relatively difficult those which have values above 2 are relatively easy. [Pg.156]

Other important properties include Hash point, volatility, viscosity, specific gravity, cloud point, pour point, and smoke point. Most of these properties are related directly to the boiling range of the kerosene and are not independently variable. The flash point, an index of fire hazard, measures the readiness of a fuel to ignite when exposed to a flame. It is usually mandated by law or government regulation to be 120° or 130° F (48° or 72° C), Volatility, as measured... [Pg.689]

The simplest analytical method is direct measurement of arsenic in volatile methylated arsenicals by atomic absorption [ 11 ]. A slightly more complicated system, but one that permits differentiation of the various forms of arsenic, uses reduction of the arsenic compounds to their respective arsines by treatment with sodium borohydride. The arsines are collected in a cold trap (liquid nitrogen), then vaporised separately by slow warming, and the arsenic is measured by monitoring the intensity of an arsenic spectral line, as produced by a direct current electrical discharge [1,12,13]. Essentially the same method was proposed by Talmi and Bostick [10] except that they collected the arsines in cold toluene (-5 °C), separated them on a gas chromatography column, and used a mass spectrometer as the detector. Their method had a sensitivity of 0.25 xg/l for water samples. [Pg.457]

The boiling point may be taken as an indication of the volatility of a material. Thus, in the case of a flammable liquid also the boiling point can be a direct measure of the hazard involved in its use. (Sax, 1979)... [Pg.48]

Volatility A measure of how readily a substance will vaporize. Volatility is directly related to vapor pressure. [Pg.338]

Dallas, C.E., Bruckner, XV, Maedgen, J.L. and Weir, F.W. (1986). A method for direct measurement of systemic uptake and elimination of volatile organics in small animals. J. Pharmacol. Methods 16 239-250. [Pg.359]

Wallace LA, Pellizzari E, Hartwell T, et al. 1984. Personal exposure to volatile organic compounds. I. Direct measurements in breathing-zone air, drinking water, food, and exhaled breath. Environ Res 35 293-319. [Pg.135]

Zweidinger R, Erickson M, Cooper S, et al. 1982. Direct measurement of volatile organic compounds in breathing-zone air, drinking water, breath, blood, and urine. Washington, DC US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 600/4-82-015. [Pg.136]

Most explosive detection equipments do not truly detect explosive vapour, rather they key on minute particles of the explosive [11]. The reason for this is that most explosives have very low vapour pressure, and low vapour pressures are rather difficult to measure. Methods based on mass loss or the direct measurement of tiny pressures are particularly prone to the influence of trace impurities of more volatile substances. Consequendy, the values reported in the literature exhibit a high degree of scatter. To add to the confusion, difierent units of measurement are used. In general, measurements involving chemical determination of the amount of the specific compound in the vapour phase are to be preferred. If several difierent values are reported, and there is no better criterion for selection, it is probably best to take the lowest value. [Pg.23]

The second example was the pyruvate decarboxylase catalyzed formation of (ll )-l-hydroxy-l-phenyl-2-propanone (PAC) with benzaldehyde as substrate (Fig. 5 a) [64]. This second reaction shows one potential limitation of this method. Some compounds are too volatile for direct measurement by MALDl mass spectrometry or they do not ionize directly due to their nonpolar character. In this case, these compounds have to be derivatized prior to their measurement in order to reduce their volatihty and to introduce ionizable functions. This is, however, often very easy using well estabhshed quantitative reactions, e.g., formation of oximes from aldehydes and sugars (Fig. 5b). [Pg.15]

Direct measurements of the initial abundance of 53Mn in the early solar system have proven unreliable. CAIs, the first solids to form in the early solar system, are highly depleted in both manganese and chromium, both of which are moderately volatile. Operationally, the relative 53Mn-53Cr timescale has been anchored to an angrite, LEW 86010 (see above). Age differences have been calculated relative to LEW 86010 from... [Pg.289]

H. R. Linden High temperature pyrolysis of coal with high energy sources seems to follow readily predictable paths similar to hydrocarbon pyrolysis. The effects of pressure, gas atmosphere, reaction time, and the volatile matter" content of the coal bear the same relationship to yields of methane, ethane, ethylene, acetylene, and hydrogen as for simple hydrocarbons. Effective reaction temperature, although not directly measurable, could be estimated by means of a suitable chemical thermometer, such as the C-. H-. -C. H4-H. system which approaches equilibrium very rapidly. As Dr. Given also noted, equating the volatile matter" to the reactive portion of the coal is an oversimplification but adequate for empirical purposes the C H ratio of the coal would probably be more suitable. [Pg.726]

The solid phase fugacity meter is a more recent development which allows the direct measurement of partition coefficients for less volatile chemicals (Horstmann and McLachlan, 1992 Tolls and McLachlan, 1994). It involves a brief exposure of the vegetation to a... [Pg.136]

Volatilization of pesticides is an important pathway for their loss from treated agricultural lands. The importance of volatilization in the forest environment has not been established by direct measurement, but can be inferred from volatilization rates of the same pesticides under agricultural conditions and from other data on their behavior in the forest environment. In recent years, several studies of actual volatilization rates of pesticides under field conditions have provided an assessment of the rate of input to the air under typical conditions of use (1). [Pg.193]

No direct measurements of volatilization losses of any pesticide has been made following applications to forests. However, Grover et al. (7) recently measured the volatilization of 2,4-D after application as the isooctyl ester to a wheat field. This same low-volatile ester is used in forest vegetation control. The total vapor loss within 3 days after application of the isooctyl ester of 2,4-D was 20% of the amount applied. The applicability of these findings to volatilization of like pesticides in the forest environment will be discussed. We will indicate how volatilization in forests may differ from that reported from agricultural applications to open fields. The paper also will discuss the transfer of pesticides into the atmosphere from the standpoint of mechanisms involved, factors influencing rates of... [Pg.194]

Quite often, the solute in a solution is not volatile and, thus, its escaping tendency cannot be directly measured. However, in a binary solution, changes in the escaping tendency of the solute and solvent are related by the Gibbs-Duhem... [Pg.268]

The two methods described for determining vapor pressures appear to give reliable vapor pressure data for volatile pesticides and fumigants. The precision is better than 10 to 20% in most cases. Care must be taken, particularly with the determination of low vapor pressures which can be difficult. Estimation of vapor pressures by Clausius-Clapeyron and other related functions is dependable for interpolation and limited extrapolation. Extensive extrapolation is, as always, dangerous, and a direct measurement should be made as closely as possible to the desired temperature. The literature contains a number of examples which violate this principle. [Pg.61]

Some indirect method of measuring evaporative loss is needed because of the difficulty of direct measurements. Total amounts in random crop samples at various times after spraying can be measured by residue analytical methods (radioactive tracer or otherwise). The rate of loss so determined is subject to large statistical errors and includes losses by chemical and biochemical reaction and perhaps translocation in the crop as well. Exposure of typical test surfaces treated with some model substance, preferably less volatile than water but sufficiently volatile for simple gravimetric procedure, would seem the most suitable. We will see, however, how successful water is as a model for providing rough estimates. [Pg.129]

Major Disadvantages Of Residue Analysis. In the foregoing discussion several advantages and disadvantages of the various methods have been discussed, but the most severe limitation of the residue analysis methods has not been touched upon. That disadvantage is that none of these methods provide any direct information about either the quality or quantity of the material actually released. If volatile degradation products are produced, this information would not be detected nor would the ratio of components actually released be directly measurable. Since the material released is the active ingredient of any controlled release system, this lack of information is a serious drawback to dependence on residue analysis for release rate determinations. [Pg.147]

To test the method of predicting some directly measured ternary data, the predicted results for the system water-ethanol-l-propanol were used to calculate relative volatilities which were compared with the experimentally determined values of Carlson et al. (14). This comparison is shown on Figure 5. The comparison seems to indicate that the method of predicting is satisfactory and gives less scatter than the experimentally determined values of relative volatility. [Pg.113]

The ultimate test of the theoretical predictions for the mechanism of cyclopropane stereomutation would be to use an optically active disubstituted cyclopropane in which the substituents were just isotopes of hydrogen. This is a challenging problem both from a synthetic standpoint and from an analytical one. The analytical difficulty is particularly acute because one has to analyze a small, volatile molecule for both optical purity and cis-trans isomer ratio, and both measurements have to rely solely on the difference between isotopes. There are no functional groups to be used as handles for an optically active NMR shift reagent and so determination of optical purity must come from direct measurement of rotations—with a probable maximum specific rotation of < 1 ° ... [Pg.1037]

The fuel consumption rate is a direct measure of cooking power, provided all the gas is subsequently burned in the burner section. The heating value of most biomass with 5-10% moisture (Denver dry) is -18 kj/g, The stove typically produces 20-25% charcoal after the volatiles have been burned. The charcoal typically has a higher heating value of -24 kJ/g. In the tables the power level is calculated from these values. A gasification rate of 10 g/m gives 2.5 kW, coit )arabIe to the large burner on modem gas or electric stoves. [Pg.699]


See other pages where Volatilization direct measures is mentioned: [Pg.258]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.1082]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.1236]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.918]    [Pg.2029]    [Pg.2545]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.115 ]




SEARCH



Direct measure

Direct measurement

Directly measured

Volatility measurements

Volatilization measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info