Viscoelastic creep compliance

Laws and McLaughlin30 discuss viscoelastic creep compliances of composite materials using another approach to the problem of the elastic properties of heterogeneous materials - the self-consistent method. 

C is the so-called plane-strain viscoelastic creep compliance. It is connected to the relaxation modulus E(t) and Poisson s ratio v(t) by... 

Johnson [111] addressed the problem of viscoelastic flow by attempting to modify the JKR equation. In his approach, he postulated a creep compliance function... 

Tackifying resins enhance the adhesion of non-polar elastomers by improving wettability, increasing polarity and altering the viscoelastic properties. Dahlquist [31 ] established the first evidence of the modification of the viscoelastic properties of an elastomer by adding resins, and demonstrated that the performance of pressure-sensitive adhesives was related to the creep compliance. Later, Aubrey and Sherriff [32] demonstrated that a relationship between peel strength and viscoelasticity in natural rubber-low molecular resins blends existed. Class and Chu [33] used the dynamic mechanical measurements to demonstrate that compatible resins with an elastomer produced a decrease in the elastic modulus at room temperature and an increase in the tan <5 peak (which indicated the glass transition temperature of the resin-elastomer blend). Resins which are incompatible with an elastomer caused an increase in the elastic modulus at room temperature and showed two distinct maxima in the tan <5 curve. 

When dash pot and spring elements are connected in parallel they simulate the simplest mechanical representation of a viscoelastic solid. The element is referred to as a Voigt or Kelvin solid, and it is shown in Fig. 3.10(c). The strain as a function of time for an applied force for this element is shown in Fig. 3.11. After a force (or stress) elongates or compresses a Voigt solid, releasing the force causes a delay in the recovery due to the viscous drag represented by the dash pot. Due to this time-dependent response the Voigt model is often used to model recoverable creep in solid polymers. Creep is a constant stress phenomenon where the strain is monitored as a function of time. The function that is usually calculated is the creep compliance/(f) /(f) is the instantaneous time-dependent strain e(t) divided by the initial and constant stress o. ... 

Alvarez, M. D., Canet, W., Cuesta, R, Lamua, M. (1998). Viscoelastic characterization of solid foods from creep compliance data application to potato tissues. Z Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. A., 207, 356-362. 

The quasielastic method as developed by Schapery [26] is used in the development of the viscoelastic residual stress model. The use of the quasielastic method is motivated by the fact that the relaxation moduli are required in the viscoelastic analysis of residual stresses, whereas the experimental characterization of composite materials is usually in terms of the creep compliances. An excellent account of the development of the quasielastic method is given in [27]. The underlying restriction in the application of the quasielastic method is that the compliance response of the material shows little curvature when plotted versus log time [28]. Harper [27] shows excellent agreement between the quasielastic method and direct inversion for AS4/3510-6 graphite/epoxy composite. For most graphite/thermoset systems, the restrictions imposed by the quasielastic method are satisfied. 

Fibrin is a viscoelastic polymer, which means that it has both elastic and viscous properties (Ferry, 1988). Thus, the properties of fibrin may be characterized by stiffness or storage modulus (representing its elastic properties) and creep compliance or loss modulus/loss tangent (representing its inelastic properties). These parameters will determine how the clot responds to the forces applied to it in flowing blood. For example, a stiff clot will not deform as much as a less stiff one with applied stress. 

There is strong interest to analytically describe the fzme-dependence of polymer creep in order to extrapolate the deformation behaviour into otherwise inaccessible time-ranges. Several empirical and thermo-dynamical models have been proposed, such as the Andrade or Findley Potential equation [47,48] or the classical linear and non-linear visco-elastic theories ([36,37,49-51]). In the linear viscoelastic range Findley [48] and Schapery [49] successfully represent the (primary) creep compliance D(t) by a potential equation ... 

As an example of the concentration dependence of viscoelastic properties in Fig. 16.11 the shear creep compliance of poly(vinyl acetate) is plotted vs. time for solutions of poly(vinyl acetate) in diethyl phthalate with indicated volume fractions of polymer, reduced to 40 °C with the aid of the time temperature superposition principle (Oyanagi and Ferry, 1966). From this figure it becomes clear that the curves are parallel. We may conclude that the various may be shifted over the time axis to one curve, e.g. to the curve for pure polymer. In general it appears that viscoelastic properties measured at various concentrations may be reduced to one single curve at one concentration with the aid of a time-concentration superposition principle, which resembles the time-temperature superposition principle (see, e.g. Ferry, General references, 1980, Chap. 17). The Doolittle equation reads for this reduction ... 

Malamataris, S., and Rees, J. E. (1993), Viscoelastic properties of some pharmaceutical powders compared using creep compliance, extended Heckel analysis and tablet strength measurements, Int. I. Pharm., 92,123-135. 

For viscoelastic fluids, the formalism of a viscous fluid and an elastic solid are mixed [31]. The equations for the effective viscosity, dynamic viscosity, and the creep compliance are given in Table 12.4 for a viscous fluid, an elastic solid, and a visco-elastic solid and fluid. For the viscoelastic fluid model the dynamic viscosity, >j (tu), and the elastic contribution, G (ti)), are plotted as a function of (w) in Figure 12.31. With one relaxation time, X, the breaks in the two curves occur at co. 

Consider two experiments carried out with identical samples of a viscoelastic material. In experiment (a) the sample is subjected to a stress CT for a time t. The resulting strain at f is ei, and the creep compliance measured at that time is D t) = e la. ln experiment (b) a sample is stressed to a level CT2 such that strain i is achieved immediately. The stress is then gradually decreased so that the strain remains at f for time t (i.e., the sample does not creep further). The stress on the material at time t will be a-i, and the corresponding relaxation modulus will be y 2(t) = CT3/C1. In measurements of this type, it can be expected that az> 0 > ct and Y t) (D(r)) , as indicated in Eq. (11-14). G(t) and Y t) are obtained directly only from stress relaxation measurements, while D(t) and J(t) require creep experiments for their direct observation. Tliese various parameters can be related in the linear viscoelastic region described in Section 11.5.2. 

Creep-compliance studies conducted in the linear viscoelastic range also provide valuable information on the viscoelastic behavior of foods (Sherman, 1970 Rao, 1992). The existence of linear viscoelastic range may also be determined from torque-sweep dynamic rheological experiments. The creep-compliance curves obtained at all values of applied stresses in linear viscoelastic range should superimpose on each other. In a creep experiment, an undeformed sample is suddenly subjected to a constant shearing stress, Oc. As shown in Figure 3 1, the strain (y) will increase with time and approach a steady state where the strain rate is constant. The data are analyzed in terms of creep-compliance, defined by the relation ... 

Sherman (1966) studied the viscoelastic properties of ice cream mix and melted ice cream. The creep-compliance curve for the ice cream mix was described by the relation ... 

Time constants are related to the relaxation times and can be found in equations based on mechanical models (phenomenological approaches), in constitutive equations (empirical or semiempirical) for viscoelastic fluids that are based on either molecular theories or continuum mechanics. Equations based on mechanical models are covered in later sections, particularly in the treatment of creep-compliance studies while the Bird-Leider relationship is an example of an empirical relationship for viscoelastic fluids. 

Rheological properties of mayonnaise have been studied using different rheological techniques steady shear rate-shear stress, time dependent shear rate-shear stress, stress growth and decay at a constant shear rate, dynamic viscoelastic behavior, and creep-compliance viscoelastic behavior. More studies have been devoted to the study of rheological properties of mayonnaise than of salad dressings, probably because the former is a more stable emulsion and exhibits complex viscous and viscoelastic rheological behavior. 

We note that the creep-compliance parameters can be used to calculate the moduli Ei = 1/J, and viscosities t]i = EiXi. In the following, the magnitudes of the viscoelastic parameters, that is, the moduli and the viscosities, will be discussed. 

Rheological properties of salad dressings also were studied using the techniques steady shear rate-shear stress, stress growth and decay at a constant shear rate, dynamic viscoelastic behavior, and creep-compliance viscoelastic behavior. 

The beauty of the linear viscoelastic analysis lies in the fact that once a viscoelastic function is known, the rest of the functions can be determined. For example, if one measures the comphance function J t), the values of the components of the complex compliance function can in principle be determined from J(t) by using Fourier transforms [Eqs. (6.30)]. On the other hand, the components of the complex relaxation moduh can be obtained from those of / (co) by using Eq. (6.50). Even more, the real components of both the complex relaxation modulus and the complex compliance function can be determined from the respective imaginary components, and vice versa, by using the Kronig-Kramers relations. Moreover, the inverse of the Fourier transform of G (m) and/or G"(co) [/ (co) and/or /"(co)] allows the determination of the shear relaxation modulus (shear creep compliance). Finally, the convolution integrals of Eq. (5.57) allow the determination of J t) and G t) by an efficient method of numerical calculation outlined by Hopkins and Hamming (13). 

There are a great number of techniques for the experimental determination of viscoelastic functions. The techniques most frequently found in the literature are devoted to measuring the relaxation modulus, the creep compliance function, and the components of the complex modulus in either shear, elongational, or flexural mode (1-4). Although the relaxation modulus and creep compliance functions are defined in the time domain, whereas the complex viscoelastic functions are given in the frequency domain, it is possible, in principle, by using Fourier transform, to pass from the time domain to the frequency domain, or vice versa, as discussed earlier. 

As mentioned above, it is very difficult, for experimental reasons, to measure the relaxation modulus or the creep compliance at times below 1 s. In this time scale region, dynamic mechanical viscoelastic functions are widely employed (5,6). However, in these methods the measured forces and displacements are not simply related to the stress and strain in the samples. Moreover, in the case of dynamic experiments, inertial effects are frequently important, and this fact must be taken into account in the theoretical methods developed to calculate complex viscoelastic functions from experimental results. 

Strictly speaking, there are no static viscoelastic properties as viscoelastic properties are always time-dependent. However, creep and stress relaxation experiments can be considered quasi-static experiments from which the creep compliance and the modulus can be obtained (4). Such tests are commonly applied in uniaxial conditions for simphcity. The usual time range of quasi-static transient measurements is limited to times not less than 10 s. The reasons for this is that in actual experiments it takes a short period of time to apply the force or the deformation to the sample, and a transitory dynamic response overlaps the idealized creep or relaxation experiment. There is no limitation on the maximum time, but usually it is restricted to a maximum of 10" s. In fact, this range of times is complementary, in the corresponding frequency scale, to that of dynamic experiments. Accordingly, to compare these two complementary techniques, procedures of interconversion of data (time frequency or its inverse) are needed. Some of these procedures are discussed in Chapters 6 and 9. 

Accordingly, the loss compliance function presents a maximum in the frequency domain at lower frequency than the loss relaxation modulus. This behavior is illustrated in Figure 8.18, where the complex relaxation modulus, the complex creep compliance function, and the loss tan 8 for a viscoelastic system with a single relaxation time are plotted. Similar arguments applied to a minimum in tan 8 lead to the inequalities... 

In the transient compliance function, J(t), the retardation spectrum L(x) is modulated by the function 1 — exp(—t/x) [see Eq. (9.15)]. Plotting this function against In t/x gives the sigmoidal curve shown in Figure 9.6. We should note that the time of observation ( ) in the first quadrant is greater than the retardation times, and as a result x varies between zero and t. Then the creep compliance function for viscoelastic liquids is approximately given by (1,2)... 

Once a relaxation (retardation) spectrum is obtained from a relaxation (creep compliance) viscoelastic function, any other function can be obtained. Alternatively, approximate methods have been developed to calculate viscoelastic functions from one another (10). By taking into account... 

Give an approximate expression for the retardation spectrum of a viscoelastic solid whose creep compliance is given by... 

---