Vahdation sets

Aqueous solubility is selected to demonstrate the E-state application in QSPR studies. Huuskonen et al. modeled the aqueous solubihty of 734 diverse organic compounds with multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) approaches [27]. The set of structural descriptors comprised 31 E-state atomic indices, and three indicator variables for pyridine, ahphatic hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons, respectively. The dataset of734 chemicals was divided into a training set ( =675), a vahdation set (n=38) and a test set (n=21). A comparison of the MLR results (training, r =0.94, s=0.58 vahdation r =0.84, s=0.67 test, r =0.80, s=0.87) and the ANN results (training, r =0.96, s=0.51 vahdation r =0.85, s=0.62 tesL r =0.84, s=0.75) indicates a smah improvement for the neural network model with five hidden neurons. These QSPR models may be used for a fast and rehable computahon of the aqueous solubihty for diverse orgarhc compounds. 

In order to be able to perform validation of the model, not all 30 cases can be used to determine the model. Also care must be taken to which cases will be used for validation and which cases for determination of the model. Because it is easy with an experimental model to fit noise in the data, a Targe vahdation set has been chosen (5 cases in the validation set and 25 cases remaining in the set to determine the model (=training set)). To avoid coincidental results, the whole procedure is repeated 5 times with different training sets and vahdation sets, where the cases in the validation set have been selected randomly. 

Fig. 5 Typical course of the errors of the training and the validation set during the iterative optimization of the neural network parameters. While the error of the training set is minimized by adapting the weight parameters and decreases steadily, the error of the vahdation set not used in the fitting shows a minimum. This minimum corresponds to the set of weight parameters with the best overall generalization properties of the neural network.

As quoted previously, densities of ternary mixtures of ethanol + water + ionic liquid were obtained using ANNs. The model that achieves better predictions consists in five input neurons, one middle layer with four neurons and one output neuron. This model presents RMSEs of 0.024g cm" (R =0.982) for the training set and 0.008g-cm (R = 0.977) for the vahdation set. The average percentage deviation for training and validation phase is 1.96%. 

Bias represents the average ditference between predicted and reference y-values for the I, samples in the vahdation set ... 

The setpoint was identical to the setpoint for the experimental batch runs and the controller was tuned manually. Figure 30.21 shows the results for a simulated batch run with initial conditions taken from one of the three batch runs. The results for the two vahdation sets were similar. 

Strictly, the mean observed values, (y), which appear in Equation (12.39) should corresponc to the mean of the values for each cross-vahdation group as appropriate rather than the overall mean value of the dependent variables, though often the mean of the entire date set will be used instead. 

The second aspect of quahty documentation is to detail how the work processes referred to in the manual are performed. The QA unit is often the organization responsible for issuing a set of procedures designed to assure conformance to the appropriate standards or to company poHcy. The procedures, often called standard operation procedures (SOP) or quahty operating procedures (QOP), should include such topics as customer complaints, audit protocols, stabihty testing, preparation of COAs, test method vahdation, etc. 

A spreadsheet program is intuitive in its operation and can immediately show the effect of any one change throughout the whole spreadsheet. It is thus a subtie form of data vaHdation an error may be spotted immediately. Furthermore, when a material balance is set up, the total effect caused by a change in one variable may be seen at once. 

A real-time optimization (RTO) system determines set point changes and implements them via the computer control system without intervention from unit operators. The RTO system completes all data transfer, optimization c culations, and set point implementation before unit conditions change and invahdate the computed optimum. In addition, the RTO system should perform all tasks without upsetting plant operations. Several steps are necessaiy for implementation of RTO, including determination of the plant steady state, data gathering and vahdation, updating of model parameters (if necessaiy) to match current operations, calculation of the new (optimized) set points, and the implementation of these set points. 

Vahdation is the procedure of comparing measurements to known relations between the measurements and equipment settings (May,... 

If the comparison shows that the measurement is inconsistent with the comparison information, the measurement is considered suspecl. If a measurement can be compared to more than one set of information and found to be inconsistent with all, it is likely that the measurement is in error. The measurement should then be excluded from the measurement set. In this section, validation is extended to include comparison of the measurements to the constraints and initial adjustment in the measurements. Validation functions as an initial screening procedure before the more comphcated procedures begin. Oftentimes, vahdation is the only measurement treatment required prior to interpretation. 

Recommendations Once measurements are made, vahdation is the most important step for establishing a sound set of measurements. The comparisons against other measurements or other known pieces of information qmckly identify suspecl measurements. Spreadsheet analysis of constraints, particularly material and energy balances, identifies other weaknesses in the measurements and provides the opportunity for discussions with those responsible before considerable analysis effort is expended. Finally, initial adjustments provide the beginnings of the interpretation analysis. 

Taylor PDF, De Bievre P, Walder AJ, Entwistle A (1995) Vahdation of the analytical linearity and mass discrimination correction model exhibited by a Multiple Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer by means of a set of synthetic uranium isotope mixtures. J Anal At Spectrom 10 395-398... 

When the GA algorithm is terminated, one is presented with one or more variable subsets, along with the cross-validation error associated with each subset. At this point, there are several ways in which these results could be used to select the final subset of variables. One could select the union or the intersection of the variables that appear in all of these subsets, or simply the subset that generated the lowest cross-vahdation error. One could also use prior knowledge regarding the stability or rehabihty of certain variables to make the final selection. However, it should be noted that the GA algorithm starts with a randomly-selected set of variable subsets, and thus will generate different results with the identical x and y data when run more than once. As a result, it is often useful to run the GA several times on the same data, in order to obtain a consensus on the selection of useful variables. 

Moreover, a final 3D-QSAR model vahdation was done using a prospective study with an external test set. The 82 compounds from the data set were used in a lead optimization project. A CoMFA model gave an (cross validated) value of 0.698 for four relevant PLS components and a conventional of 0.938 were obtained for those 82 compounds. The steric descriptors contributed 54% to the total variance, whereas the electrostatic field explained 46%. The CoMSIA model led to an (cross vahdated) value of 0.660 for five PLS components and a conventional of 0.933. The contributions for steric, electrostatic, and hydrophobic fields were 25, 44, and 31%. As a result, it was proved that the basic S4-directed substituents should be replaced against more hydrophobic building blocks to improve pharmacokinetic properties. The structural and chemical interpretation of CoMFA and CoMSIA contour maps directly pointed to those regions in the Factor Xa binding site, where steric, electronic, or hydrophobic effects play a dominant role in ligand-receptor interactions. 

Acceptance Criteria for Validation Parameter. It is highly recommended to set acceptance criteria prior to starting validation experiments. This will provide guidance to die validating scientist on the range of acceptability of the vahdation results. 

The first set of experiments we discuss for this system involved partially evaporating small (3 mm typical dimension) CMAS liquid drops held at 1,800°C in a vacuum furnace for times ranging from 15 min to 90 min (for details, see Richter et al., 2002). One purpose of these experiments was to vahdate a thermodynamic model for calculating saturation vapor pressures. Figure 6 shows how the Si02 and MgO contents of the hquid evolve as evaporation proceeds. The composition of the evaporation residues is compared to composition trajectories calculated using the thermodynamic model described by Grossman et al. (2000). The trajectories are... 

Complex instruments giving advice as the output may never be validated to the extent of a simple analytical method. However, what vahdation will do is to set the bounds of the responses and situations in which the instrument will give fit-for-purpose output. The users of the instrument will then need to estabhsh if their particular uses fall within the scope of the validated instrument. We look forward to a report of a fully validated electronic nose. 

Figure 6.8 Depiction of the recursive process used in our laboratory to develop QSAR models for predicting estrogen receptor binding. The process starts with data from an initial set of chemicals from the literature QSAR modeling. These preliminary QSAR models are used prospectively to define a set of chemicals that will further improve the model s robustness and predictive capability. The new chemicals are assayed, and these data are then used to challenge and refine the QSAR models. Vahdation of the model is critical. The process emphasizes the living model concept.

Cross-validation is used to estimate the generalization error of a model or to compare the performance of different models. K-fold cross-validation divides a data set into k different subsets of equal size n. The validation procedure includes k runs and applies a round-robin approach. During each run one of the k subsets is left out and used as the test set while the remaining subsets are used for training the model. Leave-one-out cross-validation is present if k equals the sample size (i.e., each subset includes only one case). The selection between leave-one-out cross-validation and k-fold cross-vahdation depends on the situation. The former is preferred for continuous error functions, whereas the latter is preferred for determining the number of misclassified cases. A frequent value for k-fold cross-validation is k = 10. 

StereoPlex connects UNITY and CombiLibMaker often using CONCORD to rapidly generate high quahty 3D coordinate sets for the compounds entered into the databases or combinatorial hbraries. With StereoPlex new combinatorial hbraries containing chiral structures can be vahdated, enhanced and expanded by using a combination of StereoPlex and CONCORD. 

---