Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ultrafiltration systems, functions

Polymer-assisted ultrafiltration. The functionalized dendrimer described above was used to remove boron from an aqueous feed stream. With the polymer in the holding cell (see Figure 3), the feed was added at the same rate that the permeate left the system. The differential equation describing the change in total boron concentration in the holding cell as a function of permeate volume is simply d(Bt)... [Pg.204]

Perhaps the most viable short-term use for dendritic macromolecules lies in their use as novel catalytic systems since it offers the possibility to combine the activity of small molecule catalysts with the isolation benefits of crosslinked polymeric systems. These potential advantages are intimately connected with the ability to control the number and nature of the surface functional groups. Unlike linear or crosslinked polymers where catalytic sites may be buried within the random coil structure, all the catalytic sites can be precisely located at the chain ends, or periphery, of the dendrimer. This maximizes the activity of each individual catalytic site and leads to activities approaching small molecule systems. However the well defined and monodisperse size of dendrimers permits their easy separation by ultrafiltration and leads to the recovery of catalyst-free products. The first examples of such dendrimer catalysts have recently been reported... [Pg.152]

It is a key step to develop methods to separate peptides with different molecular weights. An ultrafiltration membrane system equipped with the appropriate molecular weight cutoff has been effectively used in separating peptides having desired molecular weights (Jeon et al., 2000). In order to obtain functionally active peptides, it is a common method to use the type of enzymes letting sequential enzymatic digestions. [Pg.239]

Whey protein concentrates (WPC), which are relatively new forms of milk protein products available for emulsification uses, have also been studied (4,28,29). WPC products prepared by gel filtration, ultrafiltration, metaphosphate precipitation and carboxymethyl cellulose precipitation all exhibited inferior emulsification properties compared to caseinate, both in model systems and in a simulated whipped topping formulation (2. However, additional work is proceeding on this topic and it is expected that WPC will be found to be capable of providing reasonable functionality in the emulsification area, especially if proper processing conditions are followed to minimize protein denaturation during their production. Such adverse effects on the functionality of WPC are undoubtedly due to their Irreversible interaction during heating processes which impair their ability to dissociate and unfold at the emulsion interface in order to function as an emulsifier (22). [Pg.212]

Most ultrafiltration membranes are porous, asymmetric, polymeric structures produced by phase inversion, i.e., the gelation or precipitation of a species from a soluble phase. See also Membrane Separations Technology. Membrane structure is a function of the materials used (polymer composition, molecular weight distribution, solvent system, etc) and the mode of preparation (solution viscosity, evaporation time, humidity, etc.). Commonly used polymers include cellulose acetates, polyamides, polysulfoncs, dyncls (vinyl chlondc-acrylonitrile copolymers) and puly(vinylidene fluoride). [Pg.1635]

In natural systems therefore part of the complexation capacity might be caused by colloidal material. This was demonstrated in experiments on the complexation capacity of samples from the Scheldt estuary at different salinities, determined as function of several concentration steps, using a hollow fiber ultrafiltration set up with a theoretical cut off of MW 5000 (Kramer and Duinker, 1984a). [Pg.13]

Two main criteria for the membrane selection are pore size and material. As peroxidases usually have sizes in the range of 10-80 kDa, ultrafiltration membranes with a molecular cutoff between 1 and 50 kDa are the most adequate to prevent enzyme leakage [99]. The materials commonly applied to ultrafiltration membranes are synthetic polymers (nylon, polypropylene, polyamide, polysulfone, cellulose and ceramic materials [101]. The adequate material depends on a great number of variables. When enzyme is immobilized into the matrix, this must be prepared at mild conditions to preserve the enzymatic activity. In the case of enzyme immobilization onto the membrane, this should be activated with the reactive groups necessary to interact with the functional groups of the enzyme. If an extractive system is considered, the selection of the hydrophilicity or hydro-phobicity of the membrane should be performed according to the features of reactants, products, and solvents. In any case, the membrane should not interfere with the catalytic integrity of the enzyme. [Pg.260]

The choroid plexus are bags composed of epithelial cells that project into the ventricles and contain a capillary plexus (lohanson, 1988). The capillaries do not have barrier function and so produce an ultrafiltrate, w hich fills the bag. The epithelial cells have tight junctions and so prevent the ultrafiltrate fi om entering the ventricular space. Unlike the capillaries, the epithelial cells of the choroid plexus have a high rate of vesicular turnover, w hich is responsible for the production of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). How ever, the CSF is not an ultra-filfi ate, but a secreted substance. The choroid plexus also has many selective transport systems, some of w hich are specific to it or are enriched in comparison to the vascular BBB. [Pg.26]

Ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF) membranes can be made on less sophisticated supports. The simplest MF tubular membrane consists of an extruded porous tube (layer 1) as a support coated on the inside or outside with a macroporous layer (layer 2) which serves as the functional filtration layer. The support system shown in Fig. 6.3 is in fact a sophisticated UF or Knudsen gas separation membrane. For less demanding applications a 2-layer support could also be used. [Pg.145]


See other pages where Ultrafiltration systems, functions is mentioned: [Pg.375]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.857]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.1239]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.933]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.4041]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.838]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.244]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.933 , Pg.936 ]




SEARCH



Functional systems

Ultrafiltrate

Ultrafiltration systems

© 2024 chempedia.info