True Component Approach models

The basic assumptions implied in the homogeneous model, which is most frequently applied to single-component two-phase flow at high velocities (with annular and mist flow-patterns) are that (a) the velocities of the two phases are equal (b) if vaporization or condensation occurs, physical equilibrium is approached at all points and (c) a single-phase friction factor can be applied to the mixture if the Reynolds number is properly defined. The first assumption is true only if the bulk of the liquid is present as a dispersed spray. The second assumption (which is also implied in the Lockhart-Martinelli and Chenoweth-Martin models) seems to be reasonably justified from the very limited evidence available. 

It is interesting to compare the assumptions made by Bankoff to the restrictions operating in the investigation by Nicklin, Wilkes, and Davidson for slug flow. In their work the velocity component of the slugs due to liquid flow approached the maximum liquid velocity at the tube center-line. If this is also true of the bubbles of Bankoff s model and the bubble rise velocity due to buoyancy is ignored, then the velocity of the bubbles as given by Nicklin et al. would be,... 

When we are solving for an unknown spectrum, each data point contains some information about the component spectral lines. A data point far from the center of a given line would be expected to contain very little information about that line. A hypothetical model of the spectrum could incorporate widely varying estimates of the amplitude of that line without influencing the fit to the data point in question. Three data points moderately distributed near the line center—say, spanning the interval between the half-maximum points—affix the parameters of the line more reliably. Instead of taking equally spaced samples of a trial solution as independent unknowns (the deconvolution approach), we can express the sought-after true spectrum in terms of its spectral-line parameters—amplitudes, half-widths, positions, and so on—provided that we can assume such a model with some confidence. 

By comparing the actual composition of sea water (sediments + sea -f- air) with a model in which the pertinent components (minerals, volatiles) with which water has come into contact are allowed to reach true equilibrium, Sillen in 1959 epitomized the application of equilibrium models for portraying the prominent features of the chemical composition of this system. His analysis, for example, has indicated that contrary to the traditional view, the pH of the ocean is not buffered primarily by the carbonate system his results suggest that heterogeneous-equilibria of silicate minerals comprise the principal pH buffer systems in oceanic waters. This approach and its expansion have provided a more quantitative basis for Forchbammer s suggestion of 100 years ago that the quantity of the different elements in sea water is not proportional to the quantity of elements which river water pours into the sea but is inversely proportional to the facility with which the elements in sea water are made insoluble by general chemical actions in the sea. 

EPA recommends three approaches (1) if the toxicity data on mixture of concern are available, the quantitative risk assessment is done directly form these preferred data (2) when toxicity data are not available for the mixture of concern, data of a sufficiently similar mixture can be used to derive quantitative risk assessment for mixture of concern and (3) if the data are not available for both mixture of concern and the similar mixture, mixture effects can be evaluated from the toxicity data of components. According to EPA, the dose-additive models reasonably predict the systemic toxicity of mixtures composed of similar (dose addition) and dissimilar (response addition) compounds. Therefore, the potential health risk of a mixture can be estimated using a hazard index (HI) derived by summation of the ratios of the actual human exposure level to estimated maximum acceptable level of each toxicant. A HI near to unity is suggestive of concern for public health. This approach will hold true for the mixtures that do not deviate from additivity and do not consider the mode of action of chemicals. Modifications of the standard HI approach are being developed to take account of the data on interactions. 

This is true of the component-by-com-ponent ( bottom-up ) method for evaluating uncertainty that is directly in line with GUM. Also this is true for the top-down approach [20] that provides a valuable alternative when poorly understood steps are involved in the CMP and a full mathematical model is lacking. An important point is that the top-down methodology implies a reconciliation of information available with the required one that is based on a detailed analysis of the factors which affect the result. For both approaches to work advantageously a clear specification of the analytical procedure is evidently a necessary condition. 

Mixed-effects models, which will be described in later chapters, do not suffer from this flaw and tend to produce both unbiased mean and variance estimates. As an example, Sheiner and Beal (1980) used Monte Carlo simulation to study the accuracy of the two-stage approach and mixed effects model approach in fitting an Emax model with parameters Vmax, Km - Data from 49 individuals were simulated. The relative deviation from the mean estimated value to the true simulated value for Vmax and Km was 3.7% and —4.9%, respectively, for the two-stage method and —0.9 and 8.3%, respectively, for the mixed effects model approach. Hence, both methods were relatively unbiased in their estimation of the population means. However, the relative deviation from the mean estimated variance to the true simulated variance for Vmax and Km was 70 and 82%, respectively, for the two-stage method and —2.6 and 4.1%, respectively, for the mixed effects model approach. Hence, the variance components were significantly overestimated with the two-stage approach. Further, the precision of the estimates across simulations tended to be more variable with the two-stage approach than with the mixed effects... 

In general this model is quite effective as it solves the feature explosion problem by positing a modular approach. One significant weakness however is that the elasticity hypothesis is demonstrably false. If it was true then we would expect the z-scores for all the phones in a syllable to be the same, but this is hardly ever the case depending on context, position and other features the z-scores for phones across a syllable vary widely. This is a problem with only the second component in the model and a more sophisticated model of syllable/phone duration interaction could solve this. In fact, there is no reason why a second neural network could not be used for this problem. 

It wiU be more practical to use the pre-developed internal PRA model to huild a fire PRA model in the nuclear power plants (NPPs). Also, as mentioned in the Ref. (Anoha 2005), it is desirable to automatically insert external event logic structures into an internal PRA model instead of manual insertion of external impacts. When a fire PRA model is developed by the declarative approach (Anoha 2005), contrary to internal events PRA, in the case of fire PRA, many basic events related to components are removed by setting the imavaHable components events to true or 1 due to a fire occurrence during a quantification process. They do not appear in the minimal cut sets (MCSs) after quantification. 

---