Transport effects calculation

To calculate the electron-transport effect through GDL and flow plate, the charge conservation equation for the electronic phase must be solved additionally, namely... 

If intraparticle diffusion effects are important and an effectiveness factor ij is employed (as in equation 3.8) to correct the chemical kinetics observed in the absence of transport effects, then it is necessary to adopt a stepwise procedure for solution. First the pellet equations (such as 3.10) are solved in order to calculate t) for the entrance to the reactor and then the reactor equation (3.87) may be solved in finite difference form, thus providing a new value of Y at the next increment along the reactor. The whole procedure may then be repeated at successive increments along the reactor. 

Of course, for reactive flow calculations a new model would have to be constructed based on these techniques which used instead the equations governing compressible fluids and which contained the added chemical reactions and diffusive transport effects. 

In a nanowire system, the quantized subband energy enm and the transport effective mass mzz along the wire axis are the two most important parameters and determine almost all the electronic properties. Due to the anisotropic carriers and the special geometric configuration (circular wire cross section and high aspect ratio of length to diameter), several approximations were used in earlier calculations to derive e m and mzz in bismuth nanowires. In the... 

Typically, a criterion is derived on the premise that the net transport effect should not alter the true chemical rate by more than some arbitrarily specified amount, normally 5%. Because of the uncertainty involved in knowing some of the necessary parameters, and since they are based on approximate rather than exact solutions, the philosophy of using the criteria should be conservative. As a general rule, a clear decision on whether a reaction takes place under kinetic or diffusion control is possible only when the calculated value of a criterion is significantly above or below the respective limiting value (i.e. an order of magnitude), otherwise a more detailed analysis is recommended. 

The intraparticle transport effects, both isothermal and nonisothermal, have been analyzed for a multitude of kinetic rate equations and particle geometries. It has been shown that the concentration gradients within the porous particle are usually much more serious than the temperature gradients. Hudgins [17] points out that intraparticle heat effects may not always be negligible in hydrogen-rich reaction systems. The classical experimental test to check for internal resistances in a porous particle is to measure the dependence of the reaction rate on the particle size. Intraparticle effects are absent if no dependence exists. In most cases a porous particle can be considered isothermal, but the absence of internal concentration gradients has to be proven experimentally or by calculation (Chapter 6). 

This inaccuracy stems from their calculation of molecular transport effects, such as viscous dissipation and thermal conduction, from bulk flow quantities, such as mean flow velocity and temperature. This approximation of microscale phenomena with macroscale information fails as the characteristic length of the (gaseous) flow gradients approaches the average distance travelled by molecules between collisions - the mean path. The ratio of these quantities is referred to as Knudsen number. 

A mathematical model to be solved numerically has been developed and used to predict the separation effects caused by nonstationary conditions for a liquid membrane transport. Numerical calculations were made to compute pertraction characteristics such as input and output membrane selectivity (ratio of respective fluxes), concentration profiles for cations bound by a carrier in a liquid membrane phase, and the overall separation factors. These quantities are discussed as dependent... 

Some authors (7, ) have used measured parameters of solute and solvent transport for calculation of membrane pore size distributions. Difficulties associated with this approach are of both experimental and theoretical nature. The experiments need to be carried out under conditions that minimize or eliminate effects of boundary phenomena (polarization) and of solute adsorption (fouling) on the measured coefficients. This is rarely done. An even more serious obstacle in this approach is the absence of quantitative and valid relations between measured transport parameters and the size parameters of a "representative pore."... 

From the experimental side, the band-structure parameters are mainly determined from the cyclotron resonance (CR) spectra of electron and holes (see for instance [4]). Some of these parameters can also be obtained from the Zeeman splitting of electronic transitions of shallow impurities involving levels for which the electronic masses can be taken as those of free electrons or holes, or from the magnetoreflectivity of free carriers. Average effective masses can also be deduced from the Hall-effect measurements or from other transport measurements. Calculation methods that have been used to obtain band-structure parameters free from experimental input are the ab-initio pseudopotential method, the k-p method and a combination of both. These theoretical methods are presented in Chap. 2 of [107]. VB parameters at k = 0 including k and q have been calculated for several semiconductors with diamond and zinc-blended structures by Lawaetz [55]. 

Thus, the true charge-transfer current can be calculated from the ordinate at the origin in the plot between the reciprocal of the measured current density, j"1, as a function of w. The slope (B 1) is the reciprocal value of the Levich constant, 0.620nFCJoj, because it is the only portion that strictly depends on the co value [107], where D, is the coefficient of diffusion of they-particle. With the currents corrected from the mass transport effects, we can depict the Tafel lines, from which the values of j0 and a can be calculated. 

The enormously time-consuming nature of full model calculations prevents this approach from being used for complete fits of experimental data. As a rule, it is employed to verify simpler models and/or to confirm the reasonability of rate constants by comparison with experimental data. To enable more convenient and routine analysis of measured sensorgrams, simpler models of mass transport effects have been derived. 

Green and Belfort39 have combined the equations for particle migration due to the tubular pinch effect with the normal back-diffusive transport to calculate... 

Figure 9.21 The effect of agent concentration on the uranium flux through a coupled transport membrane calculated from Equations 13 and 24. The measured flux data are shown for comparison.17 (Membrane Celgard 2400/Alamine 336 dissolved in Aromatic 150. Feed 0.2% Uranium, pH 1.0. Product pH 4.5).

For example, consider the smallest particles of silica-alumina beads (14-mesh Tyler, r = 0.058 cm.) used in the styrene experiments at 800° F (426°). The initial rate dn /dt calculated as outlined above was 7 X 10 mole/cc. sec. The diffusivity of cumene in the pore structure of catalysts of this type having the same surface area was found by the porous plug method (5) to be 7 X 10 cm. /sec. The left side of Equation (22) yields the value 2. Thus the criterion for absence of significant diffusion transport is violated. Using the curves of Weisz and Prater (5) and the fact that (dur/dt) X (l/c)rVD ff = the value of 2 obtained above means that the observed rate in the front part of the catalyst bed was only 85 % of the rate in absence of diffusion transport effects. Since the addition of inhibitor reduces the rate and therefore reduces the diffusion transport effect, the value of Kp will be too small when it is determined under conditions in which either dn/dt for pure cumene or both dn/dt for pure cumene and inhibited cumene are affected by diffusion transport. 

Baddour [26] retained the above model equations after checking for the influence of heat and mass transfer effects. The maximum temperature difference between gas and catalyst was computed to be 2.3°C at the top of the reactor, where the rate is a maximum. The difference at the outlet is 0.4°C. This confirms previous calculations by Kjaer [120]. The inclusion of axial dispersion, which will be discussed in a later section, altered the steady-state temperature profile by less than O.S°C. Internal transport effects would only have to be accounted for with particles having a diameter larger than 6 mm, which are used in some high-capacity modern converters to keep the pressure drop low. Dyson and Simon [121] have published expressions for the effectiveness factor as a function of the pressure, temperature and conversion, using Nielsen s experimental data for the true rate of reaction [119]. At 300 atm and 480°C the effectiveness factor would be 0.44 at a conversion of 10 percent and 0.80 at a conversion of 50 percent. 

In order to perform a simple competition study it is necessary to first determine the minimal concentration of competitor needed to saturate its own transport. To calculate intracellular concentrations of microinjected macromolecules we have taken the accessible volume of the nucleus to be 40 nl and the cytosol to be 500 nl (Gurdon and Wickens, 1983). In practice, saturation concentrations are operationally defined as the minimal unlabeled substrate concentration necessary to reduce significantly the rate of labeled tracer substrate transport. If too high a concentration of unlabeled competitor is used, then nonspecific inhibitory effects on tracer substrate transport can be expected. 

Results with the previous calculation scheme were giving C/E values of about +5 to 20%. The fact that the comparison is significantly improved indicates that both the method and the nuclear data have been improved and that there remain probably no compensating effects. The results obtained with the ERANOS calculation scheme are therefore satisfactory and this scheme can be considered to be reliable as an explicit treatment of all shadowing and transport effects is taken into account. This good behaviour is also observed for the prediction of control rod reactivity worth in the Phenix reactor. There is only a ring of 6 control rods in this reactor. The results are gathered in Table 5. 

The unusual variation of a above 400 C (Fig. 5) supports the validity of the proposed model. Agreement of e q>erimental results with calculated values [10] for the case of the usual intrinsic conduction is obtained only on the assumption that the electron mobility in CrSi2 is lower by a factor of a hundred than the hole mobility. This assumption means, in practice, that the electrons do not contribute to the transport effects, i.e., it supports the model we have proposed. 

Despite the potential of the BEM to reduce the dimensionahty of the numerical solution and provide a direct measure of the interfadal flux, it has been poorly exploited by workers in the electrochemical field in comparison with the FDM and the FEM. By comparison, heat and mass transfer have been widely treated using the BEM in the engineering literature [148-151]. In 1984, the BEM was employed to calculate the primary current distribution during an electropolymerization reaction [152], the potential of the BEM for apphcations to irregular geometries was also noted. Hume and coworkers [153] used the approach to analyze mass transport effects of electrode-position through polymeric masks. 

A third LCA that calculated the environmental profiles of clamshells was created for PLA, PET, and PS plastic materials. The LCA was calculated for use as containers for strawberries. The functional unit was 1000 containers that have packaging capacity to hold 0.4536 kg of strawberries. The LCA included transportation effects and provided environmental impact results for global wanning, energy consumption, aquatic acidification, ozone layer depletion, aquatic eutrophication, respiratory organics, respiratory inorganics, land occupations, and aquatic eco-toxicity. SimaPro LCA software was used to calculate the environmental impacts of the plastic materials. The mass of the PET was calculated based on the same volume as the PLA clamshell and the density ratio of PET and PLA (Madival et al. 2009). 

---