Toxicity assessment, definition

It is important to note that a toxicity assessment based on lethality due to toxic gases is only part of the total fire hazard that needs to be evaluated especially when one is making choices as to the best material for a specific end use. ASTM defines fire hazard as the potential for harm associated with fire. The discussion that follows this definition states, a fire may pose one or more types of hazard to people, animals or property. These hazards are associated with the environment and with a number of fire-test-response characteristics of materials, products or assemblies including but not limited to ease of ignition. 

The proposed US EPA weight-of-evidence (WOE) scheme for suspect developmental toxicants defines three levels of confidence for data used to identify developmental hazards and to assess the risk of human developmental toxicity (1) definitive evidence for human developmental toxicity or for no apparent human developmental toxicity, (2) adequate evidence for potential human developmental toxicity or no apparent potential human developmental toxicity, and (3) inadequate evidence for determining potential human developmental toxicity. The scheme may require scientific judgment based on experience to weigh the implications of study design, statistical analyses, and biological significance of the data. 

Soon after the Bhopal accident, the government of India promised to conduct a comprehensive study on the acute and long-term effects of exposme to MIC. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) released approximately 2 million for research a cohort of 80,021 gas-exposed people and 15,931 controls were registered, but only 16,8 exposed subjects and 5,741 controls could be contacted in 2010 (Sharma, 2013). Researchers were not recruited to study all aspects of toxicity. No definite criteria were set to make a quantitative assessment of the exposure to MIC the best estimate has remained the distance from the Union Carbide factory (Dhara et al., 2002). A number of laboratories in the United States and United Kingdom initiated research on MIC (Environmental Health Perspective, 1987), but their interest faded quickly. The twentieth anniversary of the disaster drew the attention of the media, but not of researchers. 

Envlroiunental testing Is a critical element In this process since It enables the qualitative and quantitative determination of toxic chemicals In the environment and the definition of environmental pathways which may lead to human exposure This paper briefly reviews the overall process of health risk assessments and the particular role which environmental testing plays Recent efforts to assess environmental health risks In relation to Love Canal Illustrate both the usefulness and the limitations of environmental testing In risk assessment ... 

The toxic effects of selected plant analytes will be assessed by comparison with the toxicides of similar metabolites found in animal metabolism studies. The amount of the analytes reported in the plant metabolism study is one of the important factors used to establish the residue definition. 

With the LCA analysis, the impact categories - the impact on climate, water pollution and air pollution - are mostly evaluated. Whereas, impacts such as biodiversity or pesticide toxicity are seldom evaluated because of methodological problems [34]. The LCA study consists of four basic stages Definition of objectives and the scope, Inventory, Impact assessment and Interpretation [32]. 

After all the answers from the interviews had been uploaded, an expert analysed each supply chain for each of the seven defined criteria for quality and safety microbial toxins and abiotic contaminants potential pathogens natural plant toxicants freshness and taste nutrient content and food additives fraud social and ethical aspects. For example, an expert on freshness and taste would check each major step in a supply chain for tomatoes to determine if it fulfilled the definition of a CCP (HACCP, Principle 2) in relation to freshness and taste for this commodity. If the step was considered to be a CCP, the answers in the questionnaire that related to relevant substeps at this step would be reviewed, to assess the control procedures that were in use for this CCP. The expert would then fill in the text field, structuring the input to consist of the following points ... 

The adverse reproductive effects are considered as being threshold effects, i.e., effects for which there are expected to be a threshold of substance concentration below which the effects will not be manifested. For the hazard and risk assessment, it is important to identify those dose levels at which adverse reproductive effects are observed, and the dose level at which adverse reproductive effects are not observed, i.e., to derive a NOAEL for reproductive toxicity. Crucial in the derivation of the NOAEL and/or LOAEL, is the definition of adverse effects (Section 4.2.2). In the derivation of the NOAEL and/or LOAEL, a number of factors need to be considered these issues are addressed in detail in Sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4. An alternative approach to the derivation of the... 

It is in this context, that in 2009, the DART committee formed a Steering Team to work on a project titled Consensus List of Developmental Toxicants. The Steering Team published a report of their deliberations and defined developmental toxicant in terms of its concentration in vitro (27). Daston et al. (27) based the definitions of positive and negative developmental toxicants according to their exposure conditions. That is, compounds on the list could have an exposure concentration that is unequivocally positive and a concentration that is unequivocally negative. In addition, only permanent effects that alter fetal organization, particularly structural malformations, were considered developmental toxicity. For example, fetal weight decreases (which are commonly used endpoints in risk assessment) are not considered developmental toxicity for the purposes of this list. 

At both these times, thigh muscle contained a higher concentration of 2-PAM I than abdominal muscle, but a lower concentration of III. Dogs and rabbits appear, therefore, to tolerate repeated daily intravenous doses of 2-PAM I at 30 mg/kg or of III at 10 mg/kg during a period of 6-8 wk when the dally doses are suspended during each weekend. Because in this and the other studies reviewed the animals were killed at or soon after the end of the period of administration of an oxime, there has been no opportunity to judge whether repeated administration of an oxime may initiate some alteration in normal structure or function that will result eventually in a definite lesion. No truly chronic study of the toxicity of an oxime has been found. Thus, possible cryptic toxic effects of this type of compound have never been assessed. 

The clinical impact of dose-modification based on a genetic test needs to be prospectively assessed both in terms of toxicity and efficacy retrospective association analyses cannot by definition provide either an optimally safe or optimally efficacious dose in test-positive individuals. 

---