Time constants dynamical

Because of the time constants and dynamics associated with the top level s control and manipulated variables, setpoints are usually ramped incrementally to their new values in a manner such that the process is not disturbed and the proximity to constraints can be periodically checked before the next increment is made. 

Adaptive Control. An adaptive control strategy is one in which the controller characteristics, ie, the algorithm or the control parameters within it, are automatically adjusted for changes in the dynamic characteristics of the process itself (34). The incentives for an adaptive control strategy generally arise from two factors common in many process plants (/) the process and portions thereof are really nonlinear and (2) the process state, environment, and equipment s performance all vary over time. Because of these factors, the process gain and process time constants vary with process conditions, eg, flow rates and temperatures, and over time. Often such variations do not cause an unacceptable problem. In some instances, however, these variations do cause deterioration in control performance, and the controllers need to be retuned for the different conditions. 

First-Order Lag (Time Constant Element) Next consider the system to be the tank itself. A dynamic mass balance on the tank gives ... 

DC servo-motor. Field controlled, with transfer function as shown in Figure 4.17. It will be assumed that the field time constant LylRy is small compared with the dynamics of the machine table, and therefore can be ignored. Flence, DC servomotor gain (Nm/V). 

The time constant is one way of determining the dynamic features of a measurement system. Not all instrument manufacturers use the time constant some use the response time instead. The response time is the time between a step change of the measured quantity and the instant when the instrument s response does not differ from its final value by more than a specified amount.The response time is defined according to a deviation from the final value. Often response times for the relative deviation of 1%, 5%, 10%, or 37% are used. The corresponding response times are denoted by 99%, 95%, 90%, or 63% response time, respectively. The response time for a first-order system can be solved from Eq. (12.15). Note that the 63% response time of a first-order system is the same as the time constant r of the system. 

Time constant The time required for a dynamic component, such as a sensor, t(t reach 63.2% of the total response to a change in its input. 

To address these challenges, chemical engineers will need state-of-the-art analytical instruments, particularly those that can provide information about microstmctures for sizes down to atomic dimensions, surface properties in the presence of bulk fluids, and dynamic processes with time constants of less than a nanosecond. It will also be essential that chemical engineers become familiar with modem theoretical concepts of surface physics and chemistry, colloid physical chemistry, and rheology, particrrlarly as it apphes to free surface flow and flow near solid bormdaries. The application of theoretical concepts to rmderstanding the factors controlling surface properties and the evaluation of complex process models will require access to supercomputers. 

The dump temperature of the compound was varied by changing the mixer s rotor speed and fill factor while keeping the other mixing conditions and the mixing time constant. Under the assumption that the final dump temperature is the main parameter influencing the degree of the sUanization reaction, the effect of the presence of ZnO on the dynamic and mechanical properties of the compound was investigated. ZnO was either added on the two-roll mill or in the mixer. 

The numerical experiment started at a steady-state value of 200 C for both temperature nodes with an output of 16.89% for both heaters output number 1 was then stepped to 19.00%. If both outputs had been stepped to 19%, then both nodes would have gone to 220 C. The temperature of node 5 does not go as high, and the temperature of node 55 goes too high. In the reduced order model, the time constant x represents the effect of radial heat conduction, while the time constant X2 represents the effect of axial heat conduction. SimuSolv estimates these two parameters of the dynamic model as ... 

For a thermometer to react rapidly to changes in the surrounding temperature, the magnitude of the time constant should be small. This involves a high surface area to liquid mass ratio, a high heat transfer coefficient and a low specific heat capacity for the bulb liquid. With a large time constant, the instrument will respond slowly and may result in a dynamic measurement error. 

The dynamic error existing between and Cr depends on the relative magnitudes of the respective time constants. For the reactor, assuming a first-order, constant volume reaction... 

The ratio of the time constants, Xr/Xm, which for this case equals (k Xm) will determine whether C is significantly different from Cm. When this ratio is less than 1.0 the measurement lag will be important. If Xj/Xm >10, then Cm = Cr and the measurement dynamics become unimportant. 

For accurate dynamic measurement of process temperature, both X2 and X should be small compared with the time constant of the actual process. 

A knowledge of the relative magnitude of the time constants involved in dynamic processes is often very useful in the analysis of a given problem, since this can be used to... 

Vary L and G and observe the influence on the dynamics. Explain the results in terms of the system time constants. 

Chapter 2 is employed to provide a general introduction to signal and process dynamics, including the concept of process time constants, process control, process optimisation and parameter identification. Other important aspects of dynamic simulation involve the numerical methods of solution and the resulting stability of solution both of which are dealt with from the viewpoint of the simulator, as compared to that of the mathematician. 

In our opinion, the interesting photoresponses described by Dvorak et al. were incorrectly interpreted by the spurious definition of the photoinduced charge transfer impedance [157]. Formally, the impedance under illumination is determined by the AC admittance under constant illumination associated with a sinusoidal potential perturbation, i.e., under short-circuit conditions. From a simple phenomenological model, the dynamics of photoinduced charge transfer affect the charge distribution across the interface, thus according to the frequency of potential perturbation, the time constants associated with the various rate constants can be obtained [156,159-163]. It can be concluded from the magnitude of the photoeffects observed in the systems studied by Dvorak et al., that the impedance of the system is mostly determined by the time constant. 

The solvation dynamics of the three different micelle solutions, TX, CTAB, and SDS, exhibit time constants of 550, 285, 180 ps, respectively. The time constants show that solvent motion in these solutions is significantly slower than bulk water. The authors attribute the observed time constants to water motion in the Stern layer of the micelles. This conclusion is supported by the steady-state fluorescence spectra of the C480 probe in these solutions. The spectra exhibit a significant blue shift with respect the spectrum of the dye in bulk water. This spectral blue shift is attributed to the probe being solvated in the Stern layer and experiencing an environment with a polarity much lower than that of bulk water. 

This work also shows that the time constants for the ionic surfactant micelle solutions are twice as fast as the TX solution time constant. Differences between the Stern layers of the micelles appear to be the charge of the surfactant polar headgroups and the presence of counterions. However, these differences do not account for the observed dynamics. Since the polar headgroups and counterions should interfact more strongly with the water molecules, the water motion at the interface should be slower. This view is supported by recent investigations where systematic variation of surfactant counter-... 

Investigation of water motion in AOT reverse micelles determining the solvent correlation function, C i), was first reported by Sarkar et al. [29]. They obtained time-resolved fluorescence measurements of C480 in an AOT reverse micellar solution with time resolution of > 50 ps and observed solvent relaxation rates with time constants ranging from 1.7 to 12 ns. They also attributed these dynamical changes to relaxation processes of water molecules in various environments of the water pool. In a similar study investigating the deuterium isotope effect on solvent motion in AOT reverse micelles. Das et al. [37] reported that the solvation dynamics of D2O is 1.5 times slower than H2O motion. 

In addition, water motion has been investigated in reverse micelles formed with the nonionic surfactants Triton X-100 and Brij-30 by Pant and Levinger [41]. As in the AOT reverse micelles, the water motion is substantially reduced in the nonionic reverse micelles as compared to bulk water dynamics with three solvation components observed. These three relaxation times are attributed to bulklike water, bound water, and strongly bound water motion. Interestingly, the overall solvation dynamics of water inside Triton X-100 reverse micelles is slower than the dynamics inside the Brij-30 or AOT reverse micelles, while the water motion inside the Brij-30 reverse micelles is relatively faster than AOT reverse micelles. This work also investigated the solvation dynamics of liquid tri(ethylene glycol) monoethyl ether (TGE) with different concentrations of water. Three relaxation time scales were also observed with subpicosecond, picosecond, and subnanosecond time constants. These time components were attributed to the damped solvent motion, seg-... 

We know that G(s) contains information on the dynamic behavior of a model as represented by the differential equation. We also know that the denominator of G(s) is the characteristic polynomial of the differential equation. The roots of the characteristic equation, P(s) = 0 pb p2,... pn, are the poles of G(s). When the poles are real and negative, we also use the time constant notation ... 

In this rearrangement, xp is the process time constant, and Kd and Kp are the steady state gains.2 The denominators of the transfer functions are identical, they both are from the LHS of the differential equation—the characteristic polynomial that governs the inherent dynamic characteristic of the process. 

After this exercise, let s hope that we have a better appreciation of the different forms of a transfer function. With one, it is easier to identify the pole positions. With the other, it is easier to extract the steady state gain and time constants. It is veiy important for us to leam how to interpret qualitatively the dynamic response from the pole positions, and to make physical interpretation with the help of quantities like steady state gains, and time constants. 

There are circumstances when a complex process may involve two competing (i.e., opposing) dynamic effects that have different time constants. One example is the increase in inlet temperature to a tubular catalytic reactor with exothermic kinetics. The initial effect is that the exit temperature will momentarily decrease as increased conversion near the entrance region depletes reactants at the distal, exit end. Given time, however, higher reaction rates lead to a higher exit temperature. 

We could also modify the M-file by changing the PI controller to a PD or PID controller to observe the effects of changing the derivative time constant. (Help is in MATLAB Session 5.) We ll understand the features of these dynamic simulations better when we cover later chapters. For now, the simulations should give us a qualitative feel on the characteristics of a PID controller and (hopefully) also the feeling that we need a better way to select controller settings. 

---