Three-environment model

Figure 1.6. Four micromixing models that have appeared in the literature. From top to bottom maximum-mixedness model minimum-mixedness model coalescence-redispersion model three-environment model.

A three-environment model can be generated from this model by taking P2 = Pi and (s)2 = s)3. An example is given in Table 5.3. 

Table 5.3. The terms in the transport equations for a three-environment model.

Figure 7. Top, extension of Spencer and Leshaw s model to the case of a reactor having two inlets (unmixed feedstreams). In the general case, there are four environments (two entering, two leaving). Bottom, when the segregation function only depends on residence time, this representation is also valid (78). Three environment model with three parameters R s = exp(-R t ), ...

Criticism made to the enthalpy enhanced Three-environment model... 

With the application of an enthalpy enhanced Three-Environment Model, the progress of the reactor inlet temperature belonging to the event of extinction as a function of the fuel mass fraction of the waste water could be theoretically supported. Correspondence between theoretical and experimental results is satisfactory. The deviation of the extinction line from a flame temperature isotherm appeared to be due to a Lewis number greater than one. If the Lewis number could be lowered, the required fuel mass fraction is supposed to decrease. Experiments with different kinds of fuel as well as modified burner and inlet geometries will either support these theories or give evidence to the contrary. 

Other Lagrangian models have been proposed, in which the lagrangian equation is intended to represent fluid elements bigger than a fluid particle, with an internal structure for example the "ESCIMO" model of D.B. Spalding [29], or the "three environment model" [30], are of this type. For each of these model, the physical picture necessarily neglects some physical phenomena... with this respect these models appear similar to the "reacting laminae" models. 

Ritchie, B.W. and Togby, A.H., 1979. A three-environment micromixing model for chemical reactors with arbitrary separate feed streams. Chemical Engineering Journal, 17, 173. 

We consider a general dissipative environment, using a three-manifold model, consisting of an initial ( ), a resonant ( r ), and a final ( / ) manifold to describe the system. One specific example of interest is an interface system, where the initial states are the occupied states of a metal or a semiconductor, the intermediate (resonance) states are unoccupied surface states, and the final (product) states are free electron states above the photoemission threshold. Another example is gas cell atomic or molecular problems, where the initial, resonant, and final manifolds represent vibronic manifolds of the ground, an excited, and an ionic electronic state, respectively. 

An ecosystem can be thought of as a representative segment or model of the environment in which one is interested. Three such model ecosystems will be discussed (Figures 1 and 2). A terrestrial model, a model pond, and a model ecosystem, which combines the first two models, are described in terms of equilibrium schemes and compartmental parameters. The selection of a particular model will depend on the questions asked regarding the chemical. For example, if one is interested in the partitioning behavior of a soil-applied pesticide the terrestrial model would be employed. The model pond would be selected for aquatic partitioning questions and the model ecosystem would be employed if overall environmental distribution is considered. 

In theory, this model can be used to fix up to three moments of the mixture fraction (e.g., (c), ( 2), and (c3)). In practice, we want to choose the CFD transport equations such that the moments computed from Eqs. (34) and (35) are exactly the same as those found by solving Eqs. (28) and (29). An elegant mathematical procedure for forcing the moments to agree is the direct quadrature method of moments (DQMOM), and is described in detail in Fox (2003). For the two-environment model, the transport equations are... 

Note that the E-model is asymmetric in the sense that environment 1 always grows in probability, while environment 2 always decreases. In general, this is not a desirable feature for a CFD-based micromixing model, and can be avoided by adding a probability flux from environment 1 to environment 2, or by using three environments and letting environment 2 represent pure fluid that mixes with environment 1 to form environment 3. Examples of these models are given in Tables 5.1-5.5 at the end of this section. 

Multi-environment presumed PDF models can also be easily extended to treat cases with more than two feed streams. For example, a four-environment model for a flow with three feed streams is shown in Fig. 5.24. For this flow, the mixture-fraction vector will have two components, 2 and 22- The micromixing functions should thus be selected to agree with the variance transport equations for both components. However, in comparison with multi-variable presumed PDF methods for the mixture-fraction vector (see Section 5.3), the implementation of multi-environment presumed PDF models in CFD calculations of chemical reactors with multiple feed streams is much simpler. 

Gale, R.W. 1998, Three-compartment model for contaminant accumulation by semipermeable membrane devices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 2292-2300. 

Mitra, S. and R.M. Dickhut. 1999. Three-phase modelling of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon association with pore-water-dissolved organic carbon. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18 1144—1148. 

The fully quantum mechanical model is not yet available because of the lack of dispersion, which is currently under development [23]. Nevertheless, the results obtained so far are encouraging. In particular CMs offer from this point of view a significant advantage the same molecular system is investigated in three very different environments, namely gas phase, interface and bulk solution, with the very same method. We remark that no other method has at present the same capability when comparisons among the three environments are drawn, the use of different models thus introduces a dishomogeneity in the results obtained whose impact is not easy to evaluate [32]. 

RITCHIE, B. W. and A. H. Tobgy, A Three-Environment Micromixing Model for Chemical Reactors with Arbitrary Separate Feedstreams",... 

Computer network infrastructure should be qualified in support of validated applications. Bristol Meyer Squibb have adopted a three-level model to assist the quahfication of their computer network infrastrucmre. This approach is summarized in Table 14.3. Layer 1 comprises computers that provide shared resources such as servers, hosts, mainframes, and mini computers. Layer 2 is the network infrastrucmre (e g., hubs, routers, and switches). Layer 3 comprises the user desktop environment (i.e., workstations, personal computers, and laptops). 

---