Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Thomson theory

K. Masuda-Jindo, R. Kikuchi and R. Thomson, "Theory and Applications of the Cluster Variation and Path Probability Method" (Plenum, 1996) in press. [Pg.56]

The three-body reaction (2.5.6) has third kinetic order oidy in the moderate pressure range, usually less than 1 atm, where it can be described by Thomson theory (Thomson, 1924). At higher pressures the process is limited by ion mobihty (see the discussion that follows. According to the Thomson theory, the act of recombination takes place if negative and positive ions approach each other closer than the critical distance ... [Pg.39]

The correct formula for an incoming projectile and the target electron moving with a velocity was obtained by Thomas in the same year [17]. Unfortunately his work was forgotten, and the Thomson theory with zero initial velocity, which is in rather poor agreement with experiment, was adopted as the BEA for long time. [Pg.199]

As we saw in Chapter 3, the founding text of modern materials science was Frederick Seitz s The Modern Theory of Solids (1940) an updated version of this, also very influential in its day, was Charles Wert and Robb Thomson s Physies of Solids (1964). Alan Cottrell s Theoretical Structural Metallurgy appeared in 1948 (see Chapter 5) although devoted to metals, this book was in many ways a true precursor of materials science texts. Richard Weiss brought out Solid State Physics for Metallurgists in 1963. Several books such as Properties of Matter (1970), by Mendoza and Flowers, were on the borders of physics and materials science. Another key precursor book, still cited today, was Darken and Gurry s book. Physical Chemistry of Metals (1953), followed by Swalin s Thermodynamics of Solids. [Pg.517]

Why do we want to model molecules and chemical reactions Chemists are interested in the distribution of electrons around the nuclei, and how these electrons rearrange in a chemical reaction this is what chemistry is all about. Thomson tried to develop an electronic theory of valence in 1897. He was quickly followed by Lewis, Langmuir and Kossel, but their models all suffered from the same defect in that they tried to treat the electrons as classical point electric charges at rest. [Pg.1]

It begins with J. J. Thomson in 1881 calculating the motion of an electric charge on Maxwell s electromagnetic theory, a theme Maxwell had barely... [Pg.1035]

Having met Joule for the first time at the 1847 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Oxford, Thomson initially accepted that Joule s experiments had shown that work converted into heat. Committed to Carnot s theory of the production of work from a fall of heat, however, he could not accept the converse proposition that work had been converted into heat could simply be recovered as useful work. Therefore, he could not agree to Joule s claim for mutual convertibility. By 1848 he had appropriated from the lectures of the late Thomas Young (reprinted in the mid-1840s) the term energy as a synonym for vis viva (the term in use at the time, traditionally measured as mtc) and its equivalent terms such as work, but as yet the term appeared only in a footnote. [Pg.1137]

The origin of electronic configuration Is frequently and inaccurately attributed to Niels Bohr, who introduced quantum theory to tire study of the atom. But Bohr essentially tidied up Thomson s pre-quantum configurations and took advantage of a more accurate knowledge erf the number of electrons each of the elements actually possessed. Furtlrer developments in quantum theory, including Pauli s occlusion principle and Schrodjtiger s equation. [Pg.117]

Kohlrausch s theory leaves quite unexplained the fact that no thermoelectric current is set up in a homogeneous wire along which a current of heat is flowing, whilst the theory of Lord Kelvin is difficult to reconcile with the fact that thermoelectric currents cannot be set up in a circuit of liquid metals, although these show the Thomson effect. The latter seems, therefore, to be to a certain extent independent of the Peltier effect. Theories intended to escape these difficulties have been proposed by Planck (1889), and Duhem, in which the conception of the entropy of electricity is introduced. [Pg.454]

De Broglie received the Nobel Prize in physics in 1929, only two years after experiments confirmed his theory. Davisson, a student of Nobel laureate Robert Millikan, and Thomson, the son and student of J. J. Thomson (who won the Nobel prize for discovering the electron), shared the Nobel Prize in physics in 1937. [Pg.465]

Work by other scientists showed that cathode ray particles were indeed much smaller than hydrogen. This led Thomson to an astounding conclusion. Cathode rays must be a part of an atom, he announced to the world in 1897. This was big news. All atomic theories before this one, going back to Democritus, held that the atom was indivisible. Now, here was J.J. Thomson saying it was made up of even smaller particles. These particles were soon named electrons. [Pg.8]

This formalism was originally devised for single ionization of ground-state atoms, but has now been successfully applied to the calculation of electron impact ionization cross sections for a range of molecules, radicals, clusters, and excited state atoms. Like many of the semiempirical and semiclassical methods used to describe the electron impact process, the theory has its roots in work carried out by J.J. Thomson, who used classical mechanics to derive an expression for the atomic electron impact ionization cross section,2... [Pg.329]

The fundamental difference between ancient and modern science is not at all in the field of theory. Sir William Thomson was just as metaphysical as Pythagoras or Raymond Lully, and Lucretius quite as materialistic as Ernst Haeckel or Buchner. [Pg.48]

But if new instmments such as the spectroscope, cloud chamber, ionization chamber, and the Dolezalek electrometer allowed Thomson, Rutherford, and others to infer the existence of subatomic particles, the limitations of those instmments were obvious. Of course, they could never allow scientists to perceive an atom, much less an electron, directly the relationship between the body and mind of the observer and the object of observation was always essentially secondhand. Moreover, the relatively primitive nature of the instmments only allowed theories to progress so far. The advent of the cyclotron, the bubble chamber, and other instmments of high-energy physics were still years away. [Pg.73]

Spontaneous decarboxylations of carboxylate ions and hydrolyses of aryl phosphate dianions and aryl sulfate monoanions are much faster in organic solvents than in water (Thomson, 1970 Kemp and Paul, 1970 Bunton et al., 1967 Kirby and Varvoglis, 1967). This solvent effect is consistent with the Hughes-Ingold qualitative solvent theory because these reactions involve dispersion of charge in forming the transition state. [Pg.244]

The mathematical theory of adsorption was first developed by Willard Gibbs and later, independently, by Sir J. J. Thomson. We must confine ourselves to giving the result of their investigations. Let c be the concentration of the solute in the bulk of the solution and u the excess concentration, in grammes per square centimetre, in the surface layer u is, of course, taken as positive if the concentration... [Pg.37]

Thomson, J. J. (1904). On the structure of the atom an investigation of the stability and periods of oscillation of a number of corpuscles arranged at equal intervals around the circumference of a circle with application of the results to the theory of atomic structure. Philosophical Magazine Series 6 7 237-265. [Pg.385]


See other pages where Thomson theory is mentioned: [Pg.6]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.1032]    [Pg.1033]    [Pg.1034]    [Pg.1136]    [Pg.1137]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.400]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info