Theoretical Maximum Residue

In the calculation of chronic risks from pesticides in foods, the EPA frequently uses a deterministic approach to yield the theoretical maximum residue contribution (TMRC) for a pesticide. This value represents the maximum legal exposure to a pesticide, and assumes that ... 

This maximum legal exposure, often referred to as the Theoretical Maximum Residue Contribution, or TMRC, is compared with established toxicological criteria such as the reference dose (RfD) or Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) which represent, after analysis of animal toxicology data and extrapolations to humans, the daily exposure that is not considered to present any appreciable level of risk. When it is determined that the TMRC exposure is below the RfD or ADI, the EPA usually considers the risks from the pesticide in question to be negligible and approves the manufacturer s petition to establish a tolerance at or slightly greater than the maximum levels identified from the manufacturer s controlled field trials (Winter, 1992a). 

When calculating chronic dietary exposure, the deterministic models use point values for both food consumption and residue concentration, thereby yielding a point estimate of dietary exposure. In the US, the initial chronic dietary exposure estimate is the Theoretical Maximum Residue Contribution (TMRC) and is analogous to the Theoretical Maximum Daily Intake (TMDI) used to estimate chronic dietary exposure in the EU. Both the TMRC and the TMDI are relatively conservative estimates of dietary expostire. The TMRC is calculated as the product of the mean consumption value and the US pesticide tolerance [6]. In the EU, the TMDI is calculated as the product of the mean consumption value and the Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) [7]. The objective of both calculations is essentially identical to calculate an estimate of the central tendency of the dietary exposure. Both calculated values use the central tendency dietary exposure estimate as the estimate of chronic (long-term) dietary exposure and calculate it using mean consumption data and the maximum residue permitted on the commodity. 

Ingestion of food is examined using Theoretical Maximum Residue Contribution (TMRC) approach. 

No allowable daily intake of atrazine in the human diet has been established, although 0.0375 mg/kg BW daily has been proposed -equivalent to 2.25 mg daily for a 60-kg adult, or 1.5 mg/kg diet, based on 1.5 kg food daily. In humans, the theoretical maximum residue contribution (TRMC) - a worst case estimate of dietary exposure - is 0.77 mg daily, assuming 1.5 kg of food eaten daily this is equivalent to 0.51 mg/kg diet, or 0.013 mg/kg BW daily for a 60-kg person. Another TRMC calculation is based on 0.233 mg daily per 1.5 kg diet, equivalent to 0.156 mg/kg diet, or 0.0039 mg/kg... 

FIGURE 4.7 Four different cases with pertinent terminology involving changes in isomeric composition generating a 4 1 mixture of products, max = theoretical maximum. The expression enantiomerization of the residue is applicable in all situations. 

The n.O.e. values have, in general, paralled the Tj values and provide little additional information. Increasing n.O.e. values reflect decreasing solvent interaction for the specific carbon atom position associated with the resonance studied. Interestingly, the largest n.O.e. values observed, vl.97 (near the theoretical maximum of 1.99 for this value) is associated with resonance 3 in the spectrum of dextran B-742 fraction S. This resonance 3 corresponds to the linked C-3 position of the branching backbone residue, and model building, or even a casual inspection of the drawn structure, indicates that this is an extremely hindered position. 

The many worst-case assumptions built into cancer risk assessments are there because of policy decisions, not because of scientific ones, and they confuse attempts to allocate money effectively for public health. For example, EPA estimates of synthetic pesticide residues in the diet have used the theoretical maximum human residue that is anticipated under the most severe field application conditions, which is often a large overestimate compared to the measured residues in food. Despite the EPA s estimated high risks from exposures to several pesticides, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration detected no residues of those pesticides in the food samples in its Total Diet Study.59... 

Figure 4.19(a) shows the concentration of water vapor on the feed and permeate sides of the membrane module in the case of a simple counter-flow module. On the high-pressure side of the module, the water vapor concentration in the feed gas drops from 1000 ppm to about 310 ppm halfway through the module and to 100 ppm at the residue end. The graph directly below the module drawing shows the theoretical maximum concentration of water vapor on the permeate side of the membrane. This maximum is determined by the feed-to-permeate pressure ratio of 20 as described in the footnote to page 186. The actual calculated permeate-side concentration is also shown. The difference between these two lines is a measure of the driving force for water vapor transport across the membrane. At the feed end of the module, this difference is about 1000 ppm, but at the permeate end the difference is only about 100 ppm. 

To determine the possible exposure level via the food, the "theoretical daily intake" (TDl) was calculated. This figure was derived by utilizing data on the rate of disappearance of the food item in Canada, provided by Statistics Canada, and determining from these data, the consumption of the crop per capita (assuming disappearance rate and consumption to be comparable). It was assumed that the total crop could have residues present at about the level of analytical sensitivity of the method of detection. Thus based on the consumption level and the maximum residue level, an estimate of exposure from each crop can be calculated. The total exposure from all crops is the TDI. 

Figure 18 Theoretical and observed crack depth vs. operational time relationships for 28-inch-diameter schedule 80 type 304 stainless steel piping for two BWRs operating at different mean coolant conductivities. Note the bracketing of the maximum crack depth in the lower-puiity plant by the predicted curve that is based on the maximum residual stress profile and the predicted absence of observable cracking in the higher-purity plant (in 240 operating months).

Disubstituted aliphatic oxiranes have been reported to be hydrolyzed by EHs from fungi [131], yeast, and bacteria. The most interesting results were observed with yeast and bacterial EHs. As far as kinetic resolution is concerned, it was shown by Weijers [116] that R. glutinis catalyzed the enantioselective hydrolysis of cis-2,3- and trans-2,3-epoxypentane, resulting in residual (2R)-epoxides with yields that approached the theoretical maximum of 50%. More interestingly, biocatalytic transformations of racemic 2,3-disubstituted oxiranes to vicinal diols with high ees at... 

Theoretically, at a low Uappl the counteraction would be expected to result in full polarization of the electrodes, i.e., would become equal to Eappl, so no current will be passed however, the actual pc,2 at the electrode surface is continuously diminished by diffusion of the Cl2 gas into the solution and so there results a residual current, i = (2 appl - E fR. The amount of the latter increases more or less gradually with increasing Uappl, because the actual pC 2 increases until it finally becomes 1 atm, where Cl2 gas starts to escape from the solution. In the meantime, the anode has been completely covered with Zn metal, so that [Zn] has become unity. In fact, E has now attained a constant maximum value, the so-called decomposition potential, where electrolysis really breaks through. Any further increase in app) would, according to first expectations, cause a linear current increase, i = ( app, - Edecomp )IR. However, Fig. 3.2 shows that the experimental current curve deviates more and... 

---