Theorell

Riboflavin was first isolated from whey in 1879 by Blyth, and the structure was determined by Kuhn and coworkers in 1933. For the structure determination, this group isolated 30 mg of pure riboflavin from the whites of about 10,000 eggs. The discovery of the actions of riboflavin in biological systems arose from the work of Otto Warburg in Germany and Hugo Theorell in Sweden, both of whom identified yellow substances bound to a yeast enzyme involved in the oxidation of pyridine nucleotides. Theorell showed that riboflavin 5 -phosphate was the source of the yellow color in this old yellow enzyme. By 1938, Warburg had identified FAD, the second common form of riboflavin, as the coenzyme in D-amino acid oxidase, another yellow protein. Riboflavin deficiencies are not at all common. Humans require only about 2 mg per day, and the vitamin is prevalent in many foods. This vitamin... 

Mutual exclusivity can also be tested for by the effects of combinations of two inhibitors on the activity of a target enzyme. The advantage of this approach is that it does not require any special labeling of either compound, and only catalytic quantities of enzyme are required for the studies. There are a number of graphical methods that can be used to determine the effects of inhibitor combinations on enzyme velocity (see Copeland, 2000). The most popular of these was introduced by Yonetani and Theorell (1964) and is based on the following reciprocal equation ... 

To determine the value of y, Yonetani and Theorell suggest measuring reaction velocity at several fixed concentrations of one inhibitor while titrating the second inhibitor. The reciprocal of velocity (l/v0) is then plotted as a function of concentration for the titrated inhibitor (Figure 3.11). If the two compounds are binding in a mutually exclusive fashion, this type of plot results in a series of parallel lines (Figure 3.11A). If the two compounds bind independently (y = 1) the lines in the... 

Figure 3.11 Yonetani-Theorell plots for determining mutual exclusivity of two inhibitors. (A) Plot for two inhibitors that bind in a mutually exclusive fashion to a target enzyme (B) plot for two inhibitors that bind independently (y = 1) to the same target enzyme.

Yonetani-Theorell plot will converge at the jc-axis. When y is finite but not unity, the lines intersect above or below the jc-axis. For any Yonetani-Theorell plot that displays intersecting lines, the jc-axis value (i.e.,. /]) that corresponds to the point of intersection will yield the value of -jKj. If K and Kt have been determined independently, one can easily calculate the value of y from the point of intersection in a Yonetani-Theorell plot. 

Yonetani-Theorell analysis can be quite useful in determining whether chemically distinct noncompetitive inhibitors are likely to share a common binding pocket on a target enzyme. This information can be very valuable in defining strategies for parallel SAR studies on two or more chemical series of inhibitiors. 

The disadvantages associated with HRP are several. The enzyme only contains two available primary e-amine groups—extraordinarily low for most proteins—thus limiting its ability to be activated with amine-reactive heterobifunctionals. HRP is sensitive to the presence of many antibacterial agents, especially azide. It also is reversibly inhibited by cyanide and sulfide (Theorell, 1951). Finally, while the enzymatic activity of HRP is extremely high, its useful lifespan or practical substrate development time is somewhat limited. After about an hour of substrate turnover, in some situations its activity can be decreased severely. 

Tl. Theorell, H., tlber die Hemmung der Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit durch Phosphat in Warburg s und Christian s System. Biochem. Z. 275, 416-421 (1935). 

Theorell, H. and Chance, B. (1951). Studies on liver alcohol dehydrogenase, Acta Chem. Scand., 5, 1127-1144. 

Fig. 2. The Bonnichsen, Chance, and Theorell 34) mechanism for the dismutation of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. (A) The simple ping-pong mechanism (ferric-peroxide compound (ycle) involves only the successive formation and decomposition of the compound 1 intermediate by two successive molecules of H2O2. (B) Reversible ES(Fe -H202) and ternary (compound I-H2O2]) complexes are added to the mechanism in A.

Different abortives may be formed with alternative products or substrates. Such procedures can be useful in helping to distinguish Theorell-Chance mechanisms from ordered systems with abortive complexes . In the case of lactate dehydrogenase, the E-pyruvate-NAD+ and E-lactate-NADH abortive complexes may play a regulatory roles in aerobic versus anaerobic metabolism. 

The topologically defined region(s) on an enzyme responsible for the binding of substrate(s), coenzymes, metal ions, and protons that directly participate in the chemical transformation catalyzed by an enzyme, ribo-zyme, or catalytic antibody. Active sites need not be part of the same protein subunit, and covalently bound intermediates may interact with several regions on different subunits of a multisubunit enzyme complex. See Lambda (A) Isomers of Metal Ion-Nucleotide Complexes Lock and Key Model of Enzyme Action Low-Barrier Hydrogen Bonds Role in Catalysis Yaga-Ozav /a Plot Yonetani-Theorell Plot Induced-Fit Model Allosteric Interaction... 

Rate experiments that are typically carried out in the presence of different concentrations of an alternative product (or product analog) while using the normal substrates . This approach can be particularly useful when the normal product cannot be used because it is unstable, insoluble, or ineffective (the latter indicated by a very high Ki value). Moreover, the normal product may be consumed as an essential substrate in a coupled assay system for the primary enzyme. Fromm and Zewe used the alternative product inhibition approach in their study of hexokinase. Wratten and Cleland later applied this procedure to exclude the Theorell-Chance mechanism for liver alcohol dehydrogenase. See Abortive Complexes... 

A system for describing kinetic mechanisms for enzyme-catalyzed reactions . Reactants (ie., substrates) are symbolized by the letters A, B, C, D, eto., whereas products are designated by P, Q, R, S, etc. Reaction schemes are also identified by the number of substrates and products utilized (i.e.. Uni (for one), Bi (two), Ter (three occasionally Tri), Quad (four), Quin (five), etc. Thus, a two-substrate, three-product enzyme-catalyzed reaction would be a Bi Ter system. In addition, reaction schemes are identified by the pattern of substrate addition to the enzyme s active site as well as the release of products. For a two-substrate, one-product scheme in which either substrate can bind to the free enzyme, the enzyme scheme is designated a random Bi Uni mechanism. If the substrates bind in a distinct order (note that, in such cases, A binds before B for ordered multiproduct release, P is released prior to Q, etc.), the scheme would be ordered Bi Uni. If the binding scheme is different than the release of product, then that information should also be provided for example, a two-substrate, two-product reaction in which the substrates bind to the enzyme in an ordered fashion whereas the products are released randomly would be designated ordered on, random off Bi Bi scheme. If one or more Theorell-Chance steps are present, that information is also given (e.g., ordered Bi Bi-(Theorell-Chance)), with the prefixes included if there is more than one Theorell-Chance step. 

Alberty first proposed the use of Haldane relations to distinguish among the ordered Bi Bi, the ordered Bi Bi Theorell-Chance, and the rapid equilibrium random Bi Bi mechanisms. Nordlie and Fromm used Haldane relationships to rule out certain mechanisms for ribitol dehydrogenase. 

Haldane is also valid for the ordered Bi Bi Theorell-Chance mechanism and the rapid equilibrium random Bi Bi mechanism. The reverse reaction of the yeast enzyme is easily studied an observation not true for the brain enzyme, even though both enzymes catalyze the exact same reaction. A crucial difference between the two enzymes is the dissociation constant (i iq) for Q (in this case, glucose 6-phosphate). For the yeast enzyme, this value is about 5 mM whereas for the brain enzyme the value is 1 tM. Hence, in order for Keq to remain constant (and assuming Kp, and are all approximately the same for both enzymes) the Hmax,f/f max,r ratio for the brain enzyme must be considerably larger than the corresponding ratio for the yeast enzyme. In fact, the differences between the two ratios is more than a thousandfold. Hence, the Haldane relationship helps to explain how one enzyme appears to be more kmeticaUy reversible than another catalyzing the same reaction. 

---