Theorell-Chance, enzyme mechanism

A Theorell-Chance enzyme mechanism is one in which the steady-state concentration of the central complex is effectively zero. In the case of a Bi Bi reaction, it may be represented as ... 

Xylitol dehydrogenase converts xylitol to the 2-ketopentose xylulose and the tetrameric enzyme from Galactocandida mastotermitis has been shown to possess one essential Zn " per monomer. As expected, binding is ordered with the cofactor binding first however, binding of carbohydrate is so weak that a Theorell-Chance kinetic mechanism obtains (he. one in which there is a bimolecular reaction between E.NAD and xylitol, without detectable E.NAD ". xylitol or E.NADEI.xylulose complexes). 

Rate experiments that are typically carried out in the presence of different concentrations of an alternative product (or product analog) while using the normal substrates . This approach can be particularly useful when the normal product cannot be used because it is unstable, insoluble, or ineffective (the latter indicated by a very high Ki value). Moreover, the normal product may be consumed as an essential substrate in a coupled assay system for the primary enzyme. Fromm and Zewe used the alternative product inhibition approach in their study of hexokinase. Wratten and Cleland later applied this procedure to exclude the Theorell-Chance mechanism for liver alcohol dehydrogenase. See Abortive Complexes... 

A system for describing kinetic mechanisms for enzyme-catalyzed reactions . Reactants (ie., substrates) are symbolized by the letters A, B, C, D, eto., whereas products are designated by P, Q, R, S, etc. Reaction schemes are also identified by the number of substrates and products utilized (i.e.. Uni (for one), Bi (two), Ter (three occasionally Tri), Quad (four), Quin (five), etc. Thus, a two-substrate, three-product enzyme-catalyzed reaction would be a Bi Ter system. In addition, reaction schemes are identified by the pattern of substrate addition to the enzyme s active site as well as the release of products. For a two-substrate, one-product scheme in which either substrate can bind to the free enzyme, the enzyme scheme is designated a random Bi Uni mechanism. If the substrates bind in a distinct order (note that, in such cases, A binds before B for ordered multiproduct release, P is released prior to Q, etc.), the scheme would be ordered Bi Uni. If the binding scheme is different than the release of product, then that information should also be provided for example, a two-substrate, two-product reaction in which the substrates bind to the enzyme in an ordered fashion whereas the products are released randomly would be designated ordered on, random off Bi Bi scheme. If one or more Theorell-Chance steps are present, that information is also given (e.g., ordered Bi Bi-(Theorell-Chance)), with the prefixes included if there is more than one Theorell-Chance step. 

Haldane is also valid for the ordered Bi Bi Theorell-Chance mechanism and the rapid equilibrium random Bi Bi mechanism. The reverse reaction of the yeast enzyme is easily studied an observation not true for the brain enzyme, even though both enzymes catalyze the exact same reaction. A crucial difference between the two enzymes is the dissociation constant (i iq) for Q (in this case, glucose 6-phosphate). For the yeast enzyme, this value is about 5 mM whereas for the brain enzyme the value is 1 tM. Hence, in order for Keq to remain constant (and assuming Kp, and are all approximately the same for both enzymes) the Hmax,f/f max,r ratio for the brain enzyme must be considerably larger than the corresponding ratio for the yeast enzyme. In fact, the differences between the two ratios is more than a thousandfold. Hence, the Haldane relationship helps to explain how one enzyme appears to be more kmeticaUy reversible than another catalyzing the same reaction. 

A sequential enzyme-catalyzed binding mechanism for a two substrate-two product system in which substrates A and B have to bind in a certain order but either P or Q can be released in a Theorell-Chance step upon the binding of B. Following this step, the other substrate is... 

Chance Bi Bi mechanism. (This expression also applies to isomerization mechanisms for the ordered and Theorell-Chance schemes in which a stable enzyme form undergoes isomerization.) The points of intersection for each different mechanism can be used to exclude certain possibilities, depending on the quality of the rate data. 

A two-substrate, two-product enzyme-catalyzed reaction scheme in which either substrate, A or B, can bind first. However, the second substrate participates in a Theorell-Chance step in which either one of the two products is released. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

ADH features another catalytic triad, Ser-Tyr-Lys. Whereas the liver ADH kinetic mechanism is highly ordered, coenzyme associating first and dissociating last, the yeast ADH mechanism is largely random. In both cases, the actual chemical reaction is a hydride transfer. In the oxidation of secondary alcohols by Drosophila ADH (DADH), the release of NADH from the enzyme-NADH complex is the rate-limiting step, so vmax is independent of the chemical nature of the alcohol. With primary alcohols, as vmax is much lower and depends on the nature of alcohol, Theorell-Chance kinetics are not observed and the rate-limiting step is the chemical interconversion from alcohol to aldehyde. 

Theorell-Chance This special case of the ordered bi-bi mechanism occurs if the first product P dissociates from the enzyme very rapidly and an EAB-, EPQ-complex does not occur in a significant concentration. (Example alcohol-dehydrogenase)... 

LADHee and that the activity disappeared after carboxymethylation of a cysteine residue at the active site of LADH s [145]. In a recent study by Okuda and Okuda it was demonstrated that the -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity in human liver was associated with a major isoenzyme of liver alcohol dehydrogenase (/82, 2) that the activity was inhibited by a chelating agent for Zn, which resides in the active site of the enzyme [146], Kinetic studies with the highly purified isoenzyme showed that neither a Theorell-Chance mechanism nor a simple ordered BiBi mechanism applied to the reaction. Evidence was obtained that the reaction was asymmetric in both directions. It has been established by Fukuba that the 4A-hydro-gen in NADH is involved [147]. 

The main value of product inhibition studies of dehydrogenases has been to distinguish between ordered and random mechanisms and to provide additional kinetic estimates of the dissociation constants of enzyme-coenzyme compounds. On both counts the method has been especially useful for reactions that are essentially irreversible or for other reasons cannot be studied in both directions 122,138). It is also in such circumstances that product inhibition studies are most reliable because, as Alberty (7) emphasized when proposing the method, with readily reversible reactions it may be difficult to estimate true initial rates with small concentrations of substrates in the presence of a product. The reality of ternary complexes in an ordered mechanism of the Theorell-Chance type has also been demonstrated with several enzymes (134) by product inhibition studies. 

What this really means is that the ternary complex has such a transitory existence that it never makes up a significant fraction of the total amount of enzyme. Steady-state kinetics concerns itself only with those complexes which, by their existence, detectably alter the pattern of dependence of reaction rate on substrate concentration. The Theorell-Chance mechanism may be seen perhaps as a manifestation of highly effective catalysis. Certainly, in the case of the enzyme for which it was first described, horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase, the mechanism is obeyed for good substrates i.e. short-chain primary alcohols with secondary alcohols, which are poor substrates, the ternary complex becomes kinetically significant - because it works less well [44]. 

There are two Haldanes for Ordered Uni Bi mechanism, with n = 1, and two for Ordered Bi Bi, but the second one depends on the definition of the inhibition constants. Ping Pong mechanisms with two stable enzyme forms have four Haldanes, one each with n = 0 and n = 2, and two with n = 1. The Theorell-Chance mechanism with only six rate constants has 16 Haldanes with n equal to minus one (1), zero (4), one (6), two (4), and three (1), corresponding to 4,3,2,1, and 0 inhibition constants, respectively. Ordered mechanisms that are of Ter reactancy in either direction have two Haldanes, with n = 0 and n = (Cleland, 1982). 

Thus, for a simple Ordered Bi Bi mechanism, the above ratios are always greater than unity. Values close to unity indicate that the dissociation of the product Q or a substrate A (usually the coenzymes with dehydrogenases) determines the maximum rate, that is, a Theorell-Chance mechanism. The values much greater than unity are inconsistent with a simple ordered mechanism, and suggest an isomerization of the enzyme-substrate complexes. 

The value of R varies from zero for a Theorell-Chance mechanism to 1.0 for a RapidEquUibrium OirieiedBi Bi system. If V, and Va are unequal, R indicates the rate-limiting step in the slower direction only. In this case, R gives the fraction of the total enzyme present as the central complexes when both substrates for the slower direction are saturating. The ratio/ /(1-R)then gives the ratio of the central complexes to aU other enzyme species present. 

There are two possible bisubstrate systems that combine the enzyme feature of the Ping Pong sequence with the hit-and-mn feature of the Theorell-Chance mechanism. These are in fact the hmiting cases of the common Ping Pong Bi Bi system, in which one of two central complexes has extremely short life. The reaction sequences are shown below ... 

Chance (1943) and Theorell Chance (1951) observed the formation and decomposition of complexes of enzymes with substrates and products by following changes in light absorption. In these pioneering studies the theories and techniques of pre-steady-state kinetics were only applied to reactions in which the complexes had distinct absorption spectra. It became apparent that transients of a much wider range of enzyme reactions could be studied when the initial rate of product formation is analysed (Gut-freund, 1955). Observations with a time resolution of milliseconds showed that there are often three distinct phases in product formation. These are determined in turn by the rate of formation of the enzyme-substrate complex, the enzyme-product complex and of free product. Of course, as we shall see, the most fruitful investigations into enzyme mechanisms resulted when it was possible to combine the observation of transients of product formation with those of spectral changes of complexes. 

The classical steady-state studies of Theorell and Chance showed that the increased affinity for substrate by the NADH-bound enzyme leads to a distinct sequence of the binding of coenzyme and substrate and subsequent reaction.1442. The binding of coenzyme is a compulsory step prior to substrate binding. Release of products from the enzyme site occurs via reversal of the sequence. This mechanism, known as an ordered bi-bi mechanism because of the required order of association and dissociation of the coenzyme and substrate with ternary complex formation is summarized in Scheme 6, where E, S and P represent enzyme, substrate and product respectively. 

---