Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The sessile drop

Consider a very large sessile drop, part of a principal vertical section of which is shown in Fig. 7.7. Any small part of the circumference in a plane parallel to the solid surface may be taken as straight, so that only curvatures in a vertical plane need be considered. [Pg.187]

If the integration is performed over the range = 0 to y = H, the total height of the drop, 0, varies from zero, when y is zero, to 0, the angle of contact, when j equals H, Then  [Pg.189]


The cases of the sessile drop and bubble are symmetrical, as illustrated in Fig. n-16. The profile is also that of a meniscus 0 is now positive and, as an... [Pg.27]

The following values for the surface tension of a 10 Af solution of sodium oleate at 25°C are reported by various authors (a) by the capillary rise method, y - 43 mN/m (b) by the drop weight method, 7 = 50 mN/m and (c) by the sessile drop method, 7 = 40 mN/m. Explain how these discrepancies might arise. Which value should be the most reliable and why ... [Pg.41]

The most commonly used techniques for contact angle measurements are the sessile drop method and the Wil-helmy plate method. Results obtained from these two methods are in good agreement. [Pg.519]

The sessile drop method has several drawbacks. Several days elapse between each displacement, and total test times exceeding one month are not uncommon. It can be difficult to determine that the interface has actually advanced across the face of the crystal. Displacement frequency and distance are variable and dependent upon the operator. Tests are conducted on pure mineral surfaces, usually quartz, which does not adequately model the heterogeneous rock surfaces in reservoirs. There is a need for a simple technique that gives reproducible data and can be used to characterize various mineral surfaces. The dynamic Wilhelmy plate technique has such a potential. This paper discusses the dynamic Wilhelmy plate apparatus used to study wetting properties of liquid/liquid/solid systems important to the oil industry. [Pg.560]

Far from a wellbore, the velocity of reservoir fluids is about one linear foot per day. Near a wellbore, the velocity can increase one-hundred fold. A static or quasi-static test such as the sessile drop (contact angle) test may not represent the dynamic behavior of the fluids in the field. The dynamic Wilhelmy device gives results which are comparable in interface velocity to the field displacement rate. The interface in the Wilhelmy test described here moved at a steady rate of 0.127 mm/sec or 36 ft/day. The wetting cycle for a hybrid-wetting crude oil system was not affected by moving at a rate less than 1 ft/day. [Pg.565]

The four-to-six day duration of the dynamic Wilhelmy tests (wherein equilibrium actually occurred after one day) were much shorter than the times generally required for the sessile drop test. The conventional contact angle measurements on oil from the fields mentioned above required up to 48 days (12). [Pg.570]

One of the most common ways to characterize the hydrophobicity (or hydrophilicity) of a material is through measurement of the contact angle, which is the angle between the liquid-gas interface and the solid surface measured at the triple point at which all three phases interconnect. The two most popular techniques to measure contact angles for diffusion layers are the sessile drop method and the capillary rise method (or Wihelmy method) [9,192]. [Pg.251]

For the DMFC, Zhang et al. [127] used the sessile drop method to study the wettabilities of liquid methanol solutions on the surface of the anode DLs and MPLs. They were able to observe that the contact angles of the materials were the smallest with low PTFE content. In addition, the effect of Nafion ionomer content on the MPL (to increase hydrophilicity see Section 4.3.2) was also shown through the contact angle measurements (i.e., smaller contact angles compared to MPLs with PTFE). [Pg.251]

In addition to the sessile drop method which measures the contact angle directly, Neumann and Renzow (1969) have developed the Wilhelmy slide technique to measure it to 0.1° precision. As shown in Fig. 2.20, the meniscus at a partially immersed plate rises to a finite length, h, if the contact angle, 0, is finite. 6 is calculated from... [Pg.34]

The antistatic properties of the step 2 product were evaluated by preparing tapes of blends with polystyrene by extruding in a twin-screw extruder using a flat die at 200°C. The contact angle of the tapes was measured using the sessile drop method and water as the measuring liquid. Testing data not supplied by author. [Pg.246]

Important techniques to measure the surface tension of liquids are the sessile drop method, the pendant or sessile bubble method, the Du-Notiy ring tensiometer, and the Wilhelmy-plate method. [Pg.24]

Contact angles are commonly measured by the sessile drop, the captive bubble, and the Wilhelmy plate method. To characterize the wetting properties of powders the capillary rise method is used. [Pg.144]

Some of the commonly used techniques for measuring contact angle [215, 216, 217] are the sessile drop method, captive bubble method and Wilhelmy plate method. These techniques have been extensively used and well documented for characterisation of modified PE surfaces [218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230] for various applications. Whitesides et al. [231 ] studied the wetting of flame-treated polyethylene film having ionisable organic acids and bases at the polymer-water interface. The effect of the size of substituted alkyl groups in amide and ester moieties on the surface hydrophilicity was also studied [232]. The biocompatibility of the polyethylene film surface modified with various water-soluble polymers was evaluated using the same technique [233]. The surface properties of hy-perbranched polymers have been very recently reported [234]. [Pg.273]

The pendant drop method and the sessile drop methods for surface tension appear quite different, but are similar in principle. In each case a drop is formed which either sits on a plane surface (sessile, see Figure 3.10) or hangs as a pendant drop... [Pg.66]

The sessile drop method can also be used for the determination of contact angle (Section 3.4). [Pg.67]

The captive drop and captive bubble methods, variations of the sessile drop method, have been developed for the determination of very low values of surface or interfacial tension [140,141], including at elevated temperature and pressure [141]. [Pg.67]

Two common methods for measuring contact angles are the sessile drop and tilting plate methods. [Pg.74]

The sessile drop method, described in Section 3.2.3, can also be used for the determination of contact angle. A sessile drop is created as for surface tension measurement, but instead of measuring drop shape, the contact angle (0) is measured through the liquid phase (Figure 3.16). This can be done using a goniometer. [Pg.74]

Static contact angle measurement of the sessile drop. The contact angle, 6C, is the angle formed by a liquid drop at the three-phase boundary where a liquid, a gas, and a solid intersect. It depends on the interfacial surface tensions between gas and liquid nGL, liquid and solid nLS, and gas and solid IIGS, as given by Young s6 equation of 1805 ... [Pg.275]

RH and at 25°C. using the sessile drop method. Surface tensions were measured at 25°C. using the duNouy ring method. Unless otherwise noted in the text, the contact angles were reproducible to 2° and the critical surface tensions to 0.5 dynes/cm. [Pg.51]

The wettability of diamond with Ni-Mn alloys having Ga, Ge, Sn, Mg, A1 and Si additives was determined by means of the sessile drop method at high pressure (5.5 GPa) and temperature (1400° C) following a special procedure [3,4]. The metal pellet melted and attained its equilibrium form owing to surface forces on the diamond plane surrounded by molten NaCl that gives a quasi-hydrostatic enviroment and suppress oxidation of the metal. [Pg.504]

The chemical structure and composition of films deposited onto the Al substrates was determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a Perkin Elmer PHI 548 instrument. Measurement of advancing and receding water contact angles (aa and or, to 3°) were carried out by the sessile drop technique, using a Rame Hart contact angle goniometer (10 ). [Pg.172]

Wetting experiments with liquid tin on heterogeneous surfaces composed of oxide glass ceramic (a) and molybdenum (/ ) with 0 = 125° and 0 = 18° were performed using the sessile drop technique (Voitovich 1992, Naidich et al. 1995). [Pg.39]


See other pages where The sessile drop is mentioned: [Pg.29]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.67]   


SEARCH



Sessile

Sessile drop

© 2024 chempedia.info