The allocation of capacity

The capacity will be allocated to one or more types of products in several steps. Hrst we detmnine which of the types is the most important type, of course with a sufficient number of penalty points. If the number of orders for this most important type is less than or equal to the available capacity, then all the orders for this type will be produced. If not, then we will start with the orders with the earliest due date and if orders have the same due date we will start with the orders with the highest priority. The allocation of the capacity stops if all the normal available capacity has been allocated and if the number of periods until the due dates of the remaining orders is larger than some priority-dependent constant. If there are remaining orders for which the number of periods until the due date is not larger than this priority-dependent constant, then extra capacity will be used to produce these orders. In Example 7.1. we will consider orders with two different priorities normal and urgent orders. For the normal orders we will use extra capacity for all orders with a residual lead time that is less than or equal to one period. For the urgent orders we will use extra capacity for all orders with a residual lead time that is less than or equal to two periods. 

First we will consider the situation with one machine. After the capacity allocation for the most important type, there can be some capacity available for the production of another type. If the amount of available capacity is at least mcl and if there is another type with a sufficient number of penalty points, then we will allocate capacity to the most important type among the other types. This allocation will be done in exactly the same way as the allocation for the first type. The allocation continues with other types until either the available capacity is less than mcl, or until there are no more types with a sufficient number of penalty points or until the multi-type level L has been reached. 

In the situation with several identical machines the allocation of capacity can be done in a similar way. If there are several different machines the allocation will be made differently. We have to determine the most important type for every machine. Now, the most important types are not simply the types with the highest number of penalty points, but they have to be found by considering the production possibilities on the different machines. This will be worked out in the next subsection. If the most important types have been determined then the available capacity for the important types is allocated in the same way as in the situation with one machine. The capacity allocation for the other types which may be produced in the same period is determined in a slightly different way. This will also be discussed in the next subsection. 

---

Supply chain network design decisions include the assignment of facility role location of manufacturing-, storage-, or transportation-related facilities and the allocation of capacity and markets to each facility. Supply chain network design decisions are classified as follows ... 

When ordering multiple products under a limited supply capacity, the allocation of capacity to products should be based on their expected marginal contrihntion to profits. This approach allocates a relatively higher fraction of capacity to products that have a high margin relative to their cost of overstocking. 

At processing complexes, central utiUties and other faciUties are shared by several battery-limits process plants. The capital cost of a central utiUty is sometimes charged to the capital cost of each battery-limits plant as an allocated capital cost based on the unit capital cost of the utiUty faciUty and the units of capacity of the utiUty required by the plant. In this case, the use charge per unit consumed only covers operating expenses. The alternative is to recover utihty capital costs, as well as operating expense, in the unit usage charge. 

The decision theory is valid for variable costs but does not consider the problem of capacity allocation. In many contexts, screening capacity is a sunk cost, and there is a need to consider the straw that broke the camel s back, the first compound that exceeds capacity. There is no need to ration resources that are not scarce and have trivial variable costs relative to the potential value that their use can create. This reasoning leads naturally back to use of easily understood, intuitive flow and capacity visualizations for the relevant simulations. 

Production planning includes considerations on production objectives over a certain time horizon given marketing forecasts for prices and product demands, equipment availability, and inventories. This is a macrolevel problem of the allocation of production capacity, time, product inventories, and labour and energy resources, so as to determine the production goals that maximize the total profit over an extended period of time into the future (e.g. a few months to a few years). 

The reactors are not considered individually but they are aggregated to a group of identical processing units with an overall capacity of four. The allocation of the reactors is not modeled explicitly, but they induce constraints on the start times of the polymerizations. Based on the as sumption that all four reactors can be used and that they are allocated in turns, the intervals between tn and tn+4 [n = 1... N — 4) must be greater than or equal to the processing time of a polymerization dp (with dp= 17) ... 

The Interactions between availability of resources, carbon gaining capacity, and the allocation of carbon to plant functions, Including chemical defense, will obviously differ among environments. We examine a particular system, the temperate deciduous forest, to Illustrate the nature of the constraints on chemical defenses Imposed by limitations on carbon gain. 

Several new processes have also been developed in order to facilitate capacity allocation and booking. The booking of capacity is applicable at the different entry and exit zones as defined by the Tariff Regulation. The booking is thus booking for entry capacity, process capacity and exit capacity. 

Formulas for new entrants. For most sectors, the rules for new entrants were tied to the addition of capacity (whether to a new site or an existing site) of the covered activity explicitly referred to in the Directive. This meant that certain types of capacity expansion (for example de-bottlenecking at chemicals installations) would not qualify for new entrant allocations.9 The basic formula used for new entrants in most sectors can be summarised as follows ... 

Capacity planning for the product-development process involves proper quantity and time allocation of coworkers, application system capacities, and other partial tasks of tui individual process (Golm 1996). Therefore, the goed of capacity planning is to ensure the on-schedule processing of the entire process and the uniform utilization of resources. 

This model shows that it may make sense to have more capacity than required in some periods in order to save overall costs to cover demand across all periods. In other words, since the shifts are not flexible to the specific demand requirements over time, the extra slack capacity in some periods enables the supply demand mismatch to be solved cost effectively. It is thus worth considering the allocation of shifts to employees to optimize overall supply costs. 

A typical problem in the steel industry concerns the allocation of orders to leftover surplus stock ([71]). The problem of matching unique customer requirements to existing inventory is termed the surplus inventory matching problem. The surplus stock arises because orders maybe canceled after units are produced, because produced units are below acceptable quality levels, or because surplus units had been intentionally created to reduce customer lead times. While this problem is described from the context of steel mills and paper mills, the problem can be framed in a more general form, e.g., as dealing with leftover trucking capacity or production capacity. 

Performance requirements are divided into allocable sets and are directly allocated to functions. Requirements that are not directly allocable, such as range, should be translated into derived performance requirements, such as fuel capacity, engine efficiency, and vehicle resistance, through appropriate engineering techniques and analyses. The enterprise documents the allocation of system performance requirements to functions to provide traceability and to facilitate later changes. 

The Council of the European Union, 2004, Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EiC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive) . 

An emergent research direction is the examination of mechanisms for decentralized allocation (for multi-item procurement) in the presence of capacity constraints at the suppliers. We discuss two mechanisms that have been proposed in the literature. Both are reverse auctions with a single buyer and multiple suppliers but differ in (i) bid structure that they support and (ii) the feedback that is provided. Both mechanisms assume that a partial allocation against a bid is acceptable to the bidders. 

With its immense capacity for adsorption from gas and liquid phases, activated carbon is a unique material. It occupies a special place in terms of producing a clean environment involving water purification as well as separations and purification in the chemical and associated industries. In these roles, it exhibits a remarkable efficiency as the international production is a little more than half a million tonnes per year, with perhaps 2 million tonnes being in continuous use. This is equivalent to the allocation of 200 mg per person of the world population to be compared with the world use of fossil fuels of 2 tonnes per person of the world population. 

The passenger shall be notified to a queue common to all air operations. In the next step, depending on the availability of capacity of the unloading areas may move to an entry area. Because the simulation model applies to the double security screening counter (common metal detector for two lanes), entry area divides the input stream into two independent streams ELS—entry left stream, ERS—entry right stream) and allocating passengers in one of them. The capacity for ELS stream is equal to ... 

---