Surface water, drift

The preparation of soils for crops, planting, and tilling raises dust as a fugitive emission. Such operations are shll exempt from air pollution regulations in most parts of the world. The application of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides is also exempt from air pollution regulations, but other regulations may cover the drift of these materials or runoff into surface waters. This is particularly true of the materials are hazardous or toxic. 

Verro et al. [53] evaluated the risk associated with the presence of alachlor herbicide in surface waters (released by drift and runoff) from Lombardia region (Northern Italy). They applied a GIS-based model for representing the obtained PECs in risk maps showing a static image of a worst-case simulation in each river subbasin. 

Pesticide) Alachlor Lombardia Region (Northern Surface water Italy) - Meteorological data - Application rate - Active ingredient lost by drift - Percentage of active ingredient lost by runoff [53]... 

Szramek, K Walter, L.M. and McCall, P. (2004) Arsenic mobility in groundwater/surface water systems in carbonate-rich Pleistocene glacial drift aquifers (Michigan). Applied Geochemistry, 19(7), 1137-55. 

Although the downward transport of triazines by water is the most important route in evaluating the potential for presence in groundwater, other modes of transport away from the site of application should also be taken into consideration. These include plant uptake, upward transport to the soil surface by water, transport in surface runoff water and sediment, volatilization from the soil surface, spray drift during application, and movement on wind-eroded particles. This chapter will cover triazine transport across the soil surface and through the soil profile. 

Major routes of entry of chemicals into surface waters include precipitation, drift, runoff, industrial and sewage outfalls, groundwater, and human disposal. Once in the surface waters, the chemicals may be transported via advection (bulk movement by currents), molecular diffusion (due to random thermal movement of molecules), turbulent diffusion (mixing), and dispersion. Chemicals may also be transported while adsorbed to suspended particulate matter. 

DDT may reach surface waters primarily by runoff, atmospheric transport, drift, or by direct application (e.g., to control mosquito-bome malaria). The reported half-Ufe for DDT in the water environment is 56 days in lake water and 28 days in river water. The main pathways for loss are volatilization, photodegradation, adsorption to waterborne particulates, and sedimentation. Aquatic organisms, as noted above, also readily take up and store DDT and its metabolites. 

Due to its insolubility in wateg heptachlor enters surface water primarily through run-off and drift. In water, microorganisms readily metabolize heptachlor to the epoxide. The epoxide then undergoes volatilization, adsorption to sediments, and photodegradation. These may be significant routes for disappearance of heptachlor from aquatic environments. 

A major route of contamination of surface waters by naled is spray drift and direct application for mosquito abatement. There are no data on the fate and transport of degradates containing only the organophosphate group, which form by cleavage of the P-O bond in naled and/or DDVP. 

The models chosen in FOCUSsw for estimating the different routes of entry are MACRO for estimating the contribution of drainage, PRZM for the contribution of runoff and erosion, and TOXSWA for the estimation of the final PEC in surface waters. An additional loading is defined as spray drift input. The calculation of the contribution of the spray drift is incorporated in the Graphical User Interface (GUI) for the surface water scenarios called SWASH (Surface WAter Scenario Help). This is a general software shell developed to ensure that the relevant FOCUS scenarios and input are defined consistently for all models [50]. 

Over the remainder of the region, concentrations of methane ranged from 300-500 nL/L. The small surface maximum observed near Unimak Pass arises from vertical turbulence in Unimak Pass. Near-bottom waters south of the Alaska Peninsula are enriched in methane, which becomes entrained in the northerly flow through the pass. Again, the surface concentrations of methane indicate the mean surface current drift as water moves into the Bering Sea. 

Butoxyethanol may also be directly released to surface water when excessive amounts are sprayed or drift occurs during application of herbicides that contain this compound (Dow 1993). Direct release of 2-butoxyethanol to surface water may also occur during outdoor use of consumer products that contain this chemical (e.g., liquid cleaners, varnishes, paints) however, these releases are not expected to be significant. 

In surface current systems away from the continents, Ra becomes a powerful tracer for waters that have been in contact with the continental shelf. The Ra enrichment in surface waters in the equatorial Pacific point to shelf sources off New Guinea, from where the isotope is carried eastward in the North Equatorial Counter Current. In this plume, the vertical distribution of the isotope has been used to derive vertical mixing rates. A very high accumulation of Ra is observed in the transpolar drift in the central Arctic Ocean, a signal derived from the extensive Siberian shelves. 

An area of concern with regard to 2,A-D which is commonly encountered, is the drift of 2,A-D into surface water to be used for drinking water. Table XI shows a calculation of risk involving drinking water which has begn subject to direct spray from aircraft at the rate of 20 mg/ft and, given the assumptions shown, results in a margin of safety of about 700. 

And the water seepage of upper drifts is more serious and less stable than that of lower drifts. So the threats of surface water should be prevented effectively. 

---