Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface properties sorption

Volatilization. The susceptibility of a herbicide to loss through volatilization has received much attention, due in part to the realization that herbicides in the vapor phase may be transported large distances from the point of application. Volatilization losses can be as high as 80—90% of the total applied herbicide within several days of application. The processes that control the amount of herbicide volatilized are the evaporation of the herbicide from the solution or soHd phase into the air, and dispersal and dilution of the resulting vapor into the atmosphere (250). These processes are influenced by many factors including herbicide application rate, wind velocity, temperature, soil moisture content, and the compound s sorption to soil organic and mineral surfaces. Properties of the herbicide that influence volatility include vapor pressure, water solubility, and chemical stmcture (251). [Pg.48]

Batch equilibrium tests are conducted on solid phase suspensions, prepared with previously air-dried solids, ground to uniform powdery texture for mixing with various concentrations of the pollutants of interest in solution. The concentrations of these pollutants or the COMs leachate in the solution are designed to evaluate the capability of the suspended solids to adsorb all the pollutants possible with increasing amounts of available pollutants, consistent with interaction characteristics dictated by the surface properties of the solids and the pollutants [1,16,22-26,66,67,71]. For a successful and proper study of solid particle sorption of pollutants, the requirement for complete dispersion of solid particles in solution is absolute [143 -145]. Common practice is to use a solution to solid ratio of 10 1 [1], together with efficient sample agitation at a constant temperature (e.g.,48 h at 20 °C). [Pg.197]

Bennett etal. have presented a model for gaseous pollution sorption by plants. The model includes all the known factors that might have a significant effect on pollution sorption by plant leaves, including gas concentration (ambient air and internal leaf), gas fluxes (external and internal), resistance to flow (leaf boundary layer, stomatal, and internal), nature of leaf surfaces (stomatal presence, cutin, and surface properties), importance of gas solubility and thus solute concentration within the leaf, and ability of the plant to metabolize pollutants (decontaminate itself). They mentioned the reactivity of ozone as another factor to consider. They believe that surface sorption may be important, at least over short periods. They presented a possible mathematical representation of these factors, which they suggested is equivalent to the mathematical statement of Ohm s law. This material is well int ated in the review by Bennett and Hill. ... [Pg.535]

Sorption of pharmaceuticals onto the surface of particulate matter or their distribution between two phases (water and either sludge, sediment or soil) depends on many factors, the most important being liquid phase pH and redox potential, the stereochemical structure and chemical nature of both the pharmaceutical compound and the sorbent, the lipophilicity of the sorbed molecules (excellent sorption at log Kov > 4, low sorption at log < 2.4), the sludge-water distribution coefficient Kd Kd > 2 L g SS good sorption, < 0.3 L g SS low sorption), the extent of neutral and ioiuc species present in the wastewater and the characteristics of the suspended particles. Moreover, the presence of humic and fulvic substances may alter the surface properties of the sludge, as well as the number of sites available for sorption and reactions, thereby enhancing or suppressing sorption of PhCs [38, 55, 61]. [Pg.150]

This paper is devoted to the sorption of uranyl, which exhibits a complex aqueous and surface chemistry. We review briefly the sorption behaviour of An in the environment, and illustrate the variety of environmental processes using published data of uranyl sorption in the Ban-gombe natural reactor zone. After summarizing the general findings of the mechanisms of An sorption, we then focus particularly on the current knowledge of the mechanisms of uranyl sorption. A major area of research is the influence of the aqueous uranyl speciation on the uranyl surface species. Spectroscopic data of U(VI) sorbed onto silica and alumina minerals are examined and used to discuss the role of aqueous uranyl polynuclear species, U02(0H)2 colloids and uranyl-carbonate complexes. The influence of the mineral surface properties on the mechanisms of sorption is also discussed. [Pg.546]

Hlavay and Poly k (2005) investigated the surface properties of an iron(III) hydroxide-coated alumina sorbent. Amorphous iron(III) hydroxide was coated onto a mixture of amorphous and various crystalline forms of AI2O3. The iron concentration of the sorbent was 56.1 mmol g-1. Depending on pH, batch experiments indicated that the sorbent was effective with As(V) and to some extent As(III). In a pH 5.6 solution with an ionic strength of 0.1 mmol L-1 and containing 1 mmol L-1 (75 mg As(V) L-1) of As(V), a dosage of 2.5 g sorbent 100 ml-1 of solution sorbed 0.3 mmol As(V) g-1 sorbent (22 mg As(V) g-1 sorbent). In comparison, the sorption capacity of As(III) was only about 0.06 mmol g-1 (4.5 mg As(III) g-1 sorbent) under the same conditions (Hlavay and Poly k, 2005, 76). [Pg.383]

The type of clay present in a soil influences triazine sorption (Brown and White, 1969). Furthermore, variations in surface properties among different samples of the same clay type greatly influence sorption. For instance, sorption of atrazine on 13 clay samples, of which smectite was the dominant mineral, ranged from 0% to 100% of added atrazine (Figure 21.7), and was inversely correlated to the surface charge density of the smectites (Laird et al., 1992). Such data illustrate the complexity of sorption processes and the reason why simple predictive models relying on % OC, % clay, or surface area normalizations may fail to predict accurately the sorption of triazine by a particular soil. [Pg.288]

Firstly it can be used for obtaining layers with a thickness of several mono-layers to introduce and to distribute uniformly very low amounts of admixtures. This may be important for the surface of sorption and catalytic, polymeric, metal, composition and other materials. Secondly, the production of relatively thick layers, on the order of tens of nm. In this case a thickness of nanolayers is controlled with an accuracy of one monolayer. This can be important in the optimization of layer composition and thickness (for example when kernel pigments and fillers are produced). Thirdly the ML method can be used to influence the matrix surface and nanolayer phase transformation in core-shell systems. It can be used for example for intensification of chemical solid reactions, and in sintering of ceramic powders. Fourthly, the ML method can be used for the formation of multicomponent mono- and nanolayers to create surface nanostructures with uniformly varied thicknesses (for example optical applications), or with synergistic properties (for example flame retardants), or with a combination of various functions (polyfunctional coatings). Nanoelectronics can also utilize multicomponent mono- and nanolayers. [Pg.40]

It is important to realize that useful zeolites have large internal surfaces, that is, a reminder of the sponge analogy, and it is these surfaces that control their observable surface properties. Normally, surface areas of inorganic materials are quantified by standard gas sorption techniques, for example, N2 uptake analyzed by Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) isotherm plots, and zeolites have nitrogen surface areas in the approximate region 100-1000m g. These estimates should be considered with caution because ... [Pg.5103]

The solubility of Fe(0H)2 is greater than that of Fe(0H)3 (30) and its surface properties may differ from those of Fe(0H)3. TRiTs, differences in amount and speciation of iron may have accounted for differences in phosphate sorption. [Pg.723]

Sorption of radionuclides on particulates in solution is frequently observed. The particles may be coarsely or finely dispersed. Their surface properties (surface layer, charge, ion-exchange and sorption properties) play a major role. In general, they offer a great number of sorption sites on the surfaee, and microamounts of radionuclides may be found on the surface of these particles instead of in solution. Sorption of radionuclides on colloidal particles leads to formation of radioeolloids (carrier colloids, section 13.4). [Pg.268]

Physicochemical models of partitioning at the solid-water interface, such as that used here to model ion exchange, require detailed knowledge about the particles. The surface properties of the mineral phases present, as well as equilibrium constants for ion binding to both fixed and variable charge sites associated with each phase, are required. These data requirements and the uncertainty about modeling sorption in mixtures of minerals (e.g., 48-50) make such models difficult to apply to complex natural systems. This is especially the case for modeling solute transport in soil-water systems, which... [Pg.83]

In other words, the present studies based on of the relationships of the porous stucture formation of binary systems are promising for synthesizing porous materials from components with different surface properties and sorption parameters. This allows researchers to change properties of porous materials, enhancing the useful functions and suppressing active surface sites responsible for by-processes. [Pg.86]

More thorough and comprehensive studies of multi-component porous materials will be extremely useful for synthesis of new adsorbents and catalysts with a prescribed structure and nature of the surface and sorption as well as catalytic properties. [Pg.86]


See other pages where Surface properties sorption is mentioned: [Pg.266]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.4765]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.2349]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.386]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.72 , Pg.159 ]




SEARCH



Sorption properties

© 2024 chempedia.info