Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface Kinematics

Surface roughness causes a drag on the wind expressed as a shear stress (where stress is force per unit surface area). The square root of the surface kinematic stress yjr0/p is the friction velocityg m . Dimensional arguments lead us to a logarithmic form for the wind profile such that ... [Pg.180]

The preparation of the database (especially the 3D Geometry-inclusive attributes for surfaces, kinematics, etc.) should be distributed to the departments where the data are generated. This means that every user of the IPT system is responsible for its own VR data. The know-how for generating VR data must first be taught. [Pg.2518]

For optimum combustion, the fuel should vaporize rapidly and mix intimately with the air. Even though the design of the injection system and combustion chamber play a very important role, properties such as volatility, surface tension, and fuel viscosity also affect the quality of atomization and penetration of the fuel. These considerations justify setting specifications for the density (between 0.775 and 0.840 kg/1), the distillation curve (greater than 10% distilled at 204°C, end point less than 288°C) and the kinematic viscosity (less than 8 mm /s at -20°C). [Pg.226]

Rizzuti et al. [Chem. Eng. Sci, 36, 973 (1981)] examined the influence of solvent viscosity upon the effective interfacial area in packed columns and concluded that for the systems studied the effective interfacial area a was proportional to the kinematic viscosity raised to the 0.7 power. Thus, the hydrodynamic behavior of a packed absorber is strongly affected by viscosity effects. Surface-tension effects also are important, as expressed in the work of Onda et al. (see Table 5-28-D). [Pg.624]

Figure 5.8. Kinematic yield surfaces in (a) stress space and (b) strain space. Figure 5.8. Kinematic yield surfaces in (a) stress space and (b) strain space.
RHEED is a powerful tool for studying the surface structure of crystalline samples in vacuum. Information on the surface symmetry, atomic-row spacing, and evidence of surfece roughness are contained in the RHEED pattern. The appearance of the RHEED pattern can be understood qualitatively using simple kinematic scattering theory. When used in concert with MBE, a great deal of information on film growth can be obtained. [Pg.276]

RHEED intensities cannot be explained using the kinematic theory. Dynamical scattering models of RHEED intensities are being developed. With them one will be able to obtain positions of the surface atoms within the surface unit cell. At this writing, such modeling has been done primarily for LEED. [Pg.276]

For more information on kinematic treatment of diffraction from stepped surfaces, see M. G. Lagally, D. E. Savage, and M. C. Tringides. In Reflection High-Energy Electron Difraction and Rflection Electron Ima ng of Surfaces. NATO ASI Series B, Plenum, New York, 1988, Volume 188. [Pg.277]

The situation is illustrated in Fig. 3.47. The upper part shows a thin film of Ni deposited on a Si substrate. Only particles scattered from the front surface of the Ni film have an energy given by the kinematic equation, Eq. (3.28), Fi = fCNi o- As particles traverse the solid, they lose energy along the incident path. Particles scattered from a Ni atom at the Si-Ni interface therefore have an energy smaller than On the... [Pg.142]

Having established that these assumptions are reasonable, we need to consider the relationship between the parameters of the actual offset jet and the equivalent wall jet that will produce the same (or very similar) flow far downstream of the nozzle. It can be shown that the ratio of the initial kinematic momentum per unit length of nozzle of the wall jet to the offset jet,, and the ratio of the two nozzle heights,, depend on the ratio D/B, where D is the offset distance betw een the jet nozzle and the surface of the tank, and h, is the nozzle height of the offset jet. The relationship, which because of the assumptions made in the analysis is not valid at small values of D/hj, is shown in Fig 10.72. [Pg.947]

Here, D is the diffusion constant for heat or material and the kinematic viscosity of the liquid. A consequence of the existence of such a diffusive surface barrier is that the diffusion length = D/F is to be replaced by in all formulas, as soon as growth rate V the more important become the hydrodynamic convection effects. [Pg.903]

Dynamic similarity requires geometric and kinematic similarity in addition lo force ratios at corresponding points being equal, involving properties of gravitation, surface tension, viscosity and inertia [8, 21]. With proper and careful application of this principle scale-up from test model lo large scale systems is often feasible and quite successful. Tables 5-... [Pg.313]

In the universal velocity profile a dimensionless velocity + is plotted against lnyf, where y+ is a dimensionless distance from the surface. For the region where eddy transport dominates (eddy kinematic viscosity kinematic viscosity), the ratio of the mixing length (Ag) to the distance (>>) from the surface may be taken as approximately constant and equal to 0.4. Obtain an expression for d +/dy+ in terms of y+. [Pg.866]

In the buffer zone the value of d +/dy+ is twice this value. Obtain an expression for the eddy kinematic viscosity E in terms of the kinematic viscosity (pt/p) and y+. On the assumption that the eddy thermal diffusivity Eh and the eddy kinematic viscosity E are equal, calculate the value of the temperature gradient in a liquid flowing over the surface at y =15 (which lies within the buffer layer) for a surface heat flux of 1000 W/m The liquid has a Prandtl number of 7 and a thermal conductivity of 0.62 W/m K. [Pg.866]

Dynamic viscosity Kinematic viscosity Density Surface tension Shear stress Vapor quality Contact angle Shear viscosity Shear rate... [Pg.100]

Thermal diffusivity Gradient Contact angle Kinematic viscosity Density Surface tension... [Pg.436]

Hooke, C. J. and Venner, C. H., Surface Roughness Attenuation in Line and Point Contacts," Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., PartJ J. Eng. Tribol., Vol. 214,2000, pp. 439-444. Morales-Espejel, G. E., Venner, C. H., and Greenwood, J. A., Kinematics of Transverse Real Roughness in Elastohydrody-namically Lubricated Line Contacts Using Fourier Analysis," Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., PartJ.J. Eng. Tribol.,Vol.21A, No. J6,2000, pp. 523-534. [Pg.146]

In 1996, Liu et al. [129] analyzed the wear mechanism based on the rolling kinematics of abrasive particles between the pad and wafer. They summarized that the kinetics of polishing are (1) material removal rate is dependent on the real contact area between the slurry particle and the wafer surface. The real contact area is related to the applied pressure, the curvature, and Young s modulus of the slurry... [Pg.258]

Flow of the liquid past the electrode is found in electrochemical cells where a liquid electrolyte is agitated with a stirrer or by pumping. The character of liquid flow near a solid wall depends on the flow velocity v, on the characteristic length L of the solid, and on the kinematic viscosity (which is the ratio of the usual rheological viscosity q and the liquid s density p). A convenient criterion is the dimensionless parameter Re = vLN, called the Reynolds number. The flow is laminar when this number is smaller than some critical value (which is about 10 for rough surfaces and about 10 for smooth surfaces) in this case the liquid moves in the form of layers parallel to the surface. At high Reynolds numbers (high flow velocities) the motion becomes turbulent and eddies develop at random in the flow. We shall only be concerned with laminar flow of the liquid. [Pg.63]

Figure 4. Kinematics of the solid-state EMS spectrometer [11]. (a) The polar angles made by kf and k, with respect to the incident (z) direction are Of = 14° and 6% = 76°. In (b) is shown a typical sample membrane relative to the electron trajectories. The surface sensitivity is largely determined by the escape depth of the 1.2 keV electrons ( 2 nm) and is indicated by the shaded area. [Pg.211]

The ab initio molecular dynamics study by Hudock et al. discussed above for uracil included thymine as well [126], Similarly to uracil, it was found that the first ultrafast component of the photoelectron spectra corresponds to relaxation on the S2 minimum. Subsequently a barrier exists on the S2 surface leading to the conical intersection between S2 and Si. The barrier involves out-of-plane motion of the methyl group attached to C5 in thymine or out-of-plane motion of H5 in uracil. Because of the difference of masses between these two molecules, kinematic factors will lead to a slower rate (longer lifetime) in thymine compared to uracil. Experimentally there are three components for the lifetimes of these systems, a subpicosecond, a picosecond and a nanosecond component. The picosecond component, which is suggested to correspond to the nonadiabatic S2/S1 transition, is 2.4 ps in uracil and 6.4 ps in thymine. This difference in the lifetimes could be explained by the barrier described above. [Pg.306]


See other pages where Surface Kinematics is mentioned: [Pg.447]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.1800]    [Pg.1801]    [Pg.1833]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.1725]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.928]    [Pg.947]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.702]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.208]   


SEARCH



Kinematic

© 2024 chempedia.info