Surface heterogeneity Surfaces

There are several reasons for deviations from the LHHW kinetics Surface heterogeneity, surface reconstruction, adsorbate island formation and, most important, lateral coadsorbate interactions.18,19 All these factors lead to significant deviations from the fundamental assumption of the Langmuir isotherm, i.e. constancy of AHa (and AHB) with varying coverage. 

In the selection of the stationary and mobile phase, a variety of chemical and physical factors of the chromatographic system that may contribute to the variation in the resolution and recovery of natural products need to be considered. The stationary phase contributions relate to the ligand composition, ligand density, surface heterogeneity, surface area, particle size, particle size distribution, particle compressibility, pore diameter, and pore diameter distribution. The mobile phase contributions relate to the type of organic solvents, eluent composition, ionic strength, pH, temperature, loading concentration, and volume. 

SHEED Scanning high-energy electron diffraction [106] Scanning version of HEED Surface heterogeneity... 

The importance of the solid-liquid interface in a host of applications has led to extensive study over the past 50 years. Certainly, the study of the solid-liquid interface is no easier than that of the solid-gas interface, and all the complexities noted in Section VIM are present. The surface structural and spectroscopic techniques presented in Chapter VIII are not generally applicable to liquids (note, however. Ref. 1). There is, perforce, some retreat to phenomenology, empirical rules, and semiempirical models. The central importance of the Young equation is evident even in its modification to treat surface heterogeneity or roughness. ... 

A somewhat subtle point of difficulty is the following. Adsorption isotherms are quite often entirely reversible in that adsorption and desorption curves are identical. On the other hand, the solid will not generally be an equilibrium crystal and, in fact, will often have quite a heterogeneous surface. The quantities ys and ysv are therefore not very well defined as separate quantities. It seems preferable to regard t, which is well defined in the case of reversible adsorption, as simply the change in interfacial free energy and to leave its further identification to treatments accepted as modelistic. 

In general, one should allow for nonideality in the adsorbed phase (as well as in solution), and various authors have developed this topic [5,137,145-149]. Also, the adsorbent surface may be heterogeneous, and Sircar [150] has pointed out that a given set of data may equally well be represented by nonideality of the adsorbed layer on a uniform surface or by an ideal adsorbed layer on a heterogeneous surface. 

Surface heterogeneity may be inferred from emission studies such as those studies by de Schrijver and co-workers on P and on R adsorbed on clay minerals [197,198]. In the case of adsorbed pyrene and its derivatives, there is considerable evidence for surface mobility (on clays, metal oxides, sulfides), as from the work of Thomas [199], de Mayo and co-workers [200], Singer [201] and Stahlberg et al. [202]. There has also been evidence for ground-state bimolecular association of adsorbed pyrene [66,203]. The sensitivity of pyrene to the polarity of its environment allows its use as a probe of surface polarity [204,205]. Pyrene or ofter emitters may be used as probes to study the structure of an adsorbate film, as in the case of Triton X-100 on silica [206], sodium dodecyl sulfate at the alumina surface [207] and hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride adsorbed onto silver electrodes from water and dimethylformamide [208]. In all cases progressive structural changes were concluded to occur with increasing surfactant adsorption. 

Bowden and Tabor [24] proposed, for such heterogeneous surfaces, that... 

Finally, in the case of solids, there is the difficulty that surface atoms and molecules differ in their properties from one location to another. The discussion in Section VII-4 made clear the variety of surface heterogeneities possible in the case of a solid. Those measurements that depend on the state of surface atoms or molecules will generally be influenced differently by such heterogeneities. Different methods of measuring surface area will thus often not only give different absolute values, but may also give different relative values for a series of solids. 

The first term on the right is the common inverse cube law, the second is taken to be the empirically more important form for moderate film thickness (and also conforms to the polarization model, Section XVII-7C), and the last term allows for structural perturbation in the adsorbed film relative to bulk liquid adsorbate. In effect, the vapor pressure of a thin multilayer film is taken to be P and to relax toward P as the film thickens. The equation has been useful in relating adsorption isotherms to contact angle behavior (see Section X-7). Roy and Halsey [73] have used a similar equation earlier, Halsey [74] allowed for surface heterogeneity by assuming a distribution of Uq values in Eq. XVII-79. Dubinin s equation (Eq. XVII-75) has been mentioned another variant has been used by Bonnetain and co-workers [7S]. 

The question is not trivial such agreement is not assured in the case of systems showing hysteresis (see Section XVII-16), and it has been difficult to affirm it on rigorous thermodynamic grounds in the case of a heterogeneous surface. 

Brunauer (see Refs. 136-138) defended these defects as deliberate approximations needed to obtain a practical two-constant equation. The assumption of a constant heat of adsorption in the first layer represents a balance between the effects of surface heterogeneity and of lateral interaction, and the assumption of a constant instead of a decreasing heat of adsorption for the succeeding layers balances the overestimate of the entropy of adsorption. These comments do help to explain why the model works as well as it does. However, since these approximations are inherent in the treatment, one can see why the BET model does not lend itself readily to any detailed insight into the real physical nature of multilayers. In summary, the BET equation will undoubtedly maintain its usefulness in surface area determinations, and it does provide some physical information about the nature of the adsorbed film, but only at the level of approximation inherent in the model. Mainly, the c value provides an estimate of the first layer heat of adsorption, averaged over the region of fit. 

On the other hand, as applied to the submonolayer region, the same comment can be made as for the localized model. That is, the two-dimensional non-ideal-gas equation of state is a perfectly acceptable concept, but one that, in practice, is remarkably difficult to distinguish from the localized adsorption picture. If there can be even a small amount of surface heterogeneity the distinction becomes virtually impossible (see Section XVll-14). Even the cases of phase change are susceptible to explanation on either basis. 

The analysis is thus relatively exact for heterogeneous surfaces and is especially valuable for analyzing changes in an adsorbent following one or another treatment. An example is shown in Fig. XVII-24 [160]. This type of application has also been made to carbon blacks and silica-alumina catalysts [106a]. House and Jaycock [161] compared the Ross-Olivier [55] and Adamson-Ling... 

It is generally assumed that isosteric thermodynamic heats obtained for a heterogeneous surface retain their simple relationship to calorimetric heats (Eq. XVII-124), although it may be necessary in a thermodynamic proof of this to assume that the chemical potential of the adsorbate does not show discontinu-... 

Most calculations of f(Q) for a heterogeneous surface, using an adsorption isotherm assume a patchwise distribution of sites. Explain for what kind of local isotherm functions,/((2,P, T) this assumption is not necessary, and for which it is necessary. Give examples. 

As a simple model of a heterogeneous surface, assume that 20% of it consists of sites of Q= 2.5 kcal/mol 45% of sites Q = 3.5 kcal/mol and the remainder, of sites of Q= 4.5 kcal/mol. Calculate Q(P, T) for nitrogen at 77 K and at 90 K, assuming the adsorption to follow the Langmuir equation with bo given by Eq. XVII-15. Calculate qsi for several 6 values and compare the result with the assumed integral distribution hinction. 

Discuss physical situations in which it might be possible to observe a vertical step in the adsorption isotherm of a gas on a heterogeneous surface. 

Surface heterogeneity may merely be a reflection of different types of chemisorption and chemisorption sites, as in the examples of Figs. XVIII-9 and XVIII-10. The presence of various crystal planes, as in powders, leads to heterogeneous adsorption behavior the effect may vary with particle size, as in the case of O2 on Pd [107]. Heterogeneity may be deliberate many catalysts consist of combinations of active surfaces, such as bimetallic alloys. In this last case, the surface properties may be intermediate between those of the pure metals (but one component may be in surface excess as with any solution) or they may be distinctly different. In this last case, one speaks of various effects ensemble, dilution, ligand, and kinetic (see Ref. 108 for details). 

---