Heterogeneous catalytic reactions surface complex, formation

The principles of homogeneous reaction kinetics and the equations derived there remain valid for the kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions, provided that the concentrations and temperatures substituted in the equations are really those prevailing at the point of reaction. The formation of a surface complex is an essential feature of reactions catalyzed by solids and the kinetic equation must account for this. In addition, transport processes may influence the overall rate heat and mass transfer between the fluid and the solid or inside the porous solid, > that the conditions over the local reation site do not correspond to those in the bulk fluid around the catalyst particle. Figure 2.1-1 shows the seven steps involved when a molecule moves into the catalyst, reacts, and the product moves back to the bulk fluid stream. To simplify the notation the index s, referring to concentrations inside the solid, will be dropped in this chapter. 

With the advent of synthetic methods to produce more advanced model systems (cluster- or nanoparticle-based systems either in the gas phase or on planar surfaces), we come to the modern age of surface chemistry and heterogeneous catalysis. Castleman and coworkers demonstrate the large influence that charge, size, and composition of metal oxide clusters generated in the gas phase can have on the mechanism of a catalytic reaction. Rupprechter (Chap. 15) reports on the stmctural and catalytic properties of planar noble metal nanocrystals on thin oxide support films in vacuum and under high-pressure conditions. The theme of model systems of nanoparticles supported on planar metal oxide substrates is continued with a chapter on the formation of planar catalyst based on size-selected cluster deposition methods. In a second contribution from Rupprecther (Chap. 17), the complexities of surface chemistry and heterogeneous catalysis on metal oxide films and nanostructures, where the extension of the bulk structure to the surface often does not occur and the surface chemistry is often dominated by surface defects, are discussed. 

Mercury is a classical test to identify heterogeneous catalysts (bulk metal or colloids) due to its ability to poison metal(O) heterogeneous catalysts by formation of amalgam or adsorption on the metal surface [23]. If the catalytic activity remains unaffected when mercury is present, this fact represents an evidence for a homogeneous catalyst. But mercury can induce side reactions [23c] and also react with some molecular complexes [23c,24]. Consequently, the results obtained with mercury are not enough to conclude about the catalyst nature. From a practical point of view, it is important to use a large excess of Hg(0) with respect to the catalyst to favour the contact with it. 

Heterogeneous catalysis has to deal not only with the catalyzed reaction itself but, in addition, with the complexities of surface properties (different crystal surfaces, different catalytic sites), possible segregation of adsorbates (so-called island formation), contamination or deterioration of catalytic sites, and adsorption and desorption equilibria and rates. Moreover, mass transfer to and from the reaction site is a factor more often than in homogeneous catalysis. In practice, these complications may affect behavior more profoundly than does the kinetics of the surface reaction itself. A practical and balanced kinetic treatment therefore uses simplifications and approximations much more generously than was done in the preceding chapters. Excellent textbooks on the subject are available [G1-G7], so coverage here can remain restricted to a critical overview and indications showing when and how concepts and methods developed in the earlier chapters can be useful. 

---