Surface sites, heterogeneous

General Observations About x. its Relationship to the Overall Partitioning Coefficient and to the Concept of Surface-Site Heterogeneity. One approach to metal/particle surface interactions which has been developed, historically, in a variety of forms, is a conceptual model that assumes only two conditions for surface sites occupied by an adsorbate or unoccupied. In applying this approach to the solid/aqueous solution interface, the adsorption... 

In their description of metal ion adsorption, Benjamin and Leckie used an apparent adsorption reaction which included a generic relationship between the removal of a metal ion from solution and the release of protons. The macroscopic proton coefficient was given a constant value, suggesting that x was uniform for all site types and all intensities of metal ion/oxide surface site interaction. Because the numerical value of x is a fundamental part of the determination of K, discussions of surface site heterogeneity, which are formulated in terms similar to Equation 4, cannot be decoupled from observations of the response of x to pH and adsorption density. As will be discussed later, It is not the general concept of surface-site heterogeneity which is affected by what is known of x> instead, it is the specific details of the relationship between K, pH and T which is altered. 

Macroscopic Coefficients and Surface-Site Heterogeneity. Beniamin and heckles model (5) of heterogeneous metal oxide surface sites includes two observations of metal ion/surface site Interactions. 

Applications of the heat of immersion technique to determinations of polarity of surfaces, site heterogeneities, wetting of surfactants, hydrophilicity, and the interaction of specific groups from solution with solids are on the increase. The technique is certain to provide new and valuable information about the solid-liquid interface in the near future. 

Surface site heterogeneity of Ru/Si02 for ammonia synthesis, as well as the effect of K promotion, has been studied using SSITKA.K is a well known activity promoter for ammonia synthesis on Ru and Fe catalysts. The Ru/Si02 catalyst was studied at 673 K, 204 kPa, H2/N2 ratio of 3 and GHSV between 5000-23000. SSITKA experiments were carried out by switching between N2 and N2. 

Catalysis in a single fluid phase (liquid, gas or supercritical fluid) is called homogeneous catalysis because the phase in which it occurs is relatively unifonn or homogeneous. The catalyst may be molecular or ionic. Catalysis at an interface (usually a solid surface) is called heterogeneous catalysis, an implication of this tenn is that more than one phase is present in the reactor, and the reactants are usually concentrated in a fluid phase in contact with the catalyst, e.g., a gas in contact with a solid. Most catalysts used in the largest teclmological processes are solids. The tenn catalytic site (or active site) describes the groups on the surface to which reactants bond for catalysis to occur the identities of the catalytic sites are often unknown because most solid surfaces are nonunifonn in stmcture and composition and difficult to characterize well, and the active sites often constitute a small minority of the surface sites. 

Of these, the most extensive use is to identify adsorbed molecules and molecular intermediates on metal single-crystal surfaces. On these well-defined surfaces, a wealth of information can be gained about adlayers, including the nature of the surface chemical bond, molecular structural determination and geometrical orientation, evidence for surface-site specificity, and lateral (adsorbate-adsorbate) interactions. Adsorption and reaction processes in model studies relevant to heterogeneous catalysis, materials science, electrochemistry, and microelectronics device failure and fabrication have been studied by this technique. 

In cases of spillover in heterogeneous catalysis the usual kinetic models can no longer be applied in a direct way. The creation of new surface sites or... 

Steps 1 through 9 constitute a model for heterogeneous catalysis in a fixed-bed reactor. There are many variations, particularly for Steps 4 through 6. For example, the Eley-Rideal mechanism described in Problem 10.4 envisions an adsorbed molecule reacting directly with a molecule in the gas phase. Other models contemplate a mixture of surface sites that can have different catalytic activity. For example, the platinum and the alumina used for hydrocarbon reforming may catalyze different reactions. Alternative models lead to rate expressions that differ in the details, but the functional forms for the rate expressions are usually similar. 

In catalysis active sites are operative that allow for an alternative reaction path. For a satisfactory catalyst this alternative pathway leads to higher rates and higher selectivity. In heterogeneous catalysis reactant molecules adsorb at active sites on the catalyst surface at the surface sites reactions occur and products are desorbed subsequently. After desorption, active sites are again available for reactant molecules and the cycle is closed. In homogeneous catalysis the situation is essentially identical. Here complexation and decomplexation occur. A complication in heterogeneous catalysis is the need for mass transfer into and out of the catalyst particle, which is usually porous with the major part of the active sites at the interior surface. 

For a molecule characterised by a AH value of 40 k.I mol 1 and undergoing facile surface diffusion, i.e. a A/ dir value close to zero, then each molecule will visit, during its surface lifetime (10 r s), approximately 107 surface sites. Since the surface concentration a is given by a = NtSUIf, then for a AH value of 40 kJ mol-1 and zsurf= 10-6 s at 295 K, the value of a is 109 molecules cm-2. These model calculations are illustrative but it is obvious that no conventional spectroscopic method is available that could monitor molecules present at a concentration 10-6 monolayers. These molecules may, however, contribute, if highly reactive, to the mechanism of a heterogeneously catalysed reaction we shall return to this important concept in discussing the role of transient states in catalytic reactions. 

In principle, sites a, IT, and c need not be association sites as depicted by Ogston but could be steric sites that form obstructions such that the adsorbed molecule is chirally directed. Only one active site is actually required providing the remaining two sites (protuberances or cavities) are different from each other and from the active site that catalyzes the reaction. They could be identical providing they are not symmetrically oriented with respect to the active site (not an isosceles triangle). These are the basic concepts for a chiral environment on a surface and they lead to the three basic methods for creating chiral surfaces in heterogeneous catalysis. 

Moreover, the use of heat-flow calorimetry in heterogeneous catalysis research is not limited to the measurement of differential heats of adsorption. Surface interactions between adsorbed species or between gases and adsorbed species, similar to the interactions which either constitute some of the steps of the reaction mechanisms or produce, during the catalytic reaction, the inhibition of the catalyst, may also be studied by this experimental technique. The calorimetric results, compared to thermodynamic data in thermochemical cycles, yield, in the favorable cases, useful information concerning the most probable reaction mechanisms or the fraction of the energy spectrum of surface sites which is really active during the catalytic reaction. Some of the conclusions of these investigations may be controlled directly by the calorimetric studies of the catalytic reaction itself. 

In surface-complexation models, the relationship between the proton and metal/surface-site complexes is explicitly defined in the formulation of the proposed (but hypothetical) microscopic subreactions. In contrast, in macroscopic models, the relationship between solute adsorption and the overall proton activity is chemically less direct there is no information given about the source of the proton other than a generic relationship between adsorption and changes in proton activity. The macroscopic solute adsorption/pH relationships correspond to the net proton release or consumption from all chemical interactions involved in proton tranfer. Since it is not possible to account for all of these contributions directly for many heterogeneous systems of interest, the objective of the macroscopic models is to establish and calibrate overall partitioning coefficients with respect to observed system variables. 

---