Surface heterogeneity patchwise

The effects due to the finite size of crystallites (in both lateral directions) and the resulting effects due to boundary fields have been studied by Patrykiejew [57], with help of Monte Carlo simulation. A solid surface has been modeled as a collection of finite, two-dimensional, homogeneous regions and each region has been assumed to be a square lattice of the size Lx L (measured in lattice constants). Patches of different size contribute to the total surface with different weights described by a certain size distribution function C L). Following the basic assumption of the patchwise model of surface heterogeneity [6], the patches have been assumed to be independent one of another. 

As a trend, adsorbates tend to be mobile at high temperature and localized at low temperature. Between these limits there will be transitional states that are difficult to handle because the issue of surface heterogeneity also has to be considered. Whether or not an adsorbed molecule can move laterally depends on the activation energy of such displacements, a. The fraction that can move is proportional to exp(-a/RT). It is likely that there will be a certain distribution of a over the surface. Because of the exponential dependence, and because the distribution of the parts with low a (patchwise or homogeneous at the site level) also plays an important role, predictions with some general applicability are virtually impossible, as work by Jaronlec et al. has indicated. 

The analysis we have dealt with in Sections 11.4 and 11.5 are applicable to energetic homogeneous surfaces. In reality, pores are heterogeneous and it should be considered in the modeling. The surface heterogeneity is modeled either by a periodic spatial variation of the solid—fluid potential [91—93], or in the framework of a patchwise model [94—96]. The latter is more general, and is often considered in the literature. 

Here, we mention only the precursory results obtained by Nicholson and Silvester [103] for adsorption on the surface with random and patchwise surface topographies. This work led to the conclusion that the smooth sigmoid isotherms are not necessarily associated with surface heterogeneity nor are stepped isotherms indicative of homogeneous surfaces. Nicolson and... 

Most calculations of f(Q) for a heterogeneous surface, using an adsorption isotherm assume a patchwise distribution of sites. Explain for what kind of local isotherm functions,/((2,P, T) this assumption is not necessary, and for which it is necessary. Give examples. 

Fig. 6a-d. Schematic view of adsorption from solution onto smooth, planar surfaces where the surface sites are considered to have the same area as the projected area of the solute of interest, a. Top, the ideal (Langmuir) case b. clustering of adsorbed solute due to attractive lateral interactions or positive cooperativity c. heterogeneous surface, i.e., two sets of binding sites d. patchwise heterogeneity or surface domains of different adsorptive properties... 

Most solid surface are also chemically inhomogeneous. Cassie considered a smooth but chemically patchwise heterogeneous surface. If there are two different kinds of region with... 

Thorn, L.H. et al., Polymer adsorption on a patchwise heterogeneous surface, Progr. 

In general the desorption kinetics from patchwise heterogeneous surfaces are given by ... 

The work carried out in [5,62 66] allows the direct extension of the adsorption isotherms developed in the previous section to heterogeneous surfaces. Here, for simplicity, we restrict our study to extend only the adsorption isotherm (57) with n = 1 and za = 0 to random and patchwise surfaces. 

Here, K denotes the r.h.s. of Eq. (79) and A = Uo/kT is an heterogeneity factor which increases with increasing heterogeneity of the adsorbing surface. Homogeneous surfaces correspond to A = 0. At patchwise surfaces Eq. (80) should be solved numerically with respect to 0, and the total adsorption isotherm is determined again numerically from Eqs. (81) and (82). 

Figure 10. Adsorption isotherms on random (—) and patchwise (---) heterogeneous surfaces...

The present treatment is restricted to non interacting patchwise heterogeneity and random heterogeneity. The first part of this section is concerned with the theory of monocomponent ion adsorption on heterogeneous surfaces, the second part with multicomponent ion adsorption. 

The overall proton adsorption from an indifferent electrolyte solution on a heterogeneous surface can simply be described as the sum of the local adsorption contributions. The effect of lateral interactions should be taken into account in the local isotherm. For a patchwise surface with a discrete distribution of intrinsic affinity constants the total... 

Prediction of double layer parameters is available. Such calculations are very useful to obtain theoretical insight in he behaviour of patchwise heterogeneous surfaces. Some examples of this type of calculations can be found in refs. [32,101,102]. 

Gibb, A.W.M. and Koopal, L.K., Electrochemistry of a model for patchwise heterogeneous surfaces The rutile-hematite system, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 134, 122, 1990. 

The function x(s) refers to the total energetic heterogeneity of an adsorbent, and provides no information about the topography of energetic centers on a surface. Similarly, A is a global characteristic of the adsorbent, i.e. it does not refer to any specific site on the surface. However, in the case of a patchwise topography, it is... 

Fig. 6 Electroosmotic flow streamlines over a patchwise heterogeneous surface pattern with Oj,omo =...

To deal with the heterogeneity, we assume that the surface has a patchwise topography, that is sites of the same energy of interaction with the adsorbate are grouped together in the same patch. The local isotherm on each patch is assumed to... 

---