Supervision Assessment

Opioid Treatment Program Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) certified program, usually comprising a facility, staff, administration, patients, and services that engages in supervised assessment and treatment, using methadone, buprenorphine, L-a-acetylmethadol (LAAM), or naltrexone, of individuals who are addicted to opioids. 

Unit cost data should be carefully assessed to ensure that process type, size, and raw materials are similar to the proposed venture. Operating cost data sometimes are reported for separate categories such as operating labor, maintenance labor, supervision, and utiHties (9). 

In the United Kingdom, the Health and Safety at Work Act (1974) and regulations made under it require occupiers to provide a safe plant and system of work and adequate instruction, training, and supervision. In the European community, occupiers of major hazard sites are required to produce a safety case, which describes how hazards have been assessed and are kept under control. Many other countries have similar legislation, though standards of enforcement vary. 

The psychomotor domain involves learning physical skills (such as injection of insulin) or tasks (such as performing a dressing change). The nurse teaches a task or skill using a step-by-step method. The patient is allowed hands-on practice under die supervision of the nurse. The nurse assesses die patient mastery of the skill by having the patient or caregiver perform a return demonstration under the watchful eye of the nurse ... 

The European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances (EUSES) [8] is the software provided by European Chemical Bureau (ECB) to implement the EU Technical Guidance Documents on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, existing substances, and biocides [3]. The development of EUSES 2.1 was commissioned by the European Commission to the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) of the Netherlands. The work was supervised by an EU working group comprised of representatives of the JRC-European Chemicals Bureau, EU Member States, and the European chemical industry. 

The need for special facilities for work involving neutron activation analysis and radiochemical measurements has been referred to above in Section 4.3.6. Other safety factors may also influence your choice of method. For example, you may wish to avoid the use of methods which require toxic solvents, such as benzene and certain chlorinated hydrocarbons, or toxic reagents, such as potassium cyanide, if alternative procedures are available. Where Statutory Methods have to be used, there may be no alternative. In such cases, it is essential that staff are fully aware of the hazards involved and are properly supervised. Whatever method is used, the appropriate safety assessment must be carried out before the work is started. Procedures should be in place to ensure that the required safety protocols are followed and that everyone is aware of legislative requirements. 

Contamination assessment of an injured individual should be performed by a trained health professional under the supervision of on-the-scene medical personnel. This assessment should include collecting radiation and chemical agent measurements using instrumentation identified in Section 6.12, nasal wipes, and collection of saliva, blood, and other samples for laboratory testing. The distribution of contamination and locations of wounds on the body should be recorded. 

All methods should be carried out only by competent persons and with adequate supervision when necessary. All obligations under The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 1999 (COSHH), should be observed, and risk-assessment documentation completed. Appropriate personal protective equipment should be provided and worn whenever recommended. Persons carrying out the procedures in this manual do so entirely at their own risk, and neither the author, publishers, or anyone mentioned in, or connected with this publication can be held in any way responsible for any accidents no matter how caused. 

Chen et al. (2008) employed a commercial electronic tongue, based on an array of seven sensors, to classify 80 green tea samples on the basis of their taste grade, which is usually assessed by a panel test. PCA was employed as an explorative tool, while fc-NN and a back propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN) were used for supervised classification. Both the techniques provide excellent results, achieving 100% prediction ability on a test set composed of 40 samples (one-half of the total number). In cases like this, when a simple technique, such as fc-NN, is able to supply excellent outcomes, the utilization of a complex technique, like BP-ANN, does not appear justified from a practical point of view. 

Medical assessment of the injured victims was headed by an experienced surgeon, Head of the Surgical Department of Emergency Surgery. Doctors of all specialties were involved with medical assessment. Every injured patient was personally supervised by an assigned doctor starting from the time when the patient was admitted to the operating theatre. 

Route of administration Rebif is intended for subcutaneous injection. Appropriate instruction for self-injection or injection by a caregiver should be provided. If a patient is to self-administer Rebif, the ability of that patient to self-administer and properly dispose of syringes should be assessed. The initial injection should be performed under supervision. Patients should be advised of the importance of rotating sites of injection with each dose, to minimize the likelihood of severe injection reactions or necrosis. 

---