Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Substrate enhancement

Chiral Controller. (Synonymous with Chiral Auxiliary). A chiral structural unit which when attached to a substrate enhances stereoselectivity in the formation of new stereocenter(s). [Pg.96]

The organofunctional group (R) in the coupling agent causes the reaction with the polymer. This could be a copolymerization and/or the formation of an interpenetrating network. This curing reaction of a silane-treated substrate enhances the wetting by the resin (Table 9). [Pg.798]

The presence of ascorbic acid as a co-substrate enhanced the rate of the Ru(EDTA)-catalyzed autoxidation in the order cyclohexane < cyclohexanol < cyclohexene (148). The reactions were always first-order in [H2A]. It was concluded that these reactions occur via a Ru(EDTA)(H2A)(S)(02) adduct, in which ascorbic acid promotes the cleavage of the 02 unit and, as a consequence, O-transfer to the substrate. While the model seems to be consistent with the experimental observations, it leaves open some very intriguing questions. According to earlier results from the same laboratory (24,25), the Ru(EDTA) catalyzed autoxidation of ascorbic acid occurs at a comparable or even a faster rate than the reactions listed in Table III. It follows, that the interference from this side reaction should not be neglected in the detailed kinetic model, in particular because ascorbic acid may be completely consumed before the oxidation of the other substrate takes place. [Pg.446]

The catalytic significance of Fig. 9.12 is that it represents the differences in the effective work functions that a molecule experiences upon adsorption at different positions on the surface. As explained in the Appendix, a low work function of the substrate enhances the capability of the substrate to donate electrons into empty chemisorption orbitals of the adsorbate. If such an orbital is antibonding with respect to an intramolecular bond of the adsorbed molecule, the latter is weakened due to a higher electron occupation. [Pg.264]

Qu, L. and L. Dai, Substrate-enhanced electroless deposition of metal nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2005.127(31) p. 10806-10807. [Pg.167]

The yield of HAs in food systems is affected by the concentration of substrates, enhancers and inhibitors, duration and temperature of heating, water activity, and pH. Some HAs are formed in mixtures of substrates heated for several weeks at relatively low temperature, about 37 to 60°C at 150 to 200°C the rate of reaction is much higher. However, in model systems prolonged heating may also bring about a decrease of the concentration of some HAs. Low water activity in the surface layers of the heated products favors the formation of HAs. In presence of lipids, Fe, and Fe, the rate of reaction increases, probably due to oxidation and generation of radicals (Jagerstad et ah, 2000). [Pg.295]

Anaerobic metabolism occnrs nnder conditions in which the diffusion rate is insufficient to meet the microbial demand, and alternative electron acceptors are needed. The type of anaerobic microbial reaction controls the redox potential (Eh), the denitrification process, reduction of Mu and SO , and the transformation of selenium and arsenate. Keeney (1983) emphasized that denitrification is the most significant anaerobic reaction occurring in the subsurface. Denitrification may be defined as the process in which N-oxides serve as terminal electron acceptors for respiratory electron transport (Firestone 1982), because nitrification and NOj" reduction to produce gaseous N-oxides. hi this case, a reduced electron-donating substrate enhances the formation of more N-oxides through numerous elechocarriers. Anaerobic conditions also lead to the transformation of organic toxic compounds (e.g., DDT) in many cases, these transformations are more rapid than under aerobic conditions. [Pg.305]

Additional information <1> (<1> 35% ammonium sulfate, AMP or other substrates enhance thermal stability [1]) [1]... [Pg.570]

The pn-junction formed between the photo-conductive detector and the substrate enhances the photo-conductive signal by essentially isolating the photogenerated minority carriers in the photo-conductive detector from the majority carriers. The minority carriers are swept across the junction while the majority carriers are allowed to flow in the photoconductive detector. This inhibits the recombination rate and extends the lifetime of the majority carriers. [Pg.143]

For example, an ink may contain a mixture of cyclohexanone with an evaporation rate of 0.2 and butoxyethanol (Butyl Cellosolve) with an evaporation rate of 0.07. Additional factors to take into account when choosing the solvents are the interaction of the solvent with the substrate, e.g., swelling of polymeric substrates enhances adhesion. Surface tension will influence print quality and dot gain with high surface tension solvents leading to smaller drops. [Pg.155]

Painter and Morgan used poly(styrenesulfonic acid) 2 as catalyst for the selective hydrolysis of polysaccharides (JS). The pdymer add was up to twenty to thirty times more effective than hydrochloric acid in the case of polysaccharides containing free amino groups, but it was 30% less effective for the hydrolysis of unsubstituted starch 26. Obviously, the electrostatic attraction between the polymer and substrate enhanced the catalytic activity. More recently, Tal da reported that amydose sulfate catalyzed the hydrolysis of sucrose 74 times mote efficiently than sulfuric acid (39). [Pg.174]

What is surprising is that platinum nanoparticle arrays with similar mean partiele diameters still exhibited very different SFG intenities (752). For example, for 40-nm platinum particle arrays, the enhancement for ssp polarization was the relatively small value of approximately 4200 (whereas for 45-nm platinum articles it was approximately 11 800). Indeed, the calculations suggested the same enhaneement for these particle sizes. For 6-nm platinum partieles evaporated onto Si02, the calculations suggest a plasmon enhaneement of 28 and a substrate enhancement of 76, yielding a total enhaneement of approximately 2100 for ssp. However, an... [Pg.209]

Results indicate that deposition is facilitated on active (copper, NijCr) compared to inert substrates. This is attributed to an easier decomposition of the precursor on copper or NijCr rather than on glass or carbon surfaces. Hydrogen can be dissociatively adsorbed on NijCr substrates enhancing the decomposition of NiCp. On copper substrates, the dissociative adsorption of hydrogen is not easy. In that case, the enhanced nucleation is certainly due to the... [Pg.302]

Hess TF, Schmidt SK, Silverstein J, et al. 1990. Supplemental substrate enhancement of 2,4-dinitrophenol mineralization by bacterial consortium. Appl Environ Microbiol 56 1551-1558. [Pg.215]

Not all enzyme interactions are competitive. One cooperative enzyme reaction takes place when a substrate primes an enzyme with multiple reactive sites to accept additional substrate molecules. Thus, the presence of substrate enhances the enzyme and makes it more effective. [Pg.137]

Cu + (Cu (N03)2/Cu, +0.340 V vs. SHE) nor Ag+ (Ag(NH3) +/Ag, +0.373 V vs. SHE) can be reduced without the presence of a reducing agent (Choi et al. 2002). This problan was solved by placing the nanotubes on a metal substrate with a redox potential lower than that for the metal ions. With this method, ions can be reduced into nanoparticles onto the CNT surface even if their redox potential is lower than that of the CNTs. This method is referred to as substrate enhanced electroless deposition (Qu and Dai 2005). [Pg.493]

Therefore, in biphasic systems the partition coefficient (a thermodynamic dimension) and the mass-transfer coefficient (a kinetic dimension) will dominate the cat of the enzyme. As a consequence, the overall reaction rate is mainly determined by the physical properties of the system (such as solubilities and stirring) and rally to a lesser extent by the enzyme s catalytic power. In other words, the enzyme could work faster, but is unable to get enough substrate. Enhanced agitatirai (stirring, shaking) would improve the mass transfer but, on the other hand, it increasingly leads to deactivation of the enzyme due to mechanical shear and chemical stress. [Pg.318]

G., Vaysset, A., Geaymond, O., and Pasturel, A. (2010) Substrate-enhanced supercooling in AuSi eutectic droplets. Nature, 464, 1174-1177. [Pg.538]

Valentini, R., Vargo, T., Gardella, J., and Aebischer, P, Electrically charged polymeric. substrates enhance nerve fibre outgrowth in vitro. Biomaterials, 13, 183-190 (1992). [Pg.1048]


See other pages where Substrate enhancement is mentioned: [Pg.160]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.584]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.6729]    [Pg.1120]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.2453]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.595]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.236 , Pg.237 , Pg.238 ]




SEARCH



Enhancing substrate

© 2024 chempedia.info