Stress relationship with strain

Influence of Solvents. The stress-strain curves of untreated and ether-extracted corneum in water show marked differences (81). Untreated corneum, extended 5% and relaxed, shows hysteresis similar to that observed for other keratinaceous structures (Figure 35). The deformation mechanism is completely reversible, and hydrogen-bond breakdown and slow reformation may be the major factors determining the stress-strain relationships. With ether-extracted samples, complete recovery is observed from 5% extension but with little or no hysteresis. The more rapid swelling and lack of hysteresis of ether-extracted corneum in water may be related to the breakdown of hydrogen bonds normally shielded from the eflFects of water by the lipid-like materials removed by ether. 

Fig. 1 Linear-nonlinear transition of stress strain relationship with respect to different time levels [16]...

By combining random flight statistics from Chap. 1 with the statistical definition of entropy from the last section, we shall be able to develop a molecular model for the stress-strain relationship in a cross-linked network. It turns out to be more convenient to work with the ratio of stretched to unstretched lengths L/Lq than with y itself. Note the relationship between these variables ... 

By analogy with Eq. (3.1), we seek a description for the relationship between stress and strain. The former is the shearing force per unit area, which we symbolize as as in Chap. 2. For shear strain we use the symbol y it is the rate of change of 7 that is involved in the definition of viscosity in Eq. (2.2). As in the analysis of tensile deformation, we write the strain AL/L, but this time AL is in the direction of the force, while L is at right angles to it. These quantities are shown in Fig. 3.6. It is convenient to describe the sample deformation in terms of the angle 6, also shown in Fig. 3.6. For distortion which is independent of time we continue to consider only the equilibrium behavior-stress and strain are proportional with proportionality constant G ... 

The Stress-Rang e Concept. The solution of the problem of the rigid system is based on the linear relationship between stress and strain. This relationship allows the superposition of the effects of many iadividual forces and moments. If the relationship between stress and strain is nonlinear, an elementary problem, such as a siagle-plane two-member system, can be solved but only with considerable difficulty. Most practical piping systems do, ia fact, have stresses that are initially ia the nonlinear range. Using linear analysis ia an apparendy nonlinear problem is justified by the stress-range concept... 

The stress—strain relationship is used in conjunction with the rules for determining the stress and strain components with respect to some angle 9 relative to the fiber direction to obtain the stress—strain relationship for a lamina loaded under plane strain conditions where the fibers are at an angle 9 to the loading axis. When the material axes and loading axes are not coincident, then coupling between shear and extension occurs and... 

Since these assumptions are not always justifiable when applied to plastics, the classic equations cannot be used indiscriminately. Each case must be considered on its merits, with account being taken of such factors as the time under load, the mode of deformation, the service conditions, the fabrication method, the environment, and others. In particular, it should be noted that the traditional equations are derived using the relationship that stress equals modulus times strain, where the modulus is a constant. From the review in Chapter 2 it should be clear that the modulus of a plastic is generally not a constant. Several approaches have been used to allow for this condition. The drawback is that these methods can be quite complex, involving numerical techniques that are not attractive to designers. However, one method has been widely accepted, the so-called pseudo-elastic design method. 

Viscoelasticity A combination of viscous and elastic properties in a plastic with the relative contribution of each being dependent on time, temperature, stress, and strain rate. It relates to the mechanical behavior of plastics in which there is a time and temperature dependent relationship between stress and strain. A material having this property is considered to combine the features of a perfectly elastic solid and a perfect fluid. 

The decrease in the fiber diameter of fabric resulted in a decrease in porosity and pore size, but an increase in fiber density and mechanical strength. The microfiber fabric made of PCLA (1 1 mole ratio) was elastomeric with a low Young s modulus and an almost linear stress-strain relationship under the maximal stain (500%) in this measurement. 

Considerably better agreement with the observed stress-strain relationships has been obtained through the use of empirical equations first proposed by Mooney and subsequently generalized by Rivlin. The latter showed, solely on the basis of required symmetry conditions and independently of any hypothesis as to the nature of the elastic body, that the stored energy associated with a deformation described by ax ay, az at constant volume (i.e., with axayaz l) must be a function of two quantities (q +q +q ) and (l/a +l/ay+l/ag). The simplest acceptable function of these two quantities can be written... 

Response of a material under static or dynamic load is governed by the stress-strain relationship. A typical stress-strain diagram for concrete is shown in Figure 5.3. As the fibers of a material are deformed, stress in the material is changed in accordance with its stress-strain diagram. In the elastic region, stress increases linearly with increasing strain for most steels. This relation is quantified by the modulus of elasticity of the material. 

Concret does not have well defined elastic and plastic regions due to its brittle nature. A maximum compressive stress value is reached at relatively low strains and is maintained for small deformations until crushing occurs. The stress-strain relationship for concrete is a nonlinear curve. Thus, the elastic modulus varies continuously with strain. The secant modulus at service load is normally used to define a single value for the modulus of elasticity. This procedure is given in most concrete texts. Masonry lias a stress-strain diagram similar to concrete but is typically of lower compressive strength and modulus of elasticity. 

Stress-strain relationships for soil are difficult to model due to their complexity. In normal practice, response of soil consists of analyzing compression and shear stresses produced by the structure, applied as static loads. Change in soil strength with deformation is usually disregarded. Clay soils will exhibit some elastic response and are capable of absorbing blast-energy however, there may be insufficient test data to define this response quantitatively. Soil has a very low tensile capacity thus the stress-strain relationship is radically different in the tension region than in compression. 

Firstly, it helps to provide a cross-check on whether the response of the material is linear or can be treated as such. Sometimes a material is so fragile that it is not possible to apply a low enough strain or stress to obtain a linear response. However, it is also possible to find non-linear responses with a stress/strain relationship that will allow satisfactory application of some of the basic features of linear viscoelasticity. Comparison between the transformed data and the experiment will indicate the validity of the application of linear models. 

In the [ 45]j tensile test (ASTM D 3518,1991) shown in Fig 3.22, a uniaxial tension is applied to a ( 45°) laminate symmetric about the mid-plane to measure the strains in the longitudinal and transverse directions, and Ey. This can be accomplished by instrumenting the specimen with longitudinal and transverse element strain gauges. Therefore, the shear stress-strain relationships can be calculated from the tabulated values of and Ey, corresponding to particular values of longitudinal load, (or stress relations derived from laminated plate theory (Petit, 1969 Rosen, 1972) ... 

A simple bubble machine is devised and successfully applied in characterising lightly crosslinked PE resins for foam expansion. The biaxial stress-strain relationship is deduced from the air injection rate and pressure. The effects of strain rate, temperatnre and crosslinker level on the stress-strain behavionr are investigated. Uniaxial extension experiments are also performed and compared with biaxial extension data. 5 refs. 

The properties of a material must dictate the applications in which it will best perform its intended use. All materials made to date with polymerized sulphur show time-dependent stress-strain behaviour. The reversion to the brittle behaviour of orthorhombic sulphur is inevitable as the sulphur transforms from the metastable polymeric forms to the thermodynamically stable crystalline structure. The time-span involved of at most 15 months (to date) would indicate that no such materials should be used in applications dependent on the strain softening behaviour. Design should not be based on the stress-strain relationships observed at an age of a few days. Since the strength of these materials is maintained, however, uses based on strength as the only mechanical criterion would be reasonable. 

From the viewpoint of the mechanics of continua, the stress-strain relationship of a perfectly elastic material is fully described in terms of the strain energy density function W. In fact, this relationship is expressed as a linear combination erf the partial derivatives of W with respect to the three invariants of deformation tensor, /j, /2, and /3. It is the fundamental task for a phenomenologic study of elastic material to determine W as a function of these three independent variables either from molecular theory or by experiment. The present paper has reviewed approaches to this task from biaxial extension experiment and the related data. The results obtained so far demonstrate that the kinetic theory of polymer network does not describe actual behavior of rubber vulcanizates. In particular, contrary to the kinetic theory, the observed derivative bW/bI2 does not vanish. 

EXAMPLE 4.1 Stress-Strain Relationship for a Concentric-Cylinder Viscometer with Small Gaps. Examine Equation (8) in the limit f -> 1 to show that the relationship reduces to Equation (1) under these conditions. 

Stress-strain relationship from a concentric-cylinder viscometer Capillary viscometers versus concentric-cylinder viscometers Inherent viscosity at low volume fractions Extent of hydration from intrinsic viscosity measurements Empirical determination of the Mark-Houwink coefficients Variation of viscosity with polymer configuration... 

The notion of fluid strains and stresses and how they relate to the velocity field is one of the fundamental underpinnings of the fluid equations of motion—the Navier-Stokes equations. While there is some overlap with solid mechanics, the fact that fluids deform continuously under even the smallest stress also leads to some fundamental differences. Unlike solid mechanics, where strain (displacement per unit length) is a fundamental concept, strain itself makes little practical sense in fluid mechanics. This is because fluids can strain indefinitely under the smallest of stresses—they do not come to a finite-strain equilibrium under the influence of a particular stress. However, there can be an equilibrium relationship between stress and strain rate. Therefore, in fluid mechanics, it is appropriate to use the concept of strain rate rather than strain. It is the relationship between stress and strain rate that serves as the backbone principle in viscous fluid mechanics. 

---