Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Steric interactions, attractive

The surface forces apparatus (SEA) can measure the interaction forces between two surfaces through a liquid [10,11]. The SEA consists of two curved, molecularly smooth mica surfaces made from sheets with a thickness of a few micrometers. These sheets are glued to quartz cylindrical lenses ( 10-mm radius of curvature) and mounted with then-axes perpendicular to each other. The distance is measured by a Fabry-Perot optical technique using multiple beam interference fringes. The distance resolution is 1-2 A and the force sensitivity is about 10 nN. With the SEA many fundamental interactions between surfaces in aqueous solutions and nonaqueous liquids have been identified and quantified. These include the van der Waals and electrostatic double-layer forces, oscillatory forces, repulsive hydration forces, attractive hydrophobic forces, steric interactions involving polymeric systems, and capillary and adhesion forces. Although cleaved mica is the most commonly used substrate material in the SEA, it can also be coated with thin films of materials with different chemical and physical properties [12]. [Pg.246]

In this section, we present a unified picture of the different electronic effects that combine to determine methyl rotor potentials in the S0, Sp and D0 electronic states of different substituted toluenes. Our approach is based on analysis of ab initio wavefunctions using the natural bond orbitals (NBOs)33 of Weinhold and cowork-ers. We will attempt to decompose the methyl torsional potential into two dominant contributions. The first is repulsive steric interactions, which are important only when an ortho substituent is present. The second is attractive donor-acceptor interactions between CH bond pairs and empty antibonding orbitals vicinal to the CH bonds. In the NBO basis, these attractive interactions dominate the barrier in ethane (1025 cm-1) and in 2-methylpropene (1010 cm-1) see Figure 3. By analogy, donor-acceptor attractions are important in toluenes whenever there is a substantial difference in bond order between the two ring CC bonds adjacent to the C-CH3 bond. Viewed the other way around, we can use the measured methyl rotor potential as a sensitive probe of local ring geometry. [Pg.176]

Influence of Addition of Electrolyte and Increase of Temperature Addition of electrolyte or increase of temperature at a given electrolyte concentration to a sterically stabilized dispersion may result in its flocculation at a critical concentration or temperature, which in many cases coincides with the theta point for the stabilizing chain. At the theta point the mixing term in the steric interaction is zero and any yield value measured should correspond to the residual van der Waals attraction. The energy arising from van der Waals attraction may be calculated from the following approximate relationship,... [Pg.421]

The observed tendencies for the Bu3Al <— ER 3 adducts clearly reflect the influence of repulsive steric interactions between the large t-Bu and z-Pr substituents which become less important with increasing atomic radius of the central pentele. Such interactions overcompensate attractive dipolar... [Pg.238]

Fig. 15 Predicted cooperative effects on activation energies (in kcal/mol) at the B3LYP/ 6-31G level for model enediynes ( push and pull denote through-space repulsive (steric) and attractive (H-bonding) interactions of ort/zo-substituents with in-plane 71-orbitals of an adjacent acetylene moeity). Fig. 15 Predicted cooperative effects on activation energies (in kcal/mol) at the B3LYP/ 6-31G level for model enediynes ( push and pull denote through-space repulsive (steric) and attractive (H-bonding) interactions of ort/zo-substituents with in-plane 71-orbitals of an adjacent acetylene moeity).
Obviously, steric interactions disfavor the boat relative to the chair form. Nonetheless, systems can be designed where the bow to bow nonbonded attraction may become dominant. It is interesting to discuss in detail one example in order to illustrate our approach. [Pg.111]

These results point to a significant effect of the configuration of the diol moiety on the intracomplex forces involved in the isomeric [C/j-M/j/j], [C/j-M/js], and [C/j-Mss] adducts. The OH- - -O hydrogen bonding in these complexes is responsible for the bathochromic shifts observed in the corresponding spectra. " Different spectral shifts for diastereomeric complexes are often due to the superimposing effects of attractive dispersive (polarization) and repulsive (steric) interactions. ... [Pg.188]

When a CSP is applied, the separation mechanism is based on the differences in the interaction between the chiral selector in the stationary phase and the enantiomers of the solute. Depending on the nature of the selector and the type of the solute, the stereoselective interaction can be based on interactions of one or more different types such as inclusion complexation, Tr-jr-interaction, dipole stacking, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interaction, hydrophobic interaction, and steric interaction [35]. In order to obtain chiral discrimination between the enantiomers, a three-point interaction is required between at least one of the enantiomers and the CSP [36]. The interactions can be of attractive as well as repulsive nature (e.g., steric and electrostatic interactions). [Pg.509]

Comparatively, the walls of a reaction cavity of an inclusion complex are less rigid but more variegated than those of a zeolite. Depending upon the constituent molecules of the host lattice, the guest molecules may experience an environment which is tolerant or intolerant of the motions that lead from an initial ketone conformation to its Norrish II photoproducts and which either can direct those motions via selective attractive (NB, hydrogen bonding) and/or repulsive (steric) interactions. The specificity of the reaction cavity is dependent upon the structure of the host molecule, the mode of guest inclusion, and the mode of crystallization of the host. [Pg.195]

One may distinguish positive and negative recognition, depending on whether the discrimination between different substrates by a given receptor is dominated by attractive or repulsive (steric) interactions, respectively. [Pg.13]


See other pages where Steric interactions, attractive is mentioned: [Pg.376]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.2556]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.382]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.106 , Pg.107 ]




SEARCH



Interaction attraction

Interactions attractive

Steric interaction

Sterical interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info