Three-point interaction

Fig. 22. Principle of chiral receptor—substrate recognition (a) formation of diastereomeric inclusion complexes (b) three-point interaction model.

The first four facets are rotationally equivalent to each other as are the final four. The two sets are related by reflectional symmetry to each other. When a chiral adsorbate, for example, S-lysine, is used, the reflectional symmetry is no longer valid and only rotationally equivalent facets should be formed. This was demonstrated elegantly by Zhao with STM [53], The driving force for facet formation is proposed to be a three-point interaction involving the carboxylate group, the a-amino group, and the amino-terminated side chain. The simultaneous optimization of adsorbate-adsorbate and adsorbate-substrate interactions determines the stereochemistry of the facet. 

This LSR-CSA technique (discussed in detail in ref. 76) has also been appUed to a series of sulfoxides. Nitroarylsulfoxides are also capable of a strong three-point interaction with fluoroalcohols 1, an ability that is responsible for a considerable difference in stability between the solvates. Mixtures of Id and 2,4-dinitrophenyl methyl sulfoxide are red, and the intensity of this color is inversely proportional to temperature, consistent with formation of tt-tt complexes. Crystallization of the racemic sulfoxide from carbon tetrachloride solutions of (/ )- d leaves mother liquor enriched in the (i )-sulfoxide enantiomer, that predicted by the usual solvation model (41), to form the more stable solvate. With this compound it is also apparent that the (/ , iS )-solvate may differ considerably from the predicted conformation, by population of 42. This additional interaction. 

When a CSP is applied, the separation mechanism is based on the differences in the interaction between the chiral selector in the stationary phase and the enantiomers of the solute. Depending on the nature of the selector and the type of the solute, the stereoselective interaction can be based on interactions of one or more different types such as inclusion complexation, Tr-jr-interaction, dipole stacking, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interaction, hydrophobic interaction, and steric interaction [35]. In order to obtain chiral discrimination between the enantiomers, a three-point interaction is required between at least one of the enantiomers and the CSP [36]. The interactions can be of attractive as well as repulsive nature (e.g., steric and electrostatic interactions). 

Optical isomerism is the result of a dissymmetry in molecular suhstitution. The basic aspects of optical isomerism are discussed in various textbooks of organic chemistry. Optical isomers (enantiomers) may have different physiological activities from each other provided that their interaction with a receptor or some other effector structure involves the asymmetric carbon atom of the enantiomeric molecule and that the three different substituents on this carbon atom interact with the receptor. The Easson-Stedman hypothesis assumes that a three-point interaction ensures stereospecificity, since only one of the enantiomers will fit the other one is capable of a two-point attachment only, as shown in figure 1.13 for the reaction with a hypothetical planar receptor. However, it is reasonable to assume that receptor stereospecificity can also undergo a change when the receptor conformation is altered by a receptor-drug interaction. 

The sulfoxide molecules are accommodated in the void between the layers via three-point interaction hydrogen bonding between NH3+ and the sulfinyl group, the tilted T -shaped interaction between two phenyl groups [14], and the CH/it... 

Figure 2.20 Proposed three-point interaction model between Pirkle-type chiral stationary phase and the best orientations of 3-aminobenzo[n]pyrene for maximum interaction. (Adapted from Ref. Ill with permission.)...

Mobile phases are usually binary or ternary mixtures of solvents. Selectivity is affected mostly by mobile phase composition rather than strength, and peak shape and retention are both influenced by the addition of organic modifiers.101 Some compounds naturally have 77-donor or 77-acceptor groups and can be resolved directly. In many cases, however, introduction of 77-donating groups by derivatization steps is necessary. Figure 2.20 shows the proposed three-point interaction of 3-aminobenzo[a]pyrene, a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), with a Pirkle-type stationary phase.111 Two possible interactions are illustrated, showing the best orientations for maximum interaction. 

Figure 22-21. Three-point interaction of the most stable complex between 2,2,2-trifluoro-l-(9-anthryl)ethanol stationary phase and DNB derivative. (Reprinted from reference 94, with permission.)...

V. A. Davankov,The nature of chiral recognition Is it a three-point interaction ... 

Within the solute/CSP complex, chiral recognition is based on the "three-point interaction" model proposed by Dalgliesh (12). According to this mechanism, three interactions occur between the solute and chiral selec-... 

Pirkle or brush type bonded phases Helical chiral polymers (polysaccharides) Cyclodextrins and crown ethers Immobilised enzymes Amino acid metal complexes Three-point interaction Attractive hydrophobic bonding Host guest interaction within chiral cavity Chiral affinity Diastereomeric complexation... 

Since enantiomers have identical physical and chemical properties, their separation requires a mechanism that recognizes the difference in their shape. A suitable mechanism for chromatography is provided by the formation of reversible transient diastereomer association complexes with a suitable chiral selector. To achieve a useful separation the association complexes must differ in stability resulting from a sterically controlled preference for the fit of one enantiomer over the other with the chiral selector. In addition, the kinetic properties of the formation/dissociation of the complex must be fast on the chromatographic time scale to minimize band broadening and achieve useful resolution. Enantioselectivity based on the formation of transient diastereomer complexes is commonly rationalized assuming a three-point interaction model [1-4,17,18]. Accordingly, enantioselectivity requires a minimum of three simultaneous interactions between the chiral selector and at least one of the enantiomers, where at least one of these interactions is stereochemically dependent. The points of interactions... 

---