Steam Reformers Heat Loss

When combustion air preheat is used, the air preheat unit may replace the boiler feed water coil. Flue gas exits this unit at about 300 degrees F. This provides a typical heat loss of 3% of the overall reformer efficiency. Steam is also made in a process steam generator which extracts heat from the reformer outlet process gas. The heat recovery unit and process steam generator normally have a common steam drum. 

The subsequent steam reforming section is operated at very high temperatures 850-900 °C. The SMR catalysts themselves are already active below 400 °C, but high temperatures are necessary to drive the strongly endothermic reaction forward [8]. In industry, nickel catalysts are used in high-alloy reaction tubes, which are heated by external burners. This design is expensive and leads to heat losses, although much of the heat is recuperated. Noble metal catalysts such as sup-... 

Equation 9-4 and related heats of reaction can be manipulated to show that the maximum efficiency is a state point function, regardless of path (steam reforming, partial oxidation, or autothermal reforming), and is achieved at the thermoneutral point. In practice, x is set slightly higher than the thermoneutral point so that additional heat is generated to offset heat losses from the reformer. Table 9-1 presents efficiencies at the thermoneutral point for various hydrocarbon fuels. 

One last point to be noted pertains to a comparison between the steam-reforming reaction (Case 4) and the methanol cracking reaction (Case 5). From the exergy ratio calculations, the reforming reaction appears to be superior in its ability to produce lower quality fuel. However, the overall efficiency calculations show a lower value for Case 4 than that for Case 5. The main reason for this reversal is due to the fact that nearly 25% of the recuperated energy for Case 4 is in the form of the heat of evaporation of H 0 and is not recovered from the exhaust gases. The result 1s an increase in the stack losses. 

In case of a pressure loss accident, the maximum escape rate of the primary coolant is restricted by flow restrictors. A depressurization will take at least two minutes so that destructive dynamic forces in the primary system can be excluded. All heat exchanging components incl. steam reformer are designed to keep their pressure, if there is a pressure loss in the primary system [10]. 

If hydrogen production processes are compared, the interdependence of efficiency, capital investment and value of the byproduct has to be taken into account. From the reaction equations, it can be derived that an essential part of the hydrogen is gained from water, e.g., 50 % in the case of steam reforming of natural gas plus CO conversion. On the other hand, all carbon in the raw materials is finally converted to CO2 and released into the atmosphere the least unfavorable process is steam reforming with a CO2 to H2 ratio of 0.25, the worst in coal gasification with a respective ratio of 1. The use of heavier raw materials is connected with a loss of efficiency since a larger mass of C-carriers and water need to be heated up to reaction temperatures [51]. 

An energy efficiency rating of 76% had already been achieved in the production of hydrogen with the first 40 Nm /h-class membrane reformer system the second system was designed to improve on this. For this purpose, the 40 NmVh-class membrane reformer was operated at a higher methane conversion rate and reduced natural gas input, steam-to-carbon ratio, auxiliary power consumption and heat losses. These improvements were expected to increase the efficiency up to 80% on the system design basis. 

Methanol is an attractive fuel for low-power applications, because the reaction temperature required for steam reforming is limited to values below 300—400 °C, which in turn minimizes heat losses from a small-scale system. Hence numerous research groups working on microchannel steam reforming are focusing on methanol as fuel. The carbon monoxide content present in reformate produced by methanol steam reforming is the lowest of all fuels compared at the same molar steam-to-carbon (S/C) ratio. Assuming an S/C ratio of >2 and a reaction temperature of 300 °C, not more than 1.2% of CO will be present in the feed [13]. This is related to the water gas shift (WGS) equilibrium and reduces the workload of the subsequent gas-purification steps. 

The advantage of converting the hydrocarbons in the fuel cell rather than converting the fuel to hydrogen first is evident. If steam reforming of natural gas takes place in an externally fired reformer, there is a loss in efficiency because of the high temperature created in the flame, which is not utilised fully for work because the waste heat ean only be recovered via the Carnot cycle as shown in Example 2.3. 

A proper optimisation of a steam reformer must always be based on a furnace model, since the delivered heat flux profile is bounded by the furnace configuration and the flexibility of the burners. Seen from an exeigy point of view outer tube-wall temperature and heat flux profiles may decrease the exergy losses [335], but it should be checked if they can be provided by a furnace. 

This indicated that total oxidation was predominant at the reactor inlet but then steam reforming consumed the water that had been produced. Heat losses of about 1.14kW were calculated for the reactor, which underlined the need for sufficient insulation, especially at temperatures exceeding 600 ° C. When the feed was switched from sulfur-free jet fuel to jet fuel containing 300 ppm sulfur, conversion dropped quickly and then deteriorated slowly with the time on stream. 

---