Statistics frequency distributions

Table 4.30. Statistical frequency distributions of electron countsa, common formulasa, and localized bonding descriptions (in terms of number of metal-centered lone pairs, 2c/2e bonds, tu bonds, and average sd hybridization) for organometallic complexes of groups 3-10...

Figs. 2 and 3 show two theoretical blending bed reclaiming models. The material slices and the statistical frequency distributions of the input and output variations... 

In reference to the tensile-strength table, consider the summary statistics X and. s by days. For each day, the t statistic could be computed. If this were repeated over an extensive simulation and the resultant t quantities plotted in a frequency distribution, they would match the corresponding distribution oft values summarized in Table 3-5. 

The use of various statistical techniques has been discussed (46) for two situations. For standard air quality networks with an extensive period of record, analysis of residuals, visual inspection of scatter diagrams, and comparison of cumulative frequency distributions are quite useful techniques for assessing model performance. For tracer studies the spatial coverage is better, so that identification of meiximum measured concentrations during each test is more feasible. However, temporal coverage is more limited with a specific number of tests not continuous in time. 

A brief digression. In the language of statistics, the results for each of the stepped distributions in Figure 10-1 constitute a sample1 of the population that is distributed according to the continuous curve for the universe. A sample thus contains a limited number of x s taken from the universe that contains all possible z s. All simple frequency distributions are characterized by a mean and a variance. (The square root of the variance is the standard deviation.) For the population, the mean is u and the variance is a2. For any sample, the mean is x and the (estimate of) variance is s2. Now, x and s2 for any sample can never be as reliable as p and a2 because no sample can contain the entire population ir and s2 are therefore only the experimental estimates of g and cr2. In all that follows, we shall be concerned only with these estimates for simplicity s sake, we shall call s2 the variance. We have already met s—for example, at the foot of Table 7-4. 

It would be of obvious interest to have a theoretically underpinned function that describes the observed frequency distribution shown in Fig. 1.9. A number of such distributions (symmetrical or skewed) are described in the statistical literature in full mathematical detail apart from the normal- and the f-distributions, none is used in analytical chemistry except under very special circumstances, e.g. the Poisson and the binomial distributions. Instrumental methods of analysis that have Powjon-distributed noise are optical and mass spectroscopy, for instance. For an introduction to parameter estimation under conditions of linked mean and variance, see Ref. 41. 

If possible, the intake should be expressed both as a statistical mean or median and maximum (e.g., 95th percentile). Ideally, a frequency distribution of exposure for the study area population is the goal. Inmost cases, however, the variability in exposure medium intake rates and pollutant concentrations are unknown and average/maximum values must suffice. 

However, since the data used in this study are subject to the limitations and uncertainties cited above, the results of this analysis represent only a very rough approximation of the national frequency distribution of indoor radon levels. EPA s national survey will seek to more accurately characterize this distribution through use of a larger sample size, a statistically based survey design, and consistent, quality assured sample collection and measurement procedures. 

Thus, when a property of the sample (which exists as a large volume of material) is to be measured, there usually will be differences between the analytical data derived from application of the test methods to a gross lot or gross consignment and the data from the sample lot. This difference (the sampling error) has a frequency distribution with a mean value and a variance. Variance is a statistical term defined as the mean square of errors the square root of the variance is more generally known as the standard deviation or the standard error of sampling. 

Another aspect of matching output to user needs involves presentation of results in a statistical framework—namely, as frequency distributions of concentrations. The output of deterministic models is not directly suited to this task, because it provides a single sample point for each run. Analytic linkages can be made between observed frequency distributions and computed model results. The model output for a particular set of meteorologic conditions can be on the frequency distribution of each station for which observations are available in sufficient sample size. If the model is validated for several different points on the frequency distribution based on today s estimated emission, it can be used to fit a distribution for cases of forecast emission. The fit can be made by relating characteristics of the distribution with a specific set of model predictions. For example, the distribution could be assumed to be log-normal, with a mean and standard deviation each determined by its own function of output concentrations computed for a standardized set of meteorologic conditions. This, in turn, can be linked to some effect on people or property that is defined in terms of the predicted concentration statistics. The diagram below illustrates this process ... 

A statistical term referring to a monoparametric distribution used to obtain confidence intervals for the variance of a normally distributed random variable. The so-called chi-square (x ) test is a protocol for comparing the goodness of fit of observed and theoretical frequency distributions. 

If the assessment endpoint is a distribution, or a statistic from a distribution (e.g., 95th percentile), it is essential to be clear how the distribution is interpreted (Suter 1998, p 129). If it is a frequency distribution, to what statistical population does the distribution refer For example, does the distribution represent a population of individuals, an assemblage of species, a number of locations treated with pesticides, or a series of time periods The answer to this question has substantial implications for the structure of the assessment model and the types of data required. 

Fig. 4.—Frequency of Occurrence of Homopolymeric Sequences of D-Mannosyluronic Residues in Alginate from Ascophyllum nodosum. [Key 9, predicted values, based on a statistically random distribution of glycosyluronic residues and O, values determined experimentally.]...

With a comparative evaluation the measured value obtained by a measurement is compared with information already collected. In the most favorable case, current frequency distributions as well as characteristic parameters (reference values) derived statistically in accordance with specific standards will be available which describe the normal occurrence of a substance in an environmental medium. Since it is defined exclusively statistically, a reference value is not linked with any health-related evaluation. If, for example, the concentration lies below the reference value, this does not imply any health-related evaluation but rather only that the vast majority of the population is exposed to a comparable order of magnitude. 

A third and often neglected reason for the need for care fill application of chemometric methods is the problem of the type of distribution of environmental data. Most basic and advanced statistical methods are based on the assumption of normally distributed data. But in the case of environmental data, this assumption is often not valid. Figs. 1-7 and 1-8 demonstrate two different types of experimentally found empirical data distribution. Particularly for trace amounts in the environment, a log-normal distribution, as demonstrated for the frequency distribution of N02 in ambient air (Fig. 1-7), is typical. 

In the terminology of statistics analytically measured quantities (properties, features, variables) are random variables x. Such a variable may, e.g., be density, absorbance, concentration, or toxicity. Hence, repeated measurements (observations) using the same sample, or measurements of comparable samples, do not result in identical values, x but are single realizations of the random variable x. Using the frequency distributions... 

More often in practical measurements x and its distribution function are continuous variables and therefore F(x) may be differentiated to give a (probability) density function f(x) the shape of which resembles the frequency distribution. Further details are not of interest here, but we should know that we utilize such density functions via well-known statistical tables. 

However, we can take our analysis of the student s response to the drug one step further and attempt to quantify where individuals are within the group s distribution. The statistical expression standard deviation is a measure of how wide the frequency distribution is for a given group. For example, if someone says, My cat is a lot bigger than average, what does this mean The standard deviation is a way of saying precisely what a lot means. 

Probability distribution models can be used to represent frequency distributions of variability or uncertainty distributions. When the data set represents variability for a model parameter, there can be uncertainty in any non-parametric statistic associated with the empirical data. For situations in which the data are a random, representative sample from an unbiased measurement or estimation technique, the uncertainty in a statistic could arise because of random sampling error (and thus be dependent on factors such as the sample size and range of variability within the data) and random measurement or estimation errors. The observed data can be corrected to remove the effect of known random measurement error to produce an error-free data set (Zheng Frey, 2005). 

It is emphasized that by means of the statistical frequency analysis it is possible to separate dataset in populations, even if can be difficult to select one or two general threshold to utilize as reference to identify background values. In addition, the value distributions are not sufficient to divide the dataset into different populations, because they show an overlap, and give no idea of the spatial distribution and geometry of the geochemical anomalies. This is true both at local and regional scale. 

---