Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solvent sensitizer combination

The ratio of epoxide to dioxetane increased 28-fold on going from methylene chloride to benzene with tetraphenylporphin as sensitizer, such solvents as pinacolone, dioxan, and acetone occupying intermediate positions. Systematic investigation showed that epoxide more often than not accompanies the dioxetane from sensitized oxygenation of norbornene (22) and of biadamantylidene (H. J. Shapiro, quoted in (23) (26)). For each solvent-sensitizer combination, the ratio of epoxide to dioxetane increased in the order biadamantylidene < norbornene binor-bornylidene. This is also the decreasing order of reactivity of these olefins toward singlet oxygen. [Pg.22]

Pure dry alkali DNM salts are stable at ambient temperature, are heat and shock sensitive, and decompose slowly in polar solvents releasing N2O gas. Small amounts of impurities (e.g. KNO3) considerably decrease the shock and heat sensitivity. Combined IR and MS... [Pg.668]

The ability of the maleimide unit to switch off emission is also exemplified by 86, due to Verhoeven s coworkers [161] at the University of Amsterdam and Akzo Nobel in The Netherlands. Again the Michael reaction of the maleimide with thiols produces nicely emissive material. Solvent-sensitive emission, characteristic of these donor-acceptor systems with strongly coupling bridges, is a special feature of 86 after thiolation. An added interest of 86 stems from the occurrence of PET to the maleimide unit from the through-bond charge-transfer excited state [162], an unusual combination of photophenomena. [Pg.132]

The most popular GPC detector is the differential refractometer. It is a concentration-sensitive detector that measures the difference in refractive index (ARI) between the eluent (the flowing solvent) and the sample solution. It is a universal detector that will respond to any polymer with a significant refractive index difference from the solvent. So another consideration when selecting a solvent, besides being a good solvent for the polymer, must be a refractive index that will provide a significant ART The solvent/polymer combinations listed in the Appendix fulfill this criterion. [Pg.572]

Most contact adhesives contain a solvent and have a formulation tiiat combines a base of synthetic rubber such as polychloroprene or polystyrene-butadiene with reactive phenolic resins and metal oxides. In addition, there are also transparent types based on polyurethane which provide excellent bonding results for soft plastics such as plasticized PVC (used in many household articles). Recently, a solvent-fi-ee generation of contact adhesives, e.g, based on acrylate, has entered the market. This type can be used to bond solvent-sensitive materials such as polystyrene foam. [Pg.92]

Hence, the sensitivity requirements for the determination of A -THC are indicated in Fig. 4. Plasma levels will obviously be modified by the amount of THC absorbed and by the rate of absorption but if levels are to be measured later than 4 hours after administration a sensitivity of 1 ng/ml is required. Such as sensitivity combined with specificity is perhaps limited to the mass fragmentographic techniques. We have so far encountered little interference in the mass fragmento graphic determination of A -THC provided redistilled solvents, particularly ethanol, and all silanized glassware are used. If interference does occur the silylation technique provides an alternative. [Pg.439]

The LODs obtained by using off-line SPE without solvent evaporation combined with conventional LC-FLD are comparable to those obtained by the CS-capillary LC-DAD method (see Table 4). In other words, although less sensitive detection is used the coupling of analyte enriehment by CS and capillary LC enables the detection of PAHs with sensitivity eomparable to that obtained by the conventional method. The main advantage of the CS-eapillary LC-DAD approach is that off-line preconcentration operations are not required. Aeeording to the literature both approaches can be considered adequate for the analysis of PAHs in waste water and polluted waters [4, 5, 16, 17]. [Pg.573]

The nebulization concept has been known for many years and is commonly used in hair and paint spays and similar devices. Greater control is needed to introduce a sample to an ICP instrument. For example, if the highest sensitivities of detection are to be maintained, most of the sample solution should enter the flame and not be lost beforehand. The range of droplet sizes should be as small as possible, preferably on the order of a few micrometers in diameter. Large droplets contain a lot of solvent that, if evaporated inside the plasma itself, leads to instability in the flame, with concomitant variations in instrument sensitivity. Sometimes the flame can even be snuffed out by the amount of solvent present because of interference with the basic mechanism of flame propagation. For these reasons, nebulizers for use in ICP mass spectrometry usually combine a means of desolvating the initial spray of droplets so that they shrink to a smaller, more uniform size or sometimes even into small particles of solid matter (particulates). [Pg.106]

Another aspect of cost reduction would be solvent economy. The need to preferentially select inexpensive solvents and employ the minimum amount of solvent per analysis would be the third performance criteria. Finally, to conserve sample and to have the capability of determining trace contaminants, the fourth criterion would be that the combination of column and detector should provide the maximum possible mass sensitivity and, thus, the minimum amount of sample. The performance criteria are summarized in Table 1. Certain operating limits are inherent in any analytical instrument and these limits will vary with the purpose for which the instrument was designed. For example, the preparative chromatograph will have very different operating characteristics from those of the analytical chromatograph. [Pg.362]

Traditionally, LC and GC are used as separate steps in the sample analysis sequence, with collection in between, and then followed by transfer. A major limitation of off-line LC-GC is that only a small aliquot of the LC fraction is injected into the GC p. (e.g. 1 - 2 p.1 from 1 ml). Therefore, increasing attention is now given to the on-line combination of LC and GC. This involves the transfer of large volumes of eluent into capillary GC. In order to achieve this, the so-called on-column interface (retention gap) or a programmed temperature vaporizor (PTV) in front of the GC column are used. Nearly all on-line LC-GC applications involve normal-phase (NP) LC, because the introduction of relatively large volumes of apolar, relatively volatile mobile phases into the GC unit is easier than for aqueous solvents. On-line LC-GC does not only increase the sensitivity but also saves time and improves precision. [Pg.273]

A sensitive determination of alkanesulfonates combines RP-HPLC with an on-line derivatization procedure using fluorescent ion pairs followed by an online sandwich-type phase separation with chloroform as the solvent. The ion pairs are detected by fluorescence. With l-cyano-[2-(2-trimethylammonio)-ethyl]benz(/)isoindole as a fluorescent cationic dye a quantification limit for anionic surfactants including alkanesulfonates of less than 1 pg/L per compound for a 2.5-L water sample is established [30,31]. [Pg.168]


See other pages where Solvent sensitizer combination is mentioned: [Pg.437]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.890]    [Pg.672]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.672]    [Pg.672]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.232]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.22 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info